Uterus for rent a universal crime: the left against

The first day of the debate on the bill signed by Maria Carolina Varchi closes as expected: oppositions against it -with different positions between the PD calling for the status quo to be maintained and +Europa wanting a regulated GPA. Main arguments against: the rights of rainbow families and the possible unconstitutionality of the rule. Here a summary of the speeches and an'interview with constitutionalist Silvia Niccolai
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

Yesterday saw the first day of debate in the House on the bill on the uterus for rent crime signed by Maria Carolina Varchi and others.

The entire discussion can be reviewed here.

The debate on the general lines closed with the announcement of the Submission of preliminary questions of constitutionality by Federico Gianassi of the PD and others, and Magi-Della Vedova of +Europa.

The House saw more or less what was expected: the majority in support of the bill, the opposition against, with some differences: +Europa (but even, in the square, the CGIL new rights) calls for a law regulating GPA, while the PD wants to keep things as they are, uterus for rent a crime only if carried out in Italy. A few votes in favour of the bill might escape from the left, but the substance is this.

A summary of the discussion:

after an introduction by presenter Varchi, Riccardo Magi of +Europa argued at length against the decree, claiming among other things that -violating the principle of self-determination- the law would be against 'the dignity of women'. (i.e. against her freedom to rent out her womb) as well as constituting a legal abomination. Marco Grimaldi of Verdi-Sinistra Italiana said that the bill would constitute the 'worst homophobic law in history'affirming the right of LGBT people to become parents, and mentioning Michela Murgia according to whom getting pregnant does not mean being a mother. Also for Grimaldi the ddl is 'a legal abomination'. Children born of GPA, he said, "unlike all the others are really wanted".

For Marina Aliprandi Marchetto of FdI the uterus for rent highlights "a balance of power in favour of the world's wealthiest class."She described at length the perinatal mother-child relationship, expanding on maternal-fetal microchimerism and reiterating that separating the woman from the creature is barbaric. For her, GPA is 'one exploitation that takes us back to slavery, as well as one of the most absurd contradictions of our time'.

According to Federico Gianassi of the PD the law does not stand from a legal point of view and is 'pure demagogy'. Stefano Candiani of the League mentions the Gestlife case, the agency that guarantees the replacement of the child should it die in the first two years of life, speaks of the risk of species selection and manipulation of the limits of nature only to pander to desires that are not rights.

Benedetto Della Vedova of +Europa says that wealthier people will not be affected by this rule and that children born with GPA will be subject to stigma. He assures that this 'reactionary flagship regulation', if passed, would be deleted in the future, and urges those who are presenting it to stop. For Laura Boldrini, PD, Italy has become 'Melonia', country forging relations with dictators and wanting to stop rights. It claims that the parents would end up 'in prison' and the children 'would be abandoned'. The sole purpose of the rule, he says, is discrimination against LGBT people.

According to Andrea Quartini of M5S the bill is 'violent and anti-scientific' and also risks jeopardising heterologous fertilisation, since 'commercialisation of gametes is a crime' but there are no donors in Italy. Luana Zanella of the Greens-Italian Left, opens her speech with a harsh and articulate invective against the GPA and its 'business that will reach USD 129 billion in 2032', but concludes by stating that the ddl is only a manifesto law without any consequences for the phenomenon. Lastly, says Zanella, 'the problem of the transcription of birth certificates formed abroad is not addressed'.

Alessandro Zan, PD, defends the 'solidarity GPA' and considers the bill unconstitutional. In his opinion, the ddl is just a weapon of mass destruction to hit LGBT families and reduce Italy 'to Orban's Poland and Hungary'. Chiara Appendino, M5S, speaks of a law 'against gays, lesbians and transsexuals' and announces an amendment 'for full adoption and not in special cases' (?)


On the question of possible unconstitutionality of the decree, we questioned costitutionalist Silvia Niccolaia professor of Constitutional Law at the University of Cagliari who has long studied the issue of gestation for others:

could the so-called universal offence of surrogacy be unconstitutional?

"On the contrary, there are good reasons to believe that it is a solution fully compatible with our constitutional order, which, moreover, is without prejudice to the political assessment as to whether it should be adopted'.

What reasons?

