Marina Terragni: "There is a desire to erase women, their bodies, their difference".

An interview with writer Marina Terragni: Zan bill, the language of inclusion, feminism and transphobia. "I am not a gender, I am a woman".
Condividi questo articolo

Original article here

Marina Terragni corrects me straight away: 'I am not a historic feminist, I am simply a feminist'. For some time, before the DDL Zan (a bill presented by Italian deputy Alessandro Zan) matter became current in Italy, Terragni - writer and philosophy lecturer on contract - has been dealing with one of the most controversial issues in the western feminist world, gender identity: a concept that has divided feminists in two, those who believe that the category of woman should be rethought and extended to include people who are not born biologically female (such as trans women) and those, instead, who think that one cannot be a woman regardless of their bodies so one cannot simply deny biological reality.

"Even in Spain,' says Terragni, 'a bill is being discussed whereby anyone can self-declare their gender identity, i.e. say they are male or female, regardless of their birth sex. In Italy, there is not even a real discussion on the issue. The subject has been surreptitiously introduced into a bill, that of Mr Zan, which aims to combat violence against homosexuals and transsexuals, about which nobody has any objections, of course; while there is much to object and to be said about gender identity, not least that I am not a gender, but I am a woman. Why can't we talk about this freely in Italy?".

The concept of gender identity was coined in the 1990s by the American philosopher Judith Butler in her essay Gender Troubles, in which she argued not only that gender is constructed by the social norm, but that there is no biological sex pre-existing to gender, i.e. that even sex (male, female) is a social construction. The dispute might seem academic were it not for the fact that, especially in America, support for these theories is at the root of a cultural war that has resulted in slander, dismissal and marginalisation. "The news", says Terragni, "is that intolerance is also taking root in Italy".

Three weeks ago, the American writer Rebecca Solnit refused to be interviewed by Marina Terragni at the Mantua Literature Festival: "She demanded to read the questions I wanted to ask her beforehand and, considering them transphobic, she vetoed me".

Were they provocative questions? 

They were good questions, and almost all about America today.

I think this is the first time something like this has happened in Italy.

No, you are wrong.

Had it happened before?

It happened that, because of some of the ideas I have, people wanted to ban me from University. Now I can finally say it.

Are you kidding? When did it happen? Where did it happen?

During this academic year I was scheduled to teach a course in Philosophy and Ethics of Communication in a master's programme at the IUAV University of Venice, a completely different subject from feminist issues. Yet, a fortnight before I was due to start teaching, Maria Luisa Frisa, who runs the degree course, called me to ask me to resign from the post because, she said, 'Certain ideas of yours are unwelcome to me and to the students'.

What about her?

I told her that she could forget it, and that if she wanted to kick me out of the university she would have to assume her responsibility for it by rescinding the contract unilaterally with a letter explaining exactly which one of my ideas were incompatible with teaching and why.

She didn't do that, I imagine.

No, but, on the other hand, now that my course is over, I have written a letter to the Rector of the University in which I recount the events that took place. We'll see what happens next. In the meanwhile, for the first time, I'm talking about it.

But in America you lose your job because of these things: you're not asked to leave.

Can you realise the pressure you're under? I don't live off the university job, I have other sources of income. Yet, how can you withstand the pressure if you only have that? It's obvious: to protect yourself, you will adapt to the ideas that are deemed socially acceptable. Do you realise that this is a path leading to conformism? I assure you that, even in Italy, there are professors who do not say what they really think for fear of being targeted. This was not a problem of mine: it's a problem of freedom of teaching and thinking.

I think that if they had taken you out, they would not have got away with it.

Well of course: I would have put it in the newspapers.

And I also think that the newspapers would have defended you.

And it is a good thing that, in Italy and in Europe, we are still scandalised by gags. I think that this is the point: in response to the menace coming from the other side of the West, Europe must become the continent of free thought, the home of free speech, I consider this its historic task.

Why, in your opinion, have you been accused of transphobia?

Because it is a trick that works well in disqualifying criticism. You say transphobic and suddenly an argument becomes the result of irrational and uncontainable fear.

