10 March 2021

Constitutional Court: rainbow children law needed. But surrogacy remains a serious crime

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

Two judgments of the Constitutional Court -issued on 28 January, reasons announced in the last few hours-. They call on Italian legislators to devise arrangements which, in the name of the "best interests of the child", allow so-called "intended parents", including surrogate parents, to be recognised as parents in their own right, even in the absence of biological ties and even if they have committed a crime.

While rejecting as "inadmissible" the questions posed by the first section of the Court of Cassation concerning two controversial cases of "homogenitoriality", The Constitutional Court threw the ball back to the legislators: they are the ones who must offer a certain and unequivocal answer. We need a law, and we need it now.

A judgment of the Court of Cassation United Sections (12193/2019) had already clarified that the partner of the biological parent could not be transcribed tout court in the child's birth certificate-or as a parent-in order to respect the child's right to the truth about his or her origins, indicating as a solution to ensure emotional continuity the so-called "adoption in special cases'.

But now the Constitutional Court, while reaffirming that the surrogate motherhood constitutes a "high degree of disvalue"and recognising that the practice "intolerably offends the dignity of women and deeply undermines human relations" (judgment 272/2017), states however that adoption in particular cases is too slow and cumbersome a procedure and establishes too 'weak' a bond between child and adoptive parent.

The remarkable fact is that both judgmentsAlthough they concern different cases (a gay couple and a lesbian couple, surrogacy and assisted reproduction), what they have in common is that they are not one and the same thing. minimization of the mother, which in the second case is also sacrificed on the altar of the 'bigenitoriality'.

La Judgment No 33/21 concerns the case of two men married in Canada, one of whom is the biological father of a child born from a surrogate, while the partner is a simple participant in the "parental project'.. In Canada the child is registered as the child of both men, but in Italy the transcription of the birth certificate is not possible. The applicants request that the "intentional father" is recognised as a parent.

In the appeal the mother is never mentioned as the motherbut as "woman in whom an embryo formed with the gametes of an anonymous donor had been implanted'.. On the other hand, considerable emphasis is placed on the "will of the intending parent". And it emphasises the right of the child "to know their parents, to be brought up by them and not to be separated from them".when so-called surrogacy is based precisely on the separation of the child from its mother and in almost all cases on the anonymity and deletion of both the egg-producer and the pregnant woman, i.e. on the non-knowledge of the mother. Those female bodies are worth nothing, they are just matter and 'receptacle', as in the purest Aristotelian tradition, while the male 'intention' and will are everything and give form to that inert substance.

The Court indicates that 'ndecisions concerning the child should always seek "the best solution 'in practice' for the child's best interests, i.e. the one that best guarantees, especially from a moral point of view, the child's well-being". best 'personal care"". As if being deprived of the mother by a commercial contract was not the denial in principle of the "better personal care". Finally, he points out as a possible solution a "an effective and expeditious adoption procedure which recognises the full extent of the filial bond between the adoptive parent and the adoptee, once it has been ascertained that it is in the child's best interests". In fact, according to the court, adoption in particular cases "constitutes a form of protection of the child's interests that is certainly significant, but not yet fully adapted to the yardstick of constitutional and supranational principles". also because "it also requires the necessary consent of the 'biological' parent for its completion". Again, as if the status of 'intention' were equal to that of 'biology'. Biology, however, if it is downgraded here, has for years fuelled the growing business of assisted reproduction and surrogacy at the expense of adoption: a child of your 'blood' at any cost.

In conclusion "this Court can, at this stage, only halt, and duly give way to the discretion of the legislator, the identification of solutions capable of remedying the current situation of insufficient protection of the child's interests is now a matter of urgency".

La judgment no. 32 concerns a woman who is the mother of twins brought into the world by assisted reproduction. carried out abroad (in Italy, a single woman cannot have access to the practice) in agreement or 'parental project' with her partner. The twins are registered at the civil register office as the daughters of the biological mother, while the partner does not appear on the birth certificate. Following the separation of the two women, thea 'non-mother' partner turns to the Court of Padua to ask for legal recognition of her bond with the twins. The judges of Padua in their turn turned to the Consulta. The woman asked to be recognised as a parent on the grounds that she was "consenting to heterologous fertilisation"made by the partner, sharing the "Pma project"and denouncing the fact that "adoption in particular cases... was impracticable, since Article 46 of that law requires the consent of the adoptee's legal parent, which was denied in the present case"..

In this case, it is the mother's will that is being questioned. Here again a minimisation of the mother. But the will of the mother cannot be circumvented. A woman does not need any "consent"The principle of 'motherhood' cannot be violated by a man, even if he is the biological father, or by a woman who occupies the symbolic place of the father. The woman has the first and last word on motherhood, and this principle cannot be violated.

According to the applicant, however, 'would be violated the right of every child to have two people who assume responsibility for its maintenance, upbringing and education". Therefore "same-sex couples' LDC births, for which adoption is not possible in special cases, would be destined to a permanent status of single-parent childrennot recognisable to the other person who contributed to the procreative project". An astonishing passage: it is not clear what this "the right of every child to have two people"in addition to the damnation of being "children of one parent"if not the ideology of equal bigenitoriality on which the theories of parental alienation and of the bad mother distancing the child from the father are based. The claim here appears very similar to that of many separated fathers who accuse mothers of Pas.

The Court also dismisses as inadmissible the questions put by the Tribunale di Padova but invokes the initiative of the legislator by stressing ".the urgency of such action'. it is evident that "births as a result of heterologous fertility treatment carried out by two women are in a worse condition than all other births". And reiterating that "the continuation of legislative inertia can no longer be tolerated, so serious is the lack of protection of the child's best interests"indicates as a possible way forward "as an example... a rewriting of the recognition provisions, i.e. the introduction of a new type of adoption, granting, by means of a timely and effective procedure, the full rights attaching to filiation".

