18 February 2021

Those good progressive boys, fake friends of feminism

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

Radical feminism around the world is discussing the need to stop having illusions about the left's support for the women's movement. Today, indeed, the left-wing transhumanism (free sex work, free uterus for rent, support for gender identity, hormones to girls and boys and all the rest) is creating many problems for women.

Here an example of left-wing anti-feminism these days: the newspaper The Manifesto which reduces to a fight between envious hysterics (Carmen Calvo and Irene Montero) the split in the Spanish government over the Ley Trans. A impressive misogyny.

The second-wave feminism had already addressed the issue of relations with the left, distancing himself from it. Today, the wave has ebbed, and we are back to a supposedly natural feminism-left embrace. But the left only wants our votes and as we are seeing they give nothing in return. This happens everywhere in the world, but a large part of feminism hesitates to acknowledge it, often opening up painful conflicts between women. Here Meghan Murphy at Feminist Current. Happy reading.


The 'good guys' have long been a problem for feminism. The desire for allies and supporters has led women to value the men who preach well. In the West, a growing political polarisation that offers the appearance of only two options - left versus right - has left modern feminists with the impression not only that they have to choose, but that there is an easy and obvious choice. Give us Matt McGorry in a T-shirt".This is What a Feminist Looks Like"tell us to love abortions, and there you go too many feminists go into ecstasy. We should have learned the hard way, many times, that the guys who show themselves to be good with their political proclamations are often not only the least good, but the worst.

The truth is not that no man is good, but that, in my experience, it is the outspoken one, not the 'awakened' one, progressive in the political sense, that can be trusted.

In 1969, radical feminists split from the New Left, with Shulamith Firestone who announced: "Fuck you, lefty. From now on you can look at your own navel. We give life to our movement". Tired of the sexism of so-called 'comrades who are fighting the good fight against war and racism but still need coffee and photocopies, women have left the men of the left to fight their own fight. Why ally yourself in struggles with people who do not even respect women -those who create life, as well as half the population, and provide indispensable labour- as equal human beings? Yet modern feminists continue to cling to the hope that this time things will be different, that men who managed to avoid being caught talking about pussy-grabbing or who bravely support their girlfriends who are on the pill are allies. It can be difficult to come to terms with the fact that those who preach social justice do not necessarily have collective interests in mind, but it is important to look at reality, rather than at an imaginary ideal. Women always say this about relationships with men: you cannot force a person to change, and staying in a toxic or unhappy relationship based on the hope that things can be different is more often than not fruitless. These left-wingers have told us, many times, what they think about women's rights: why don't we listen?

Progressives defined TERF as feminists who support women's rights and believe that women's spaces and sport should be protected. They called us bigots and demanded that we be censored, fired, beaten. They made it clear that the rights of men who wish to 'identify' as women take precedence over real women. For a long time fight to legalise the sex trade, arguing that pimps, clients and brothel owners can operate with impunity because women and girls must have the "choice" to sell sexual acts to strangers. Feminists have been pushing to decriminalise women in prostitution but wish to stop the exploitation and abuse of those working in the industry - most of whom are there because of a lack of choice -. have been labelled as 'SWERF' (radical feminists who exclude sex work). The same men who want to exploit these women and girls - who delude themselves into believing that these women and girls want them - are also the ones who want to exploit them. turn us against them, claiming that we 'hate' prostitutes.

On both fronts, we are defamed rather than understood. Although the left really wants nothing to do with radical feminism, many radical feminists continue to cling desperately to the left, to the extent that they have torn the movement apart. Women are no longer siding with women, but are committed to being loyal to political parties, and reject the majority of women who want nothing to do with political debates as much as they want to be able to live their lives with peace and dignity and bring bread to their children. In other words, Feminism is failing women in the same way that the left is failing the working class. We are trapped in words and theory, and we are losing women.

Infinite Infighting among feminists has pitted those who reject left/right binarism against those who insist that any woman who does not vote left should be labelled a traitor and banned from the movement. Online feminists seem more interested in removing political impurity from the women's movement than in finding ways for women to unite for change. The hatred women spew against women deemed traitors has become stronger and more destructive than anything coming from men who simply don't like feminism (and who knows what that word still means).