Isn't it?

Me, transphobic? What do they know? In the 1980s, when the only ones who cared about trans people were those few militant radicals, I fought, along with Pina Bonanno, to force the Italian state to accept the change of sex. This is how in 1982 the law "Legge 14 Aprile 1982, n. 164." came about, which allowed Pina to be called Pina instead of Giuseppe, the name she had at birth.

What has changed today?

That people now claim the unilateral right to proclaim themselves a woman or a man, beyond any surgical, pharmacological or even administrative process. I self-declare and self-identify in my sexual identity and I demand that the community recognise it, without a peep.

And what is the problem?

The problem is that this undermines the symbolic dimension of the human being. The masculine and the feminine concern the whole of human civilisation, not just the individual. For this reason, self-certification is not enough, but instead, we need a process that takes into account the rights of the individual and those of the community.

But why can't the human symbolic also be discussed?

Because the masculine and feminine are rooted in bodies. This is not a matter of fantasy. The sexual binary - male, female - is an incontrovertible fact. No theory can subvert this fact.

Are you saying that biology matters more than culture?

I am saying that every time the reality of the body has been denied in history, women have paid dearly for it. Carla Lonzi wrote, "Let's Spit on Hegel" (1970), to challenge the idealism with which patriarchy has subjugated women. Now here we go again: in a new and different way. To proclaim oneself a woman is claimed to be enough to be one. Can you see what is happening? There is a strong desire to erase women, their bodies and their difference.

What's the point of that?

Sigmund Freud spent his whole life trying to solve the female enigma and imagined that women felt envy for men's bodies, so-called penis envy, a feeling that no woman I have ever met has ever felt in her life.

But what about it?

And instead, if there is envy, it is the envy that men feel for the reproductive power of women.

Does woman equal mother?

I didn't say that.

Then what do you mean?

I will tell you with a definition by Luisa Muraro.

Go ahead.

A woman is a human being who can be a mother. I underline can, not must. This is the power that men envy women: the power to generate, a power that no technique, however miraculous, has yet succeeded in giving to a man.

You know very well that there are those who would dispute this view.

Of course, there have been women who have transitioned into men and then given birth, but it is not the man who has given birth, it is their female body, their sex that has remained intact despite the change. It seems difficult to deny this.

Who wants to deny women, in your opinion?

The new language of inclusion, for example. The Lancet, one of the most prestigious scientific journals in the world, instead of 'women' it wrote 'bodies with vaginas'. In other words, it has wiped out more than half the world's population in order not to discriminate against a small minority of people.

Are you also against political correctness?

Forget about political correctness: have you ever read 'bodies with prostates'?

No, not yet.

That explains what the erasure of women is.

Judith Butler, on the other hand, says let's extend the category of women to include trans women.

Shall we talk about facts?

Let's talk about facts.

For all my time as a militant in Italian feminism - and I am talking about a few decades now - I will have seen only one trans woman who asked to attend our meetings. Naturally, she was accepted. So I gather that the others are not very interested in feminism.

What does feminism mean to you?

It is a fight against all stereotypes: starting with those narratives according to which the female has to play with dolls and the male with football. Today, however, I observe a worrisome trend in the opposite direction: the surgical adaptation to the stereotype. You are male and you like dolls? Around you someone will wonder if you were not born in the wrong body. Not least because, in some cases (it has to be said too), it is easier to accept the supposed natural 'mistake' than homosexuality.

Aren't you making it too easy?

Do you know how many mothers call me in tears because they don't know what to do with their sons, or rather daughters? Eight out of ten transitions today are of girls.

How do you explain this?

By the fact that the world has changed a lot, but being a woman continues to be very difficult.

It seems to me that there is a subtext in your speech.

What is it?

That males are afraid of women.

That's true.

In your opinion, what do they fear precisely?

I once did a little survey of my male friends. I asked them, "What does manhood mean to you?" The answer I found to be the most accurate was: "Control".

Why accurate?

