21 February 2021

Clara and the others, killed by men: Recalcati's analysis leads us astray

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

Since she was sure that this was how it would end, Clara Ceccarellikilled with thirty stab wounds in Genoa by the ex- who had been torturing her for over a year, a fortnight ago had gone to pay for her own funeral. He did not want to get his son and old father into trouble. She was hyper-responsible. She was strong and thought of everyone. She wanted, as they say, to leave things in place. This is the horror in which Clara lived. Her terrible loneliness, her resignation. She knew that nobody would help her.

Clara e le altre, uccise da uomini: l'analisi di Recalcati ci porta fuori strada

Since the beginning of the year Clara she is the 13th woman killed by a man because she was a woman, understood as something to possess or dispose of.

A few days ago The Republic video interviewed the psychoanalyst Massimo Recalcati on the theme of male violence (you can see it here). His analysis leads us astray. Better still: it continues to unnecessarily take us down the same road. Here are some of the things he said.

"Violence against women is racism, affects the woman as a place of the Other as is the case with the Jew, the black, the homosexual... Women embody the irreducible character of difference. Like the Jew, they are the embodiment of freedom. To suppress women is to suppress freedom'.

It is exactly the reverse. The dominance of men over women (Recalcati never uses this word, domain). is the original move. Racism, anti-Semitism and homophobia come after sexism and draw inspiration from that model. What emerges from Recalcati's words is theirreducible propensity to look at women as a minority, one of many. (disability is missing from the list, but the Zan law took care of that). This view is not waived. Jews, blacks and homosexuals certainly deserve justice, in Recalcati's view, as do women. But Understanding women as one of many minorities is a symbolic disaster that reproduces the conditions in which violence takes root. Women are the majority of humans, ontogeny confirms the primacy of the female human being. There are two differences, the woman is not exclusive. It is not she who is different from a prevailing human, the male. There is a male and a female difference. Recalcati's point of view remains phallogocentric.

"The fact that women are free is evident from their clothing. For men, clothing is the uniform, women have a more creative and generative relationship. There is no woman's uniform, the woman exceeds every uniform. There is a primacy of the phallus, a mental encumbrance that is expressed in competition, in performance. The woman is freed from the phallus, freed from this weight, she is freer... is aexception compared to the men's series.

Again: a normality arises -even to criticise it: the boredom of the male uniform, the heavy encumbrance of the phallus-. from which the feminine exceeds. Here we are again in full phallogocentrism: the masculine as the human norm, the feminine as the eccentric, the exception, and so on. At the end of this road is theabmaternal breast mentioned Julia Kristevathere is being a woman as an ontologically marginal condition though here magnified as better and even enviable. The mechanism is reproduced intact, even with the best of intentions. Nothing about that movement envious of women's capacity to give life, on which the huge patriarchal construction was built.. At that feeling of being expelled with one's male body from the female genealogy. On the furious divide and rule -body and spirit, flesh and mind, form and substance, nature and humanity- in order to change the rules of the game and produce a reversal: she will be the one who will be expelled and have to stay out. The climax is in that penis envy theory reversing womb envy and solemnly inaugurating the end of patriarchy. We women are not familiar with that envious feeling; we are all familiar with the perversion of male domination.

"Curbing violence is like learning a language...tonguing is the essence of male violence, depriving of speech... One should learn from poets. We need a sentimental education... The problems come when the sexual body separates from love. I would have the poets read, the great literature".

Here, too, a reversal. If anything, it is the language of the domain that is learned. The first language of every man and woman is the one patiently taught by the mother. Shortly after weaning and identification, the baby male is initiated into the pact between men based on the abandonment of the mother tongue and the contempt-domination of women, starting with the beloved mother. It is not enough to read the poets, not even Amor Cortese. Re-education and deconditioning of the violent male does not work if not as convenient alternatives to punishment. The problem, the male questionis that identity which is centred on the domain. The challenge is to be able to be men by betraying the pact and renouncing that device. Violence is only a function of envious domination, it serves to reaffirm it, it is the tip of the iceberg. The iceberg is the domain.

"In macho violence there is always a paradoxically pedagogical impulse: teaching women how to be women.... in exchange for a supposed identity (conferred on the woman, ed.) power is exercised over the woman'.

In truth the identity at stake is male, not female. In the pedagogical intent of violence (in simple terms: in teaching it a lesson) it is the male identity that reasserts itself as incapable of structuring itself on anything other than domination and the theft of female power.

In conclusion: Recalcati's considerations offer a good essay on how phallogocentrism works, which in its 'good' version (of those good guys Meghan Murphy talks about) admits back into the system what it had had to exclude in order to establish itself and must continue to exclude, in a kind of endless loop. In short, here we see a inclusive phallogocentrism.

The questions that every man horrified by male violence has to answer today are these: What am I if I renounce dominion? What do I put in its place? How do I stand without it? And how will I escape punishment from other men for betraying the pact?

