31 December 2022

New NO from the Supreme Court to the registration of 'two fathers' from surrogacy

For the second time, the Supreme Court reiterates: those birth certificates drawn up abroad cannot be registered by Italian registry offices. For the biological father's partner, the only way is adoption. Surrogacy remains a high disvalue and violates the dignity of women. Mayor Sala should immediately stop transcribing them, as requested in our complaint
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

Judgements must be read carefully because the devil, so to speak, is in the details. But no doubt that the The United Sections of the Supreme Court, in its judgment 38162 filed yesterday, once again rejected the request for full and automatic registration of birth certificates of children born abroad by surrogacy, allowing only the indication of the biological parent at the registry office.

The question was very simple. In short: should the birth certificate drawn up in Canada of a child born through surrogacy at the initiative of two men be transcribed in its entirety, indicating not only the biological father but also the so-called 'intended father'? The answer of the Supreme Court is equally simple (NO)in line with