27 January 2021

With the 'right' to surrogacy, gays seek a place in patriarchy

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

Just today, 27 January, the Constitutional Court is due to rule on the right of a male couple who have resorted to uterus surrogacy to be recognised as both 'fathers' of the child. The orientation expressed in 2019 by a ruling of the Court of Cassation in United Sections was to allow the recognition at the registry office to the biological father onlyleaving open for the partner the possibility of resorting to the institution of theadoption in special cases, procedure to be instituted at the Juvenile Court. Awaiting the Consulta's pronouncement, a reflection on the issue of Lgbtq+ battle for regulation and free access to the 'surrogacy' market".

Within the gay community there is a strong tendency to homologation with heterosexual men and the male dominance system. I am not referring to hetero-normative roles, but rather to a disturbing phenomenon that, although it affects a small percentage of gay men, is claimed as a right by mainstream LGBT+ activism. I am talking about the GPA (Gestation For Others), better known as 'womb for rent', practice that allows single or partnered people to have a baby through the body of another woman who 'lends herself' as a pregnant woman.

"Every woman has the freedom to decide about her body," write gay activists under the dissenting posts of women opposed to the practice. 'To straight people, who are the majority, you don't say anything when they do it, do you, homophobic?" comment others. 'Because of you, we are going back to the history of the natural family, consisting of mommy and daddy masters,' sentence those with the rainbow flag as their Facebook cover.

Let us reason a little about these statements. Everything can be said about the practice of womb renting, except that women are free to manage their own bodies. This is not in fact the truth. Being to all intents and purposes a market, the 'intended parents' - whom I refer to as the buyers - want to be certain that the commissioned product will be returned without hindrance. I know it is sad to talk about an infant in these terms, but what do you expect from a form of commodification well embedded in the capitalist system?

Let us consider the contracts signed by pregnant women: the clause stipulates that for the nine months of pregnancy they may no longer dispose of their bodies, nor the right to abortion (which shamefully passes to the principals)nor of food, nor of the ability to move to certain places, nor to have second thoughts on what they agreed upon. 'But he signed,' one might object. So what? These are human beings, not automatons incapable of feeling emotions or experiencing changes and second thoughts during that time.

Rather, I would ask myself a series of questions: is this the freedom to manage one's own body? Signing a contract stating that you are no longer free to manage it in exchange for money? This seems a rather fallacious concept of freedom. While it is true that the 85% of commissioning is heterosexual, the fact remains that claiming the practice as an inalienable right is the rainbow movement. The natural family objection also does not hold water. An analysis of the patriarchal system would allow us to identify the so-called 'natural family' (or nuclear family) as the seat of all discrimination: misogyny, homophobia, racism, etc. The heterosexual family is the focus of male hatred and prevarication towards women. The father is the owner, the mother the means of production and the offspring the labour force. The male child must be virile, strong, heterosexual.

The means by which men have appropriated (and still appropriate today) women's bodies is the infamous rhetoric of bloodaccording to which you are only a parent if your child has the same DNA as you. Guess where such rhetoric is proposed? In the practice of the surrogate mother, in which the oocytes of a (tall, Aryan, intelligent) woman are used, which will be fertilised with the semen of the commissioning man and implanted in the uterus of the pregnant woman, of course after both have been bombarded with hormones to synchronise their menstrual cycles. It will not impart its genetic heritage, the pregnant woman will be a mere container, a shell without any rights, while the client, who will have passed on her genes, will be able to demand anything.

It may be that some gay men, as men, seek a place in the patriarchy, alongside the straight man. They do not want to break the chains of an unjust and violent system, but to tighten them even more in the illusion of 'equality'. Equality: a word that has taken on a positive meaning globally, but with which I associate only negativity. The homosexual liberation movement was born to free homosexual people from oppression, not to achieve oppressor privilege. More importantly, was not fighting to transform the privilege of a rich few into a right extended to all.

