Zan draft law: calling things by their name

El verdadero nombre del proyecto de ley de Zan, bloqueado hace unos días en el Senado, debería haber sido "Proyecto de ley sobre la autocertificación de género" y no contra la homotransfobia. Ese era el verdadero objetivo, la autoidentificación, y por eso la ley se ha estancado. Sacrificar la legítima protección de las personas homosexuales y transexuales a la arrogancia del transactivismo queer.
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

Un breve comentario, tras archivar el proyecto de ley Zan sobre la homobi-transfobia, destinado principalmente a las hermanas y amigas no italianas que nos piden explicacionesand to the Italians who still do not understand what has happened.

Hace más o meno un año, el proyecto de ley de Zan contra la homobiotransfobia fue aprobado en la Cámara de Diputados en medio del silencio y la desatención general. En ese momento, The communication media completely overshadowed the debate., mientras que la ola Covid en curso -en Italia la campaña de vacunación aún no había comenzado- catalizaba la atención de la opinión pública. The centre-right had voted overwhelmingly in favourThis was not reflected when the project reached the Senate for final approval. Lo cierto es que la mayoría de las diputadas y diputados, como reconocieron posteriormente algunos de ellos (entre ellos Stefano Fassina), they didn't really understand what they were doing.. Convencidos de que votaban una ley contra los delitos de odio contra homosexuales y transexuales, no habían entendido que the real crux of the law was gender identity, the first step in the direction of self-identification.

En Italy there is a law in force, 164/82, no muy diferente a la inglesa Gender Recognition Act, que regula el camino hacia el "cambio de sexoun camino que termina con una sentencia judicial. Esta ley se ha ido actualizando a lo largo de los años mediante una serie de sentencias: por ejemplo, it is no longer necessary to have a legal mutilation in order to obtain a sex change in the documents. However, it is still necessary to go through the whole process, with expert opinions and a final judgment. What the draft law Zan pretended to introduce subreptically was the self-certification of gender or self-identification.

Los diputados, dijimos, no lo habían entendido. Muchos ciudadanos no lo han entendido aún hoy. Pero las feministas radicales sí lo hicimos, como se puede ver en la foto de arriba, que tiene más de un año. La lucha ha sido a brazo partido, y muy dura, sobre todo en dos frentes: 1. break the silence of the media 2. talk to the centre-right -the political arena of the vast majority of us- to introduce changes in the text of the draft law.

The first objective was achieved to a certain extent.Con mucho esfuerzo hemos conseguido "abrirnos paso", hemos hecho un gran trabajo en las redes sociales, hemos aparecido en los periódicos, hemos arrancado algunos pasajes en la televisión, nos han escuchado en el Senado. The second objective, talking to the proposers, we have completely failed.. Salvo contadas excepciones, No one wanted to listen to us or discuss with us, from the first signatory Alessandro Zan to the secretaries of the left-wing parties (PD, M5S, LeU), including the women from those parties.

Un muro infranqueable, una sordera absoluta, acompañada de un desprecio misógino: sois una minoría retrógrada, no representáis a nadie, etc.

Our objectives were well-founded and rational: apart from the gender identity refusal (Article 1)We demand that the law did not extend to the miserable hate -women are not a minority to be protected but the majority of humanity, and feminism has never called for such a law, sobre todo si la concedían los misóginos a favor de la gestación subrogada y el "trabajo sexual". We demand that the transactional propaganda is kept out of schools (Article 7) and freedom of expression is truly guaranteed (Article 4).

Including propusimos volver a un previous draft law (Scalfarotto-Annibali) that would have truly guaranteed the protection of homosexuals and transsexuals.

These arguments were reported and used by the left-wing parties and the moderates: it was really surprising to hear the to the conservative defenders to mention Judith Butler and transhumanism. But, as we have seen, they have also made incursions with an small part of the left-hand sidewhich finally did not support the draft law, which lacked the necessary numbers to go further in the Senate. This was our victory.

We have the well-founded suspicion that some of the same proponents wanted to put the brakes on the law, which by being adopted would open up really difficult scenarios to manage and justify before a public opinion that is mostly unfavourable to self-identification, but without knowing that this was the real objective of the draft law.

Y es una verdadera lástima que las personas homosexuales y transexuales no hayan conseguido la protección que pedían por culpa de la arrogancia del transactivismo queer: ellos son los verdaderos homófobos y transofóbicos.

Para nosotros y para todos, una lección: do not give up ever. Hoy se lo decimos especialmente a nuestras hermanas españolas y alemanas que luchan contra leyes similares. Nunca hubiéramos creído que podríamos hacerlo, with our own hands, against a corriente universal a favor del proyecto de ley, pero no nos dejamos desanimar y conseguimos nuestro objetivo, albeit con amargura. Y sobre todo, exigir que things are called by their name. We do not allow a law whose aim is to introduce self-identification to stand as something else, by embarking on the real objective through more rational and consensual proposals.