Marina Terragni

UpdateI did not expect answers from Massimo Recalcati. Even in the sense that I did not feel the need to. I imagined he would ignore. But apparently the anger at what I wrote - to be precise: that I had taken the liberty of writing - was such that it produced this formidable acting out

Clara e le altre, uccise da uomini: l'analisi di Recalcati ci porta fuori strada

Many of his astonished followers asked him about this apodictic aphorism, halfway between a Baci Perugina motto and an Mra outburst, but there was no way around it. More: Prof. Recalcati followed up his outrage by blocking and banning left and right on his Facebook page (gives an excellent account of this here Monica Ricci Sargentini).

It must be inferred that: feminism is his, he manages it and he explains it to you.It is called mansplaining and this is a known phenomenon. And that there is good feminism -the one he likes- and there is 'ideological feminism', the one that doesn't give him the ola.

More: Recalcati speaks to me but does so obliquely, and contemptuously does not mention me. Or does not recognise me. As he would say, rips my tongue out. But always as he says strapping the tongue is the essence of male violence, depriving of speech. But always as he says in the video interview, today women are talking. Especially when it comes to saying what a woman is, which they understand.

Indeed, I am a woman, a feminist, and I speak.

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
27 March 2023
Is violence structural to transfeminism?
Paola Pieri, from the group MaternaMente, recounts the violence she suffered in Florence from trans activists
Text by Paola Pieri, of the group MaternaMente. Last Thursday, 23 March, I went in front of the Careggi hospital, here in Florence, where a small garrison called by 'Resistance to the nanoworld' was being held, attended by Silvia Guerini, author of the book 'From the neutral body to the post-human cyborg, critical reflections on gender ideology'. Presidium called in such a place because it is where dozens of minors and others with 'gender dysphoria', treated with puberty blockers, hormones and other planned [...].
Read now
16 January 2023
Italian psychoanalysts: stop puberty blockers
The Italian Psychoanalytic Society criticises puberty blockers for children: dangerous and experimental treatment. And joins gender critical feminists and parents in calling for scientific data and a public debate on the best treatment for children suffering from gender dysphoria
For years we gender critical feminists have been fighting against the scandal of the medicalisation of children in the name of gender identity. And for years we have been branded as fascists, reactionaries, bigots. Today at last an accredited Italian scientific society, the Italian Psychoanalytic Society (SPI), is taking a stand, joining us in raising a cry of alarm: the use of puberty blockers is an experimental treatment that has no solid scientific basis, and causes serious side effects. Above all, in most cases dysphoria [...]
Read now
7 November 2022
Belgium, new feminicide law. To be studied
In Europe, male violence is the leading cause of death for women between the ages of 16 and 44. Belgium equips itself with a new law that for the first time legally defines feminicides in order to develop policies based on official statistics. Keeping in mind that violence is a device of male domination
Stop the slaughter of women. This is the meaning of the new 'law on the prevention of and fight against feminicides, gender-based crimes and the violence that precedes them' adopted at first reading in the Council of Ministers on 25 October in Belgium. Deposed by the Secretary of State for Gender Equality, Sarah Schlitz (Ecolo/Verdi), the framework law for the first time legally defines feminicides in order to develop combat policies based on official statistics. And in [...]
Read now
29 August 2022
A video every 10 minutes
The brutal murder of Alessandra Matteuzzi, hammered to death by her ex-boyfriend, is the perfect representation of every feminicide: the murderer is not someone who loses control, but one who restores it. Her death serves to restore the balance lost as a result of the abandonment. Violence is a function of domination. It's here that one must keep one's gaze to be able to stop it
The killing of Alessandra Matteuzzi, the Bolognese woman murdered by her ex with a hammer and an iron bench, is the plastic and perfect representation of the dynamics of every feminicide. Giovanni Padovani is not crazy, he is not a drop-out, he is a young man in perfect shape, integrated in the world, even a testimonial for campaigns against violence against women. In short, you would never have guessed it. Alessandra is subjected to constant and unprecedented harassment: she has to justify every movement, every breath, [...].
Read now
31 March 2022
Carol, killed 5 times
The murderer, the mass media, a comedian: the overkill on Carol Maltesi's body was general. A mass BSDM game, a supplementary spectacle of the dead being torn to pieces. A snuff movie from life. After all, she was a porn star. She had it coming.
Carol Maltesi, the young woman brutally murdered and hacked to pieces by banker Davide Fontana, was killed five times. The first time, by the pornography industry -online and then also live shows- from which the girl had been captured during the lockdown to be able to provide for herself and her son, whom she had given birth to when she was just 20 years old. The second time by her tormentor, for whom we are looking for -as usual- reasons: he killed her [...].
Read now
15 March 2022
Twenty years of feminicides in Milan: a study
The research, conducted by the Institute of Forensic Medicine on 200 cases of murdered women, identifies certain constants and aims to contribute to 'putting an end to feminicide'. Even if the real solution is only one: the end of male domination.
The journal Science & Justice (volume 62-2, March 2022, pp. 214-220) published the study "Twenty years of femicide in Milan: A retrospective medicolegal analysis" (you can read it here). The study was conducted by Lucie Biehler-Gomez, Lidia Maggioni, Stefano Tambuzzi, Alessandra Kustermann, Cristina Cattaneo, the research team affiliated with the Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology and Odontology (LABANOF) of the University of Milan and/or the Sexual and Domestic Violence Service (SVSeD) of the Policlinico [...].
Read now
1 2 3 ... 13