I myself spent many years insisting that feminism was inherently a left-wing movement, and I could not imagine involving any man (or woman, for that matter) who did not identify with the progressive side of the political spectrum. But in the end I had to take note of the fact that women's rights are not partisan and that 'smart' men are not our natural allies. Now I work, talk and interact with anyone who is respectful and open to dialogue - a approach that many feminists and leftists see as treason.

We have a perfect example in Canada, with our sparkling-eyed leader who loves feminism so much he doesn't even know what a woman isand is afraid to defend an old statement of his that "prostitution itself is a form of violence against women". In 2017 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau strongly supported the passage of Bill C-16, Canada's gender identity legislation, the effect of which was to ensure that all spaces previously designated for women and girls became accessible to males who identified as trans women. His Liberal Party, together with the NDP - even more progressive- refused to help and recognise women in distress, and today what was foreseen has become reality, because violent men are in women's prisons, and homes that protect women from male violence are threatened with funding cuts if they reject men.

You would think that protecting vulnerable women from potentially dangerous men would be the priority of a proud feminist, but it is 2021 and The double standard dictates that supporting women's rights means supporting men's narcissistic desires. Hence the recent ridiculous male successes in women's sports.

That women continue to support politicians, ideologies and parties that refuse to uphold their most basic rights is astounding, unless one believes that women today have a range of privileges because they are white and cisgender, thus erasing their need for protection.

Last week I saw the inauguration of Joe Biden celebrated by women all over North America relieved that the Big Bad is gone. We're saved! I mean, Donald Trump has really been an asshole. But however unpleasant it may have been, it is hard to beat Biden's eager and immediate decision to sign an executive order mandating that 'sex' now includes sexual orientation and gender identity.

Even if we all have to compromise on who we vote for, I will no longer compromise in favour of politicians who pretend not to know what an adult human female is.

Biden promised us in the autumn that within his first 100 days in office he would pass the Equality Act which, as feminists warned, would essentially accomplish what his executive order will accomplish. So this action comes as no surprise, yet women voted for him anyway, insisting that anyone who was truly a feminist should do the same.

And while obviously Trump is not a feminist, and the choices for American voters are limited, he is nevertheless It is ridiculous to celebrate Biden's victory as some sort of victory for women. Especially considering his abject disregard for their rights.

Feminists have allowed themselves to be fooled by emotion, by their hatred of Trump blinding them to the fact that Biden, like many vouchersis a wolf in sheep's clothing. It's not that simple, Trump=bad and Biden=good. When we make difficult choices, as we are often forced to do in elections, we should not look at the personality of an individual but at his policies. A man caught doing pussy-grabbing could simply be the man caught doing pussy-grabbing. E the man who may appear more respectful or domesticated may be the man who will devastate the sexual rights of women.

I have said many times that I much prefer openly sexist men with whom you can at least have an honest conversation compared to the sneaky ones who insist that they love and respect women, but also say things like: respect your local sex worker by paying her for a blow job; how dare you say that transwomen are not women, you bigot.

Fuck those guys. Give us Trump, sportsmen, boors and schoolboys any day of the week. At least I won't be forced to deal with the grotesque (but transparent) enlightenment of some good guy who loves equality so much he wants to fight us in the ring. Offensive authenticity beats false respect any day of the week. And of course there is plenty of space in betweenmost people simply do not fit into the categories 'good' or 'bad', 'left' or 'right'. And when it comes to acting in the real world or in politics, we have to accept that labels and platitudes do not mean anything concrete.

I am no longer interested in the left or the right.I don't care what they call you, I don't care what you want them to call you. I care about doing what is right, rational and strategic. And sometimes that's more complicated than joining a party.

No politician is perfect: we have to choose on the basis of what matters to us. But, in both the long and short term, continuing to support those who cling to progressive mantras or causes at the expense of our rights, our protection, our freedom and dignity, is a bad strategy.. Choosing 'left' simply because of the label is too simplistic and naive nowadays. While sex remains binary, politics does not.

