If social networks silence gender-critical women: interview with Alessandra Asteriti

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

(The interview was carried out as part of the activities of SeNonOraQuando Genova, a feminist association with a ten-year history committed to raising cultural awareness for the recognition of women in society at all levels, for their fair representation in decision-making roles, and for the elimination of violence against them.).

The name of Alessandra Asteriti, teacher of International law at Leuphana University of Hamburg, appeared in the Italian public debate last December 2020, when his speech entitled "Gender identity is against women". was published by Concita De Gregorio in his column on The Republic.

In the letter, Asteriti testified how having taken -for two years now- the a critical stance on the concept of gender identity had exposed her, both in academic circles and on social media (especially Twitter), to accusations, threats and heavy ostracism of various kinds.

Shortly after its release on La Republicdespite the great solidarity and support expressed by many women for the contents of the letter, Alessandra Asteriti's Twitter account has been suspended. Subsequently, some queer associations approached the university where Asteriti teaches asking for an official distance from the management than the opinions expressed by the teacher. Finally, within a couple of months, Asteriti also had her Facebook account deactivated.

We decided together with Alessandra to carry out this interview because it is very worrying that so many women are systematically censored on social networks. His testimony deserves to be disseminated and debated, not only with regard to the issue of gender identity, but because the story is exemplary and opens up an important and serious question on the freedom of expressionlaw fundamental which in a democratic state must be guaranteed to every citizen.

Alessandra, can we say that we are facing a censorship operation against you? What are the official reasons that Twitter and Facebook have given you to justify the closure of your accounts?

I received no explanation from Facebook. Twitter informed me that I had been suspended for "hateful conduct". [hate behaviour, ed.] and specifically for this tweet

Se i social network silenziano le donne gender critical: intervista ad Alessandra Asteriti

[Translation: "Let's remember that in 2015 300,000 women around the world died in childbirth. What will it take to stop this trans madness?", ed].

To explain the context, the tweet referred to a British case concerning the allocation of funds to finance a research project to implant wombs in trans women (i.e. biologically male people). My comment was intended to emphasise how dangerous it is, even from the point of view of the decisions that are made by a government in the area of research funding, substitute gender for biological sex: In this way, strictly female pathologies or health problems become something of a minority, because not all people who identify themselves as women suffer from them. As with other trans issues, it seems that the needs expressed by this group must always take precedence over the needs and demands made by women. So yes, I would say that women - like me, there are so many - are censored and silenced. if they allow themselves to express criticism of gender ideology, but also just of bringing attention to women's issues. Or, even more worryingly, when they explicitly refer to issues such as the male violence or the patriarchate understood in a non-inclusive sense.

From 2018 to date, the number of women "silenced" by Twitter for expressing gender critical positions is staggering. What is your take on the politics of these platforms? What are the interests at stake?

I think it depends on the platforms. And then I don't want to do any dietrology or talk about conspiracies. Of course, I wonder why this movement has achieved such goals in such a short time. Until a few years ago, the idea that biological sex was not a reality easily would be considered absurd and offensive. towards women, who are the victims of sexism.

Who in Italy contacted you after your letter to De Gregorio and what kind of feedback did you get?

Mostly negative feedback, as I expected, and as I told Concita. I have been suspended from Twitter again, permanently and, since the Better Business Bureau is no longer available, with no possibility of recovering an account that I also used for work. The suspension this time was again motivated by 'hateful conduct', but for a tweet in Italian: that's why I'm sure it's related to my article on The Republic. The tweet, just to give an idea of how restricted women's right to speak in this field is, was as follows:

Se i social network silenziano le donne gender critical: intervista ad Alessandra Asteriti

As regards the academic environment, both at Italian and international level, what is the atmosphere regarding these issues? Is there any debate? Have you received solidarity from colleagues?

The climate is absurdly limiting. A human rights colleague of mine working in Britain, an absolute expert in the field, told me that he had never seen a climate of terror as for gender ideology: said on the phone, because he was afraid to talk about these things via email. This is to say. Debate is impossible. Not only do colleagues ignore you and try to limit your ability to talk about these things (hence no invitations to lectures, papers rejected for publication, etc.) but also students feel entitled to send you emails and messages telling you to shut up, asking the university to take a public stand against you, staging protests to prevent you from attending seminars.

