24 January 2021

Equality according to Biden: the right of men to call themselves women (and to win in all women's sports)

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

And Kamala? Nothing to say?


"On social media, women have expressed relief at the end of the Trump era. The Canadians also posted pictures of Kamala Harris and Jill Biden in clothes that represent progress. No true feminist would wear a black suit and red tie, after all. What America needs now are those jewel tones.

I can't understand what trauma we suffered from seeing an egomaniac tweet himself in Internet prison ... If anything, it offered us the cue for four years of dedicated progressive posts. Now what's next?

In any case, I am glad that all this division and polarisation is finally over. Both Canadians and Americans will have to come together to find something new to distract themselves with. Maybe this time it will be the mass surveillance and the end of free speech? Wait, no, I have a good one: the end of women's sport and gender-based protection?

The first thing US President Joe Biden did the day after his inauguration was to sign 15 executive orders including rejoining the Paris climate agreement and reversing a policy that blocks US funding for programmes abroad if they are linked to abortion. Not bad. He also enacted the obligation to maskerine throughout the federal territory, as well as on buses, planes and trains.

But the brave 100-day mask challenge (oh funny! It's like a game!) was not the only decision that allowed us to breathe a sigh of relief. Biden also signed a executive order to implement certain aspects of the Equality Act , il that sounds like a great thing, unless you are a woman hoping for equality under the law in 2021. Sorry, Karen. Equality is not for you. Put your mask back on.

The ordinance ensures that "federal statutes concerning sex discrimination prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity"and bypasses the tedious legislative process normally required to pass a law

But hey, we're talking about equality, boys. And who would ever vote against it! As far as I know, democracy only means that other people can decide what is good for you. Those who vote against things that are not 'good' are fascists.

Lest we be fooled into believing that an 'equality act' could be at least partly about combating sex discrimination, given that women make up half the population that has spent the last 100 years fighting for equal rights under the law, we are reminded that our status as a 'woman' is only important if you are the kind of woman who is a man.

LEquality Act of the origins, introduced in 1974 from Bella Abzug, actually sought to ban discrimination on the basis of sex (as well as sexual orientation and marital status), but as we all now know, thanks to Twitter fact-checkers, human beings have gone far beyond sex. Today we are a mass of amorphous 'them' (thes) whose rights are determined by the type of porn we prefer.

L' Equality Act of 1974 did not become law and was reintroduced in various forms over the years until today, when equality is still necessary, but not for chicks.

Today, the important thing to ensure equality is that mediocre male athletes are allowed to compete against girls and women so that they do not have to live with their male mediocrity. As such this 'Equality Act' guarantees that individuals cannot be discriminated against on the basis of their 'gender identity'. Which sounds good, because no one should be discriminated against: but in this case We use the term 'discrimination' to defend the right of men to claim to be women and to be treated as such.

You might ask yourself why men would want to be treated as 'women'. Well: to begin with, to have the guarantee that they will not be denied theaccess to abortion should they become hallucinatingly pregnant. But there are also other good reasons. One of which is that if these men found themselves accused of sexual violence they could avoid being locked up in prison with a bunch of violent guys. Right. Nobody wants that. The problem is that, as 'women', these men now have the right to be incarcerated in women's facilities, which means that female prisoners will be subjected to that male violence that nobody wants to deal with. Seems unfair, doesn't it? Too bad, Karen! This is equality!

What is really important in this act of equality, however, is create a playing field at the level of males who are not good enough athletes to compete with other male athletes. È fairer for them to compete against women who, due to their biology, are not as strong or as fast as male athletes. In fact women's bodies are different from men's bodies, but we are no longer allowed to explain howas material reality is not very polite and rudeness kills.

Men now not only can legally access women's facilities - including bathrooms, and changing rooms - but as 'women' they can also win sports competitions, competitions, scholarships and awards previously reserved for girls and women. Recognition they fully deserve, because the hardest thing about being a woman is being a man.

In October Biden has promised which would promulgate the Equality Act during his first 100 days as president. He is a good guy (that's why you voted for him, right?) And good guys keep their promises. So, he kept. None of this was a surprise, and now we can all celebrate this brave new world, relieved of the burden of free thought.

Personally I am relieved that the Americans no longer have a madman as president! Imagine if the leader of your country believed that males could become women by a simple declaration, and then enacted a law about it! LOL!".

Meghan Murphy, journalist and feminist gender critical and founder of Feminist Current

(translation by Marina Terragni).

Original article here.