Vincenzo Postiglione, gay man against the uterus for rent

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
21 October 2022
Women-containers: pro-life and pro-utero for hire see eye to eye
For one and the other, the female body must make itself available to 'produce' the unborn child by renouncing the possibility of choice once pregnancy has begun. But a new life only really begins when there is a maternal yes: a fact that is unattainable and unattainable by law. Otherwise the only possibility is compulsion.
At least three things can be said about the bill filed by Maurizio Gasparri to amend Article 1 of the Civil Code and introduce into our legal system the recognition of the legal capacity of the conceived 'with the intention of preventing voluntary abortion in any form, whether legal or clandestine'. The first: it is highly unlikely that the bill will reach parliamentary halls. The immediate consequence of its approval would be the substantial inapplicability of law 194 because abortion would in fact be tantamount to murder. None of the majority forces [...]
Read now
4 October 2022
US, gay couple sues: surrogacy is a 'right', must be paid for by health insurance
The two men's claim aims to have the fact that they do not have a womb recognised as a 'disability': an absurd, envious and revealing claim. If they win in court all over America insurance companies and employers would have to reimburse gestations for other for men
A gay couple filed a lawsuit in New York labour court demanding that their employer-provided insurance company pay all the costs of the surrogate uterus for them, in order to ensure 'equal access to fertility treatment'. For all intents and purposes, they are demanding that a gay male couple become a protected category under the law because they are both without a womb and without access to one. If they win the case, in all [...]
Read now
27 September 2022
Feminism and the Right
In response to Julie Bindel, who considers the wall erected by the transactivist left but also the risks of an alliance with the right: in Italy, the historical novelty -a right-wing woman premier, Giorgia Meloni- further complicates the picture. What to do then? What is happening in Spain over the horrible Ley Trans perhaps points to a good way forward for everyone
Julie Bindel and Harvey Jeni take the bull by the horns: given that for too long there has been no possibility of dialogue with the left, can radical and gender-critical feminism look to the right without taking risks? This is a theme that we in Italy are well aware of and that agitated the entire election campaign that ended with the landslide victory of a right-wing woman, Giorgia Meloni, who has never declared herself a feminist. The fact that today the right in Italy is [...]
Read now
5 July 2022
Mayor Beppe Sala's 'gift' to Pride
From now on, in Milan, the birth certificates of children of 'homogenous couples' will be automatically registered, including those born from surrogacy. Although the law and subsequent rulings firmly condemn the practice and point the way to 'adoption' for the 'intended' parent. But the registry office is the responsibility of the State, not of local administrations. And the Milanese have never been asked about it: all the critical aspects of a unilateral and very glamorous decision that could also present profiles of unconstitutionality
'We have restarted the recognition of children born in Italy by homogenous couples': the words with which Mayor Beppe Sala announced his personal 'gift' to Pride initially caused some confusion. In fact, children born 'in Italy' on the initiative of - and not 'by' - same-sex couples are only the children of women united with other women. The children of male couples are born in Canada, California or other procreative tourism destinations, but not in Italy [...].
Read now
1 May 2022
This is Georgia
Surrogacy, gender identity, motherhood: on many issues, the positions of the leader who now looks to the premiership coincide with those of feminism, snubbed by the left. What to do in the face of this challenge? Can the women's movement dialogue with the right?
Giorgia Meloni could become the first woman prime minister in our country. She no longer hides her ambition and if she knows how to do the right things by next spring - or rather, if she does not do the wrong things - and if she manages to escape the volleys of friendly fire, no less intense and insidious than enemy fire, she will be able to achieve her goal, having only herself to thank for the mistakes of her opponents: no one has co-opted her - see here - she has no master [...].
Read now
12 April 2022
Towards the abolition of surrogacy: an anthology and a debate
CIAMS publishes a multi-voice book against the uterus for rent and discusses it in an open webinar. In the meantime, in Italy, which is preparing to "welcome" the Fiera dell'Utero in Affitto (in Milan on 21-22 May), two bills are already being discussed that would extend the punishability of the practice even when carried out abroad. And a popular initiative bill is on the way
While in Italy we are preparing to "welcome" the Fair of the surrogate motherhood, scheduled for 21-22 May in a place still unknown - we will know only at the last minute - and in addition to the two bills already under discussion in the Commission of Justice of the Chamber of Deputies, proposals that call for the punishment of "surrogate motherhood even if carried out abroad, is preparing a draft law of popular initiative with a collection of signatures for a definitive stop to the practice - we will soon give details - next 28 April [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 16