As for the "new type of adoption"it should be noted that any reform of so-called 'special case adoption' should apply to all and not as a fast track for same-sex couples. It is hard to see why the same preferential treatment should not also apply to heterosexual couples on the basis of a principle of justice: let us consider the very frequent case of a woman who is the natural mother of a child and wishes to have her child adopted by her new partner or husband. Why should she have to go through a long and painful process - the juvenile court, social workers, psychological interviews, and so on - while a person with a homosexual orientation could have access to a 'simplified' stepchild?

Finally, it should be noted that in the report on the opening of the judicial year First President of the Court of Cassation Mario Curzio had already dedicated a paragraph to the "new frontiers in parenting"(see here)

Marina Terragni

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
4 June 2023
CIAMS, STOP SURROGACY NOW, FINRRAGE, LA JAPAN COALITION and other associations. And together with them such eminent figures of international feminism as SYLVIANE AGACINSKI, GENA COREA and PHYLLIS CHESLER. Who together with us are asking the Italian parliamentarians to approve the law that will pass the Chamber of Deputies on 19 June.
Rete per l'Inviolabilità del Corpo Femminile (Network for the Inviolability of the Female Body), Radfem Italia, and FINAARGIT (International Feminist Network Against Artificial Reproduction, Gender Ideology and Transhumanism) have always shared the goal of the universal abolition of the surrogate motherhood. Together we support the bill on surrogacy that will be debated in the Chamber of Deputies next 19 June, which extends the punishability of the practice even if it is carried out in a foreign country and which is a decisive step forward in the direction of universal abolition, offering -if approved- a model for other legislations [...].
Read now
26 May 2023
This time it is: in the skin of children
Against the ruling of the Court of Cassation, which prevents the full transcription of birth certificates of children born from surrogacy by allowing only the biological parent to be named and indicating stepchild adoption for his or her partner, some male couples in Milan are undertaking a new form of resistance: not even registering the biological parent - or both or neither - leaving the child in an administrative limbo in which, in this case, he or she would be deprived of the most elementary rights, from paediatrician to school
After the Prefecture of Milan, in application of a ruling by the Court of Cassation, blocked the transcription of the full birth certificates of children born on the initiative of same-sex couples - indicating that only the biological parent should be transcribed and the stepchild adoption, i.e. adoption in special cases, which is perfectly legitimate, should be the only way forward - the municipality of Milan is experiencing this, according to the report by Roberta Osculati, PD vice-president of the City Council: same-sex couples [...].
Read now
4 May 2023
Baby Fair in Milan: something to hide?
A strict and detailed code of conduct imposed on those attending Wish for a Baby, an assisted reproduction exhibition. Strictly personal badges, a ban on filming and handing out flyers, the threat of expulsion, even appropriate clothing, bag searches and scanners. And uniformed or plainclothes policemen to keep watch. Why so much caution? Isn't this just an information event on the various techniques? Perhaps there will also be talk of surrogacy, the propaganda of which is a crime in Italy? Or are they just trying to frighten off those who intend to be there to peacefully protest against the reproduction market?
Those who have registered for the Wish for a Baby fair scheduled to take place on 20-21 May in Milan have received in the last few hours this strict and detailed code of conduct that they will have to strictly adhere to if they want to be admitted to the event. But if it is, as the website explains, a 'celebration of new life', meeting 'the best fertility experts from around the world', 'attending seminars' and obtaining information, why all these [...]
Read now
13 April 2023
Why 'asking' Schlein is a mistake
The open letter of 'one hundred feminists' to the PD secretary is based on false hopes: Elly Schlein will not change her positions on the uterus for rent. Nor on the other issues of the transhuman umbrella that the letter does not mention - starting with free gender identity - and that structure her Zan-transfeminist political identity. Is it worth adopting a begging posture?
We hope that the 'hundred feminists' who have written to Elly Schlein - and with a good part of whom we are in constant political contact - will be better off than us, who as the Network for the Inviolability of the Female Body during the primaries had asked for a meeting with the future secretary: not even a hint of a reply. Nor did we expect it, despite the long-standing acquaintance of some of us with her. We did not join the appeal of the 'hundred feminists' who intend to confront Schlein on motherhood [...].
Read now
2 February 2023
Birth from a dead 'surrogate mother
A professor at the University of Oslo proposes using the bodies of women in irreversible comas, which can be damaged without ethical complications, to carry out pregnancies for others. But also men in a vegetative state (so feminists don't get angry) by grafting embryos into their livers. And children? Theme not considered
It may have been inspired by Habla con ella, Pedro Almodovar's film in which the young dancer Alicia, in a coma due to an accident, becomes pregnant by Benigno, the nurse caring for her. Anna Smajdor, Professor of Medical Bioethics University of Oslo, takes up and elaborates on a suggestion made in 2000 by Israeli researcher Rosalie Ber "to circumvent the moral problems of gestational surrogacy" by using women in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) as surrogate wombs. To the practice she gives the [...]
Read now
16 January 2023
Italian psychoanalysts: stop puberty blockers
The Italian Psychoanalytic Society criticises puberty blockers for children: dangerous and experimental treatment. And joins gender critical feminists and parents in calling for scientific data and a public debate on the best treatment for children suffering from gender dysphoria
For years we gender critical feminists have been fighting against the scandal of the medicalisation of children in the name of gender identity. And for years we have been branded as fascists, reactionaries, bigots. Today at last an accredited Italian scientific society, the Italian Psychoanalytic Society (SPI), is taking a stand, joining us in raising a cry of alarm: the use of puberty blockers is an experimental treatment that has no solid scientific basis, and causes serious side effects. Above all, in most cases dysphoria [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 15