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
29 February 2024
A new AGEDO?
The historic Parents of Homosexuals Association has worked extensively for the acceptance and non-discrimination of gays and lesbians and today dedicates many of its initiatives to children with gender dysphoria. With an essentially affirmative approach, that is, supportive of transition. In a recent webinar it was said perhaps one should break off relations with family members who object and that reasoning about the effects of puberty blockers is off topic. To mention just a few of the more surprising statements
AGEDO (Associazione Genitori Di Omosessuali - Association of Parents of Homosexuals) was an important organisation set up in 1993 on the initiative of Paola Dall'Orto, founder and president until 2007 and awarded the title of Cavaliere al merito della Repubblica in 2009 for her work: 'The aim,' she explained, 'was to help those parents who found themselves in the same situation as us: in a state of discomfort, often despair, and almost always ignorant about the subject [...] We thought we could help these parents to know what they were not [...].
Read now
25 February 2024
The 'milk' of men
The English National Health Service ensures that the milk produced by a male body -stimulated with ad hoc drug therapy- is as good for the newborn as that of its mother, who is wiped out. Minimising the risks to the child's health largely offset by the ideological and symbolic benefits. It is the transhuman, my beauties!
Men's 'milk' is a perfect example of what we call transhuman. Women's milk, on the other hand, is human, all too human, it is the perfect model of the enduring human, and therefore natural breastfeeding should be degraded, mocked, stigmatised as something to be ashamed of and kept hidden. In fact, it is even a useless and unethical act. On the contrary, promoting and magnifying male 'breastfeeding' shows plastically the way forward. According to the prestigious journal Pediatrics, organ of the American Academy of Pediatrics, it is 'risky' to define [...]
Read now
15 February 2024
How to convince progressives to give up gender
Terrified of transactivists and worried about sounding 'right-wing', left-wingers support the transition of minors even in the absence of studies showing that 'affirmative therapy' works and promotes the well-being of gender non-conforming girls and boys. "But everyone has a right to evidence-based medicine," argue some liberals determined to "break the spell". And they start DIAG -Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender- to convince democrats in the US and around the world that continuing on this path is wrong and dangerous. For children and for the left. An article by Bernard Lane
A new movement of US Democrats wants to find out how to break the spell of gender ideology and bring the party back to the liberal values of science and reason. Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender (DIAG) launched a project yesterday on X Space (Twitter) to commission research on how to more effectively reach out to left-wing voters who believe that science is now in favour of 'gender-affirming' medicalisation of gender non-conforming youth. "The only way to end this [...]
Read now
7 January 2024
New Hampshire: No more 'sex change' surgery on minors
The US state has passed a bill banning surgeons from performing operations on under-18 year olds such as the removal of ovaries and breasts for females and penises and testicles for males. The bill states that these operations violate the patient's 'informed consent' and points out that studies have not shown a decrease in the suicide risk of minors after the operations. On the contrary: the danger increases
New Hampshire is preparing to ban under-18s from undergoing sex-change operations. Last Thursday, the New Hampshire House of Representatives passed a bill to this effect, also with the help of some Democratic members. House Bill 619 prohibits doctors from performing 'any genital gender reassignment surgery', i.e. the removal of the uterus, ovaries and breasts in the case of women; testicles and penis for men, to anyone in the [...]
Read now
31 December 2023
Puberty should perhaps be stopped at ALL: Transhuman drift of the World Health Organisation
In a veritable Christmas blitz, the WHO announces that it wants to draw up new gender-affirming guidelines and sets up a panel made up of three-quarters transactivists in favour of medicalising children. Preferably all of them, even those who do not suffer from dysphoria. Because choosing what sex you are must become a universal right. An international petition calls for a halt to the initiative
A few days before Christmas, the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced that it will develop new guidelines on the 'health of trans and gender diverse people', with a focus on access to hormones and surgery (what it calls 'gender-inclusive care.) ') and legal recognition of gender self-identification (self id). The WHO also announced that it has formed a group to develop the guidelines. This expert group includes many World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) apparatchiks, including [...]
Read now
21 December 2023
UK: new guidelines for 'trans children' at school
No 'social' transition for primary school children. Careful assessment in other grades to ensure there is no 'social' influence. Parental involvement in every decision. Gender-segregated toilets. And an end to the Lgbtqai+ propaganda that for years almost exclusively ran affective and sex education classes. Look to the turnaround in the UK not to make the same mistakes
For years in the UK sex education in schools has meant Lgbtqai+ propaganda run by organisations such as Stonewall and Mermaids. The epidemic of transitions among minors, often facilitated by schools, convinced the Sunak government to intervene to regulate the issue with new guidelines. Today, when affective and sexual education in schools is also being discussed in Italy - moreover one of the main points of the Zan fu-ddl - looking at the English experience can be very useful to avoid making the same mistakes. [...]
Read now
1 2 3 29