7 March 2021

A word of advice - if you will - to our LGBT friends. About the lawsuit I suffered

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

I am only mentioning this now, after the judge has ordered the case to be filed. I was sued by Alexander Schuster, a well-known member of the Lenford Network-Advocacy for Gay and Lesbian Rights. The subject of the lawsuit was a Facebook post in which I merely quoted (in inverted commas) statements made by a member of Arcilesbica, Giovanna Camertoni, about a stormy evening on the uterus for rent organised in Trento by Arcigay and Famiglie Arcobaleno.

Here is the post:

TRENTO, UTERUS FOR RENT: GIOVANNA CAMERTONI 
OF ARCILESBICA CENSORED BY ARCIGAY 
AND RAINBOW FAMILIES
On the evening of 26 April, an evening entitled "Gpa: beyond prejudice, the story" was held at the Santa Chiara centre in Trento, organised by Arcigay Trentino, Laici Trentino and Famiglie Arcobaleno. 
The evening was co-ordinated by lawyer Alexander Schuster, who is known for having assisted a couple who had used a surrogate mother in Canada and who were granted dual paternity by the Court of Trento in a controversial decision currently before the Supreme Court. 
Guests of the evening Serena Marchi, author of Mine yours theirs. Women who give birth for othersand Nicola Carone, with his Originally the gift. Donors and bearers in the imagination of homogenous families. 
Among the audience was Giovanna Camertoni of Arcilesbica, founder of the Anti-Violence Centre in Trento. 
Camertoni recounts the censorship he suffered as follows: '.I asked several times to speak, but Schuster would not give me the floor. After much insistence, I was given the microphone almost at the end of the evening. I began by recalling Europe's clear positions against the GPA, but Schuster kept interrupting me. I managed to continue my speech by pointing out that even where Gpa is legal, the black market is still being fuelled. I mentioned the case of the Netherlands, where despite regulation the number of couples legally accessing the practice is laughable, while procreative tourism to India is very high. 
At this point, a member of Famiglie Arcobaleno in the audience stood up and ordered me to give the microphone back immediately. Next to him was Paolo Zanella, president of Arcigay Trento. 
In twenty years of active militancy, I have never been intimidated and silenced. Nobody intervened to defend my right to speak, neither Schuster nor the guest writers nor anyone else in the audience. Somehow I still managed to finish my speech. Then the Rainbow Families representative returned to his seat and shouted at me to fuck off. Uncivil and offensive behaviour that, however, no one thought to stigmatise.
".

Solicited by Arcilesbica, in my post I simply and willingly exercised my right and duty of reporting. But Lawyer Schuster took umbrage.. I invited him to give his version of the facts if Camertoni's did not satisfy him, but Schuster declined the invitation and preferred to file a complaint. Not, as one might have imagined, against Giovanna Camertoni for her report, but against me who had simply reported it at her request.

Schuster's conflict with Camertoni was immediately resolved, while his conflict with me continued in the courtroom. and, as I said, it ended a few days ago with the dismissal. A few months ago, the Preliminary Investigation Judge had already ordered this, but Schuster opposed it, determined to have me sent for trial.

Now: that the complaint had no standing was quite obvious, although nothing is ever certain. But the fact is something else: a possible indictment of me (and for what? for honouring my professional ethics, which requires me to release a news item once in my possession?) in my opinion would have been a boomerang for Schuster, the Lenford Network and the world of LGBT activists. To be precise, a trial against me would necessarily have catalysed the attention of all those who fear that Zan's law against homobi-transphobia (passed in the Chamber and awaiting discussion in the Senate) may pose a danger to the free expression of opinions.

Incidentally - worse - the intention here was not to pursue an opinion, but a simple, completely unvalued account: in short, a chronicle. But in a democracy, the right to report is a rather important thing. I am practising this even now. In fact, if Lawyer Schuster had considered the report defamatory, he should have taken it out on those who had formulated it in the first place, and only secondarily, in this case, on those who had merely reported it, namely me. Instead, perhaps with the reasonable and appreciable intention of not opening conflicts within the LGBT world, Schuster decided to reserve his not benevolent attention to me.

Things ended well, and badly for him. But in my opinion, I repeat, it would have ended worse if I had been indicted. for the reasons I mentioned above: the media would scream the news, the headlines would talk about an attempt at censorship, a gag order and so on, to the detriment of the LGBT cause and the Zan law. Why was this not thought through before the lawsuit was filed and even opposed?

The true nature of the conflict is clearly and nobly political: I have been fighting for years, along with many others, against the surrogate motherhood, while Schuster and the Lenford Network, on the opposite side, defend, with varying degrees of success, the male couples who have resorted to it. But if a conflict is political - and here the reasons are very high - it is about the dignity of women and the non-commerciality of the human: as Schuster would know very well the Constitutional Court in its ruling 272/2017 strengthens the ban contained in Law 40 Article 12, paragraph 6, gives the surrogate mother a".high degree of disvalue"and reiterates that the practice "intolerably offends the dignity of women and deeply undermines human relations"- well, if the nature of the conflict is so highly and exquisitely political perhaps it would be a good idea to stay on the political level and not debase the issue into a lawsuit that could have resulted in a boomerang indictment.