Because men are terrified of female freedom. They experience it as a threat to your existence. In the Islamic world, for example, they evoke a catastrophic pre-Mohammedan era in which women had no restraints, walked around naked in the streets, had sex freely: it's representative of what can happen if you don't keep women in control: the destruction of civilisation.

Us men, however, are not all Taliban.

But even in the fantasies of you western males, there is the nightmare of the sexually voracious, uncontainable, uncontrollable woman, a nightmare rooted also in the fact that the woman can repeat the sexual act several times, while the man cannot.

Does this bring us closer to the Taliban?

The root of control anxiety is the same, for a Taliban and for a Western male. What changes is the gradation of this anxiety: violent for a Taliban, supervised for a European male like you.

Ah well, that relieves me.

Or, at least, I hope so.


Nicola Mirenzi
03/10/2021 11:37

Translated by Angela Tacchini

Buona parte delle notizie pubblicate da Feminist Post non le leggerai altrove. Per questo è importante sostenerci, anche con un piccolo contributo: Feminist Post è prodotto unicamente grazie a lavoro volontario di molte e non gode di alcun finanziamento.
Se pensi che il nostro lavoro possa essere utile per la tua vita, saremo grate anche del più piccolo contributo.

Puoi darci il tuo contributo cliccando qui: Patreon - Feminist Post
Potrebbe interessarti anche
22 Aprile 2024
Lettera a Rishi Sunak: serve un'inchiesta pubblica sull'influenza dell'ideologia transgender
Centotrenta parlamentari, medici, psichiatri, accademici e detransitioner britannici -tra loro anche JK Rowling- hanno scritto una lettera al primo ministro per invitarlo ad esaminare “l’influenza pervasiva” dell’ideologia transgender nelle scuole e nel servizio sanitario nazionale e ad accertare le responsabilità del danno prodotto a migliaia di bambine e bambini
"Rishi, se leggi questa petizione per favore, fai la cosa giusta e avvia con urgenza un’inchiesta pubblica. Il benessere dei nostri figli dipende da questo”. A scrivere è lo psicoterapeuta James Esses, coordinatore della dichiarazione per la realtà biologica e uno dei firmatari di un appello rivolto al primo ministro britannico dopo il grande scandalo del trattamento dei bambini “confusi e vulnerabili” da parte di professionisti medici, reso evidente del rapporto di Hilary Cass. Tra i primi firmatari anche JK […]
Leggi ora
14 Aprile 2024
Bambine-i imbottiti di ormoni: una sperimentazione in vivo. Chi pagherà per questo?
Hilary Cass, la pediatra inglese che ha prodotto un monumentale rapporto sulla “terapia affermativa” per i minori non usa mezzi termini: quei bambini “sono stati usati come palloni da football”. Non ci sono mai state prove che i puberty blocker funzionino, che riducano il rischio suicidio, che aumentino il benessere dei pazienti: tutt’altro. Chi in mancanza di certezze scientifiche ha comminato questi trattamenti, chi ha addirittura perseguitato tanta gente di buona volontà determinata a denunciare lo scandalo in nome della verità resterà comunque impunito? Keira Bell, la più nota delle detransitioner, auspica conseguenze penali
L’inglese Keira Bell, ex-paziente della Tavistock Clinic di Londra, è sicuramente la più celebre tra le destransitioner. Dopo la pubblicazione della Cass Review dice a The Times che vorrebbe veder partire procedimenti penali perché le bambine-i trattati dalla clinica con puberty blocker e ormoni possano finalmente avere giustizia. Keira oggi ha 27 anni, giudica il trattamento a cui è stata sottoposta -blocker, ormoni, rimozione dei seni- “sperimentale nella migliore delle ipotesi, distruttivo nella peggiore” e crede che i professionisti abbiano […]
Leggi ora
10 Aprile 2024
UK. Rapporto Cass: mai più terapia affermativa per i minori con disagi legati al genere