Meghan Murphy (the original article here)

(translation by Elisa Vilardo)


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
You can send to: ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE BLU BRAMANTE
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
5 October 2022
The Iranians are fighting for us too
Women in Iran are oppressed, violated and killed precisely because of their bodies as women. And their revolt could free everyone and everyone. Is'the woke West of'gender identity and 'freedom of the veil' ready to understand and support this revolution that blows for us too? Woman, life, freedom
In the uncertain and ever-changing geopolitical order of our time, in the midst of a global political agenda that from right to left forgets women, betraying, albeit in different ways, female exclusivity and the richness of sexual difference, the struggle of Iranian women has something epic, something moving. The killing of Mahsa Amini shows how the issue of the 'veil as freedom' is the quintessence of intellectual dishonesty, of logical fallacy, of an age-old lie. To 22-year-old Mahsa, the desire to 'feel the [...]
Read now
27 September 2022
Feminism and the Right
In response to Julie Bindel, who considers the wall erected by the transactivist left but also the risks of an alliance with the right: in Italy, the historical novelty -a right-wing woman premier, Giorgia Meloni- further complicates the picture. What to do then? What is happening in Spain over the horrible Ley Trans perhaps points to a good way forward for everyone
Julie Bindel and Harvey Jeni take the bull by the horns: given that for too long there has been no possibility of dialogue with the left, can radical and gender-critical feminism look to the right without taking risks? This is a theme that we in Italy are well aware of and that agitated the entire election campaign that ended with the landslide victory of a right-wing woman, Giorgia Meloni, who has never declared herself a feminist. The fact that today the right in Italy is [...]
Read now
20 August 2022
A POLITICAL HORIZON COMMON TO WOMEN OF ALL PARTIES
In the sign of Carla Lonzi forty years after her death: women voters and activists from all parties unite in the gift of a common 'unexpected programme', a horizon for a change of civilisation
"Will women always be divided from one another? Will they never form a single body?" (Olympe de Gouges, 1791) On the 40th anniversary of Carla Lonzi's death. We are women who vote for every political party. We live in every part of the country. We belong to every social condition. We are mothers and non-mothers. We have a faith, or we are agnostics, or atheists. We are held together by being women and the knowledge that what is good for a woman and her daughters/daughters is good [...]
Read now
25 July 2022
Open field, closed lists
The tiger's eye does not want to see that you can reassemble and recombine the line-up all you want, but if the faces and names remain the same you have very little credibility. And if the only goal recognisable to most of the electorate is to bar the way for your political opponent - for once a woman, which makes it all the more surreal - your chances of success are not very good.
Work is in progress on the construction of the large rassemblement or open camp (the wide one has been discontinued). The discussion is only between men (with the partial exception of Emma Bonino) and the cement that holds the coalition project together is 'stopping Meloni': there is little discussion of political programmes, and what Calenda, Fratoianni and Di Maio may have in common is all to be understood. Observers and sociologists of politics scoff to point out that building a project 'against' [...].
Read now
20 July 2022
Where is the Casa delle Donne in Rome going?
'The House we are all' reads the beautiful slogan of the historic enclave in Trastevere. But in that space, which is public and should be open, the#039;agibility is only transfeminist. And after the uncritical support for the Zan ddl -to stop feminicides-, the yes to the 'uterus for rent' and to 'sex work', now also the hymn to male ultra-bodies in women sports: maybe it is time for a reflection
The International House of Women in Rome agrees with the University of Pennsylvania's proposal to name Lia Thomas 'Woman Athlete of the Year'. Lia Thomas, of whom we have spoken several times here, is the famous swimmer who has repeatedly beaten her opponents competing in the women's categories, but who has at least had the merit of finally exploding the issue of male ultra-athletes in women's sports. The post shared by the International House of Women, a confusing little treatise on intersectional feminism, [...].
Read now
5 July 2022
Women attacked from left and right: the ash on the head of the New York Times
As the organ of the liberals and woke culture, the great US newspaper has been undertaking a vigorous change of course for a few months now, admitting its own excesses and the misogyny of the new progressive course committed to wiping out women. While waiting for the self-critical wind to blow in Europe too
by Pamela Paul Perhaps it makes sense that women - complacent and pleasant-looking creatures, selfless and just as pretty - were the ones who finally brought our polarised country together. Because the far right and the far left have found the one thing they can agree on: women don't matter. The position of the right is best known, the movement has been aggressively dedicated for decades to depriving women of basic rights. Thanks also to two judges [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 18