Students at my university in Germany (I should stress), after accepting an invitation to a debate, accused me of treating trans people as sub-human. That is I was accused of behaving like the Nazi regime behaved with minorities. I asked my university to support my right to speak and my academic freedom, but so far I have had no reply. I have also received threats both on Twitter and on the university email. The university removed my address and photo from the university website, but did not volunteer any support. No public solidarity from colleaguesbut it must be considered that especially women are afraid. A male colleague of mine, when I confided in him that I had received death threats, replied by email that although he defended freedom of expression he was of the opinion that we should all be more open to trans lifestyles. It's pretty self-explanatory, I think.

Your critique of the concept of gender identity is, of course, articulated from the perspective of law, your field of research. What are the implications of the introduction of the concept of gender identity in international law?

This question would require an essay, and in fact I am thinking of writing an article, but I already know that it would be very difficult to find a magazine willing to publish it. In short, the women's rights are based on genderas well as the discrimination that rights were introduced to combat. Replacing sex, which is an identifiable and recognisable biological reality, with gender identity, a concept that is undefined and unknown to many women and rejected by others (especially feminists, as it is based on a stereotyped and sexist version of women) inevitably has repercussions. In law, definitions are essential, especially if positive rights are derived from them. Changing the definition changes the criteria for deciding to whom these rights belong. This is in general.

Then, of course, if the definition of a woman is no longer linked to biological sex, it becomes almost It is impossible to decide when a certain behaviour, whether of the state or of an employer, is discrimination or not. If there are women who do not need leave because of breastfeeding, or pregnancy, or other problems related to women's health, it becomes much more difficult to prove that the employer has discriminated against the woman worker because she is a woman. Finally, all spaces and services that are reserved for women become by necessity open to men as well. This is if the self ID becomes law, but in some countries also without a specific law, simply because organisations such as the Stonewall spread a misinterpretation of the current law. Thus, to give just one example, men convicted of rape were put in women's prisons, where they committed further sexual violence, because they claimed to be women (no hormone treatment, or operation).

I would like to close by saying that this is a movement that is based on an absurd conception of reality, according to which what one thinks one is is more important than what one really is. But that only applies to sex, at least for now. We don't allow anyone to take ten years off their birth certificate because they feel younger or have had a facelift. Or to declare themselves black if they are not, or disabled if they are not. It seems that the only open ontological category is that of sex, especially the female sex, where, as the advertisement said, the word is enough. Just say I am a woman and you are one. Meanwhile, girls are still forced to undergo hormone treatment, mastectomy and hysterectomy in order to hope to be recognised as men. Like all male chauvinist ideologies, gender ideology is fought on women's bodies. and maintains the penis as a symbol of power. Except that it turns from a penis into a female penis (the famous girldick). In short: the penis is dead, long live the penis.

Emanuela Risso, SeNonOraQuando Genova

The interview was carried out as part of the activities of SeNonOraQuando Genova, a feminist association with a ten-year history committed to raising cultural awareness for the recognition of women in society at all levels, for their fair representation in decision-making roles, and for the elimination of violence against them..


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read about them elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding. If you think our work can be useful for your life, we would be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