Cada vez que mencionen a la "identidad de género", agudicen sus oídos y prepárense a la lucha.

Marina Terragni (RadFem Italy, WHRC Italy)

translation Sara Punzo

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
5 July 2022
Women attacked from left and right: the ash on the head of the New York Times
As the organ of the liberals and woke culture, the great US newspaper has been undertaking a vigorous change of course for a few months now, admitting its own excesses and the misogyny of the new progressive course committed to wiping out women. While waiting for the self-critical wind to blow in Europe too
by Pamela Paul Perhaps it makes sense that women - complacent and pleasant-looking creatures, selfless and just as pretty - were the ones who finally brought our polarised country together. Because the far right and the far left have found the one thing they can agree on: women don't matter. The position of the right is best known, the movement has been aggressively dedicated for decades to depriving women of basic rights. Thanks also to two judges [...]
Read now
5 July 2022
Mayor Beppe Sala's 'gift' to Pride
From now on, in Milan, the birth certificates of children of 'homogenous couples' will be automatically registered, including those born from surrogacy. Although the law and subsequent rulings firmly condemn the practice and point the way to 'adoption' for the 'intended' parent. But the registry office is the responsibility of the State, not of local administrations. And the Milanese have never been asked about it: all the critical aspects of a unilateral and very glamorous decision that could also present profiles of unconstitutionality
'We have restarted the recognition of children born in Italy by homogenous couples': the words with which Mayor Beppe Sala announced his personal 'gift' to Pride initially caused some confusion. In fact, children born 'in Italy' on the initiative of - and not 'by' - same-sex couples are only the children of women united with other women. The children of male couples are born in Canada, California or other procreative tourism destinations, but not in Italy [...].
Read now
29 June 2022
School ends, forced withdrawals of children begin again
Despite a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Cassation defining the forced removal of minors as 'outside the rule of law', this morning in the province of Lodi an 11-year-old boy was snatched from his mother, who was forcibly and deceptively detained while her son was taken. Here is how the events unfolded in the account of a witness
This morning in the province of Lodi, in Casalmaiocco, an 11-year-old boy, Gioele, was forcibly snatched and suddenly and traumatically removed from the mother with whom he was living. Here are the facts as told by a MaternaMente activist present at the time: 'Deborah and her son had been summoned for a meeting by the social services this morning. The meeting took place online and the SS used reassuring tones. The mother then went to the municipality to [...].
Read now
27 June 2022
New England Journal of Medicine: abortion ban is a health catastrophe
The prestigious magazine raises the alarm: it will be mainly poor and black women who will pay the price of the Supreme Court ruling, driven back into abortion with serious health risks. Even the morning-after pill and even the IUD could be banned and prosecuted as abortifacient means
The US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization represents an extraordinary reversal (...) Yet it was not unexpected. In the long and painful prelude to the decision, many states severely restricted access to reproductive health care. The fig leaf covering these restrictions was that induced abortion was a dangerous procedure that required stricter regulation to protect the health of women seeking such care. The facts belie this false rhetoric. The latest data available in the United States [...]
Read now
27 June 2022
How they won the war against Roe
Failure to turn Roe v. Wade into law was the capital mistake of the American left, starting with Barack Obama. Abortion was an entirely secondary issue for trans-politics-absorbed liberals, who have spent years erasing the word 'woman' by renaming it as 'menstruator' and 'uterus carrier', rather than addressing women's rights
How did American pro-lifers win the war against Roe v. Wade? In the article of which we present you with extended excerpts, journalist Sarah Ditum explains how the Democrats' neglect and arrogance unwittingly helped set women's rights in America back 50 years. "When did it become certain that American women's right to abortion would be revoked? The Supreme Court's ruling that "Roe was terribly wrong from the start" leaked almost two months ago, [...]
Read now
25 June 2022
US midterm elections: will women be decisive after the abortion ruling?
What will American women do now? Will they win solidarity among themselves, as they have always won in Italy over abortion? Or will they settle into opposing sides in a quasi-civil war? The November vote will be the first test. Women could form the strong core of that moderate front that cannot find political expression in the US
What will American women do now? Will they win solidarity among themselves, as they have always won in Italy with regard to abortion, holding together Catholics and agnostics, left-wing and right-wing women in defence of law 194/78? Or will they settle into opposing camps, to put it mildly, the quasi-civil war underway in the United States? The midterm elections in November, with the Republicans as favourites, will be the first test: how many female voters, albeit [...].
Read now
1 2 3 ... 42