It's good that things turned out this way and we'll see how to deal with it later. But I will say this, if it interests anyone: I am not afraid and I never will be. My fight for women and children, also in compliance with the law in force in our country and all over the world (except for about twenty nations out of more than 200) will never stop.

Marina Terragni


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
You can send to: ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE BLU BRAMANTE
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
1 May 2022
This is Georgia
Surrogacy, gender identity, motherhood: on many issues, the positions of the leader who now looks to the premiership coincide with those of feminism, snubbed by the left. What to do in the face of this challenge? Can the women's movement dialogue with the right?
Giorgia Meloni could become the first woman prime minister in our country. She no longer hides her ambition and if she knows how to do the right things by next spring - or rather, if she does not do the wrong things - and if she manages to escape the volleys of friendly fire, no less intense and insidious than enemy fire, she will be able to achieve her goal, having only herself to thank for the mistakes of her opponents: no one has co-opted her - see here - she has no master [...].
Read now
12 April 2022
Towards the abolition of surrogacy: an anthology and a debate
CIAMS publishes a multi-voice book against the uterus for rent and discusses it in an open webinar. In the meantime, in Italy, which is preparing to "welcome" the Fiera dell'Utero in Affitto (in Milan on 21-22 May), two bills are already being discussed that would extend the punishability of the practice even when carried out abroad. And a popular initiative bill is on the way
While in Italy we are preparing to "welcome" the Fair of the surrogate motherhood, scheduled for 21-22 May in a place still unknown - we will know only at the last minute - and in addition to the two bills already under discussion in the Commission of Justice of the Chamber of Deputies, proposals that call for the punishment of "surrogate motherhood even if carried out abroad, is preparing a draft law of popular initiative with a collection of signatures for a definitive stop to the practice - we will soon give details - next 28 April [...]
Read now
6 April 2022
There is a war in Ukraine. Do you go to Prague to rent wombs?
Sold as 'altruistic' - but with 'reimbursement of expenses' equal to Ukrainian rates - GPA could become a new business in the Czech Republic given the tragedy in Kiev, where children are not picked up by clients frightened by the conflict. With all-inclusive packages, including cultural attractions and good restaurants. Meanwhile, in Spain, a Supreme Court ruling reiterates the severe condemnation of the practice of "reducing women and children to merchandise".
A very recent ruling by the Supreme Court in Spain states that the surrogate motherhood violates the rights of mothers and children "treated as mere commodities", reiterating the ban. The High Court affirms that this type of contract "causes damage to the best interests of the child and an exploitation of women that is unacceptable" and violates the fundamental rights recognised by the Constitution and international conventions on human rights, and therefore "is therefore manifestly contrary to our public order". Both women and [...]
Read now
8 March 2022
8 March 2022 - 8 March 2023: Agenda for a year of feminism
Maternity, work, uterus for rent, gender identity, transition of minors, women's health, male violence, prostitution, politics and elections, women in the South, ecological transition: these are the issues we will be working on in the coming months, told in a meeting that you can see here. To take part in the work, write to radfemitaliarfi@gmail.com
Maternity, work, uterus for rent, gender identity, transition of minors, women's health, male violence, prostitution, politics and elections, women in the South, ecological transition. These are some of the issues addressed during the meeting attended by Alessandra Bocchetti, Monica Ricci Sargentini, Veronica Tamborini, Manuela Ulivi, Ilaria Baldini, Luana Zanella, Daniela Dioguardi, Marina Terragni, Assuntina Morresi, Elvira Reale. These are the objectives of the political work of the next few months: if anyone is interested in taking part in this work, choosing one of [...]
Read now
24 February 2022
Womb for rent fair in Milan: open letter to Mayor Sala
Scheduled for 21-22 May, the event will re-launch the GPA business after a slowdown due to the pandemic. But in Italy, advertising the buying and selling of children is a crime. We therefore call on the Mayor, the Council and the City Council to alert the police and to take any initiative against this blatant violation of the law.
To the Mayor of Milan Beppe Sala To the City Council We have learned that on 21-22 May Un Sogno Chiamato Bebè (A Dream Called Baby) will be held in Milan at the Spazio Antologico-East End Studios in via Mecenate 84. The fair is organised by the same promoters of the "salon", which has already been held in Paris, Cologne, Munich and Berlin, and is coming to Italy for the first time (see here and here). The aim is to relaunch a business, that of buying and selling children, a "sector" which at the moment is [...]
Read now
22 February 2022
Ukraine: there is also the drama of 'surrogate' mothers
Ukraine is Europe's baby-making factory: thousands are born every year. Today, in order to save the 'product' and the investment, the rich commissioners demand that pregnant mothers leave the country on the brink of war, separating from their families and children. Further violence against these poor and exploited women
Ukraine is on the brink of war. The world is on tenterhooks, Europe could be facing a conflict at home, those who can leave the country but there are also those who do not want to. Like Natalia, 29, a surrogate mother who called her lawyer the other day to find out if she could be forced to leave the country by the 'intended parents', the people who ordered her child. Natalia, the name is fictional, has a husband and children, for [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 20