Please send to: BLU BRAMANTE CULTURAL ASSOCIATION

OBLIGATORY REASON: FEMINIST POST

IBAN: IT80C02008129140001048385


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
20 May 2024
Why Italy did not sign the EU declaration on LGBTIQ rights (it did sign another one though)
The declaration against homolesbobtransphobia signed in Europe by all the member states passed into silence. Great media clamour, on the other hand, over a second declaration not signed by Italy because it is strongly unbalanced on gender identity on the model of the Zan fu-ddl: here are all the critical points
A few days ago, on the occasion of the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia (IDAHOT) in Europe, the following resolution was passed unanimously - including Italy, therefore: 1498th Meeting of the Committee of Ministers (7 May 2024) - EU Statement ahead of the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia on 17 May 2007.05.2024 Press and information team of the Delegation to the COUNCIL OF EUROPE in StrasbourgI have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union and its [...]
Read now
16 May 2024
UK: gender identity will no longer be discussed at school
A new crackdown by the Sunak government after the Cass report, which also warns of the risks of social transition of minors, the so-called 'alias identity' that has already been adopted by many Italian schools: in the classroom, it will no longer be taught that one can change sex and sex education will be calibrated according to age. And never without parental consent
After years and years of transactivists from associations such as Stonewall and Mermaids making the rounds with their sex education courses in English schools of all levels, Rishi Sunak's government announced today with Education Minister Gillian Keegan new mandatory guidelines for schoolchildren and students on these issues. Classrooms will no longer teach that you can change your gender identity, as has been the case until now [...]
Read now
14 May 2024
From Gaza to western delivery rooms, Judith Butler sees fascists everywhere
Fascists, of course, we gender-critical feminists too, 'allies of the right and the Vatican'. The Californian intellectual, renouncing all philosophical subtlety, compiles a political agenda that coincides with the platform of the university students in struggle. And he calls for an alliance between trans people, antifa, the pro-Pal movement, the homeless, black people, migrants and even women - understood as one of many minorities - to build 'a radical democracy inspired by the ideals of socialism'. An account of the Bologna leg of his triumphant European tour
Perhaps today one could speak of the 'Butler Agenda': its platform coincides perfectly with the platform of struggle of the-students throughout the West, with little certainty as to whether the chicken or the egg was born first. Certainly Judith Butler is to all intents and purposes the mother of Gender Theory to which these student(s) (a minority anyway) enthusiastically adhere; in turn these student(s) with their mobilisations are a source of inspiration for Butler, their platforms are also a [...]
Read now
6 May 2024
Trans surgery increases suicide risk
A very recent study of 90 million patients shows that trans-operated people run a 'significantly higher risk of suicide, death, self-harm and post-traumatic stress disorder' and require psychiatric support. Thus, the completion of the long and arduous transition with 'affirmative' surgery does not ensure the achievement of the hoped-for well-being
"Gender affirmation surgery is associated with a significantly higher risk of suicide, death, suicide/self-harm and post-traumatic stress disorder than control groups in this real-world database. Since suicide is one of the most common causes of death among adolescents and middle-aged individuals, it is clear that we must work to prevent these unfortunate outcomes. This further reinforces the need for comprehensive psychiatric care in the years following surgery for [...]
Read now
5 May 2024
Saman: 'their culture' as a mitigating factor
The girl's marriage was 'arranged and not forced' and in the judgement 'the culture of the offender must also be taken into account': the reasons for the sentence (signed by female judges) for the brutal murder of the young Pakistani girl leave one bewildered. As well as the mother's self-sexism that would be the material executor of the crime. At this rate, according to Unicef projections, girls will continue to be sold to men for at least the next 300 years
Pictured is a poster with Saman's face composed of photos of many women victims of male violence. The story of Saman Abbas is an open wound. Killed by her family three years ago, her concealed body found more than a year after her death. At the beginning of this year, the funeral, with great public participation. A few days ago came the grounds for the verdict in the first-instance trial of Saman's family last December: life imprisonment to [...].
Read now
3 May 2024
A few words to Mr Gennarone (he doesn't deserve any more)
The essence of fascism is to prevent anyone from speaking out. Whoever calls a woman ****** intends to intimidate, devalue and above all silence her. Ergo: a sexist cannot call himself an anti-fascist because sexism is incompatible with antifascism.
A few words to rapper Gennarone, author of fine lyrics (e.g. 'Stile foggiano, la mia terra la amo, dall'appennino dauno alle terre del Gargano. Take my hand ready for the journey through the land we live in') who during the 1 May concert in Foggia among many other things said that 'Italy is living in the shadow of fascism thanks to that ***** of Giorgia Meloni'. Just to remind him that: a) the essence of all fascism and totalitarianism is to prevent anyone from [...].
Read now
1 2 3 59