Esce il rapporto finale sulle transizioni di minori della pediatra Hilary Cass: offrire la terapia affermativa è stata un fallimento. Non ci sono prove sull’efficacia di bloccanti della pubertà, che non dovrebbero essere mai prescritti, se non in rari casi particolari. Gli ormoni del sesso opposto non si dovrebbero dare prima dei 18 anni, e anche tra i 18 e i 25 andrebbe usata cautela. Uno spartiacque definitivo
È uscito stamattina l’atteso rapporto definitivo della Cass Review, una revisione indipendente presieduta dalla pediatra Hilary Cass sui servizi della sanità pubblica per bambini e minori con “disforia di genere”. La sua relazione finale e le raccomandazioni sono state presentate al NHS England. Ecco i punti salienti. La condanna per la terapia affermativa è definitiva, e determinata dalla assoluta mancanza di prove che bloccanti della pubertà e ormoni del sesso opposto portino reali benefici ai minori che soffrono per “incongruenza […]
Leggi ora
28 Marzo 2024
Terapie ormonali sui bambini: le assicurazioni dei medici cominciano a scappare
Troppo alto il rischio di richiesta di risarcimenti milionari da parte dei minori sottoposti a trattamenti irreversibili che si pentono della “terapia affermativa”: ecco perché alcune compagnie assicurative non si sentono più di coprire la “medicina di genere” con le loro polizze
Chi resiste al mercato della transizione di bambine e bambini non conformi al genere sa benissimo che quasi sempre il punto di svolta -com'è stato in UK con Keira Bell e negli USA con Chloe Cole- è la causa intentata da un'ex-bambina-o trattata-o con blocker e ormoni contro i medici che hanno somministrato la "terapia": la parte delle-dei detransitioner è decisiva. Allora la partita diventa soldi contro soldi: i soldi incassati dalle gender clinic contro quelli che si ritrovano a […]
Leggi ora
23 Marzo 2024
Anche in Wyoming stop alla transizione dei minori
È il 24° stato USA a mettere al bando i trattamenti farmacologici e chirurgici sui corpi di bambine e bambini non conformi al genere. Medici e operatori che continueranno a prescrivere la terapia affermativa perderanno la licenza. Decisiva per l’approvazione della legge la testimonianza -e l’azione legale- della detransitioner Chloe Cole. Approvata anche una norma che vieta il trans-indottrinamento nelle scuole
Dal prossimo primo luglio in Wyoming saranno al bando trattamenti ormonali e chirurgie di transizione di genere dei minori. Con l'approvazione della legge, il Senate File 99, il Wyoming si unirà agli altri 23 stati americani, dall’Alabama al West Virginia, che hanno vietato o limitato moltissimo la medicina di genere sui minori.  Secondo la legge medici, farmacisti e altri operatori sanitari che forniscono cure che affermano il genere potrebbero vedersi sospendere o revocare la licenza. Osteggiata dal governatore Mark Gordon, […]
Leggi ora
12 Marzo 2024
L'UK ha deciso: mai più bloccanti della pubertà ai minori con disforia. E' il giro di boa definitivo (in memory of Yarden Silveira, 1998-2021, ucciso dal "cambio di sesso")
Non solo lo stop alla Tavistock Clinic: in nessun centro britannico per bambine e bambini “non conformi al genere” si potranno più prescrivere puberty blocker. L’approccio dovrà essere unicamente psicologico: clamoroso giro di boa che avrà effetti a cascata in tutto il mondo Italia compresa. Sta per avere finalmente fine uno dei più grandi scandali della storia della medicina: qualcuno pagherà per le migliaia di minori irreversibilmente danneggiati? Ricordando qui uno tra loro che ha perso la vita a causa della spregiudicatezza di medici e chirurghi
Il Servizio Sanitario Nazionale Britannico (NHS) comunica che I BLOCCANTI DELLA PUBERTA' NON SARANNO PIU' SOMMINISTRATI AI MINORI CON DISFORIA DI GENERE: una notizia enorme e commovente dopo anni e anni di battaglie che abbiamo combattuto in prima linea. Quindi non solo chiude il servizio dedicato della Tavistock Clinic di Londra, ma in nessun centro per il trattamento dei minori con disforia si utilizzeranno più i puberty blocker. La decisione, definita "storica", avrà effetti a cascata in tutto il mondo, […]
Leggi ora