"First of all the hypothesis of punishability in Italy for acts committed abroad is provided for in general by the Criminal Code (Article 7) and is already operative: e.g. for crimes of sexual violence and human trafficking. In these cases in accordance with international conventions, but the presence of a prior international convention is not required by Article 7'.

Could this also apply to gestation for others?

"GPA consists of the planned separation of a child from its mother at birth and the exercise by adults of a complex of powers over a defenceless creature. According to our constitutional order, as well as the vast majority of countries in the world and the guidelines of many international bodies, this is an inhuman practice. Academic discussions about women's right to self-determination and sympathy for those who want a child at any cost must not conceal that, in reality, the reality of things, GPA is a trade in children and parental status. Given the seriousness and nature of the phenomenon there are, at least in principle, prerequisites for national criminal law to be applied to acts committed abroad as is already the case, for example, for crimes of exploitation of prostitution. In particular the cross-border structure of the phenomenon, which is realised through so-called procreative tourism, may make this solution seem reasonable and proportionate'.

Could the law also retroactively affect those who have already had children through surrogacy?

"Evidently not. Every child already born (or rather already only conceived, perhaps already only commissioned up to the day the new provisions come into force) will not see its commissioners affected by the new provisions. Even after the possible entry into force of the new rules, violation of the prohibition would not in itself affect family statuses and/or ways of acquiring them: the biological parent would of course remain the biological parent and the intended parent would remain obliged to take the necessary steps to fulfil his or her commitments towards the child (today: adoption in special cases). It is undeniable that, in fact, the knowledge of facing a sanction might discourage the intending parent from taking these steps, but the argument, as they say, 'tries too hard'. It forgets many things: those who undertake GPA under the new rules would be fully aware of the consequences they face both to the child and to the system; the The purpose of the new law is to discourage people from engaging in GPA so that no more children are born from this practice. There is no right to become parents, much less to become parents with GPA. There is no hiding the fact that the subject of children's rights is often invoked to legitimise GPA. I personally believe that precisely a clear stance against the phenomenon, such as the one represented by the proposal under discussion today, would make it easier for the legislator to regulate the position of children born of GPA, developing the very accurate solutions identified by case law'.

Is there not a risk that the new law is discriminatory?

"The ban already in place does not discriminate and applies to all those who have recourse to GPA regardless of their sexual orientation. As such, its extension would not be discriminatory'.

Could this law also cover women who resort to heterologous fertilisation abroad?

'In no way. The woman who undertakes the heterologous procedure is the same woman who will become the mother of the child to be born, while the so-called 'surrogate' mother obliges herself to let the creature she has given birth to be taken away. They are two different things'.

What about So-called 'altruistic' GPA"without any compensation (very rare cases)?

"As the Court of Cassation recently clarified (S.U. judgment 28162/2022) the 'fundamental value of human dignity' is offended in both caseswhich is why GPA is prohibited by our legislation 'in any form whatsoever''.

According to some, it is pointless for an individual state to 'universalise' the ban: if anything, the government should work in international fora.

"The one does not exclude the other. On the contrary: it is evident that a universal ban in Italy would greatly strengthen our country's ability to act influentially in international fora. This is also testified by existing initiatives for the creation of the universal offence, which are numerous and without political colour: recently (Casablanca Declaration of 6 March 2023) a hundred signatories from 76 different countries called on states to 'sanction people who resort to GPA on their territory; sanction their citizens who resort to GPA outside their territory; work towards the adoption of an international legal instrument leading to the universal abolition of GPA'".

MARINA TERRAGNI


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
29 February 2024
A new AGEDO?
The historic Parents of Homosexuals Association has worked extensively for the acceptance and non-discrimination of gays and lesbians and today dedicates many of its initiatives to children with gender dysphoria. With an essentially affirmative approach, that is, supportive of transition. In a recent webinar it was said perhaps one should break off relations with family members who object and that reasoning about the effects of puberty blockers is off topic. To mention just a few of the more surprising statements
AGEDO (Associazione Genitori Di Omosessuali - Association of Parents of Homosexuals) was an important organisation set up in 1993 on the initiative of Paola Dall'Orto, founder and president until 2007 and awarded the title of Cavaliere al merito della Repubblica in 2009 for her work: 'The aim,' she explained, 'was to help those parents who found themselves in the same situation as us: in a state of discomfort, often despair, and almost always ignorant about the subject [...] We thought we could help these parents to know what they were not [...].
Read now
22 January 2024
Men IntintA and other wonders
The health of 'Marco', a trans FtM who is five months pregnant with testosterone, and that of her baby are the least of the problems. What matters to the liberal press talking about an 'anthropological revolution' is whether 'Marco' is to be called mother or father. But only a woman can give birth even if at the registry office her name is male. In this nothing has changed since the dawn of time. In the meantime, the trans front is losing ground: in one year, the number of members of WPATH, the largest transgender health organisation, has fallen by 60 per cent.
La Repubblica online headlines with a triple somersault about the 'young man who got pregnant': pregnant is not dared even at the transphilic GEDI group. The story is that of 'Marco', a girl undergoing testosterone therapy to look more like a man: beard, graver voice -not to 'become male' because sex cannot be changed and every single cell will remain damned XX-. 'Marco' had retained his uterus and ovaries and following a hetero sexual relationship (a [...]
Read now
19 December 2023
When abortion is violence
A large number of abortions can be explained by the irresponsibility and 'running away' of men. "For whose pleasure am I aborting?" wondered Carla Lonzi. But this male violence is never mentioned and women continue to be blamed. As the ProVita do with their proposal to force them to listen to the fetus' heartbeat
Admittedly, I told ProVita's Maria Rachele Ruiu in all frankness that forcing a woman intending to have an abortion to listen to the fetus' heartbeat is not an admissible proposal. It is a senseless, sadistic, punitive and probably unconstitutional idea that would probably only have the effect of encouraging clandestine abortion. Perhaps the proposal will never go on the table and will remain mere propaganda. Bad propaganda though. Once again in the crosshairs there [...]
Read now
15 December 2023
Trials and rapes
The questions asked in the courtroom to the alleged victim of sexual violence by Ciro Grillo and his companions are very reminiscent of the tone of the defence lawyers in the famous 1979 'Rape Trial'. The formidable harangue of Tina Lagostena Bassi, plaintiff's lawyer in that case, explains why these interrogation methods were - and remain - unacceptable. Let's listen to it again
It is worth re-reading and possibly re-listening to -the award-winning film Rape Trial, 1979*, you can see it again here in its entirety- the formidable harangue of lawyer Tina Lagostena Bassi, plaintiff's counsel in defence of a young woman raped by four men who had lured her to a villa in Nettuno under the pretext of a job offer. The trial ended with a conviction but the defendants received conditional release. It is worth listening to that harangue again because in the words [...]
Read now
4 December 2023
Misogynists out of public service
Teo Mammucari's engagement on 'Dancing with the Stars', starring in one of the most offensive shows ever against women, with a 'mute assistant' -Flavia Vento- boxed in plexiglas and methodically mocked, casts doubt on RAI's effective commitment against violence and machismo. And it obliges citizens to contribute to the cachet of those who have offered such a degrading image of women
To the RAI Board of Directors to the President MARINELLA SOLDI to the CEO ROBERTO SERGIO to the RAI Parliamentary Supervisory Commission The feminicide of Giulia Cecchettin marked a point of no return in the collective conscience on male violence: the only possible precedent is the Circeo crime. RAI represented this moment of pain and political awareness by manifesting its intention to mobilise permanently against misogyny and machismo. For this reason we are surprised, offended and saddened by the engagement to [...].
Read now
30 November 2023
Born of a surrogate mother
Olivia Maurel, 32, was born to a surrogate mother and today she is fighting on the front line against the practice, which she describes as 'atrocious' and 'monstrous'. She always knew something was wrong with her family. She suffers from depression, has had problems with alcoholism and has attempted suicide several times. Only recently has she discovered the truth about her origins and that she suffered the trauma of abandonment. "To no child," she says, "should what happened to me ever happen again."
Commercial or 'altruistic' surrogacy must be abolished. These are the words of Olivia Maurel, born in December 1991 in Kentucky by traditional surrogacy (i.e. in which the oocyte also belongs to the 'surrogate mother', ed.), who recounted her experience in a conference at the parliament of the Czech Republic. Today, married with two children in Cannes, 'proud to be a feminist' as we read on her X page, she fights against surrogacy. Her testimony, very valuable as there are still very few [...]
Read now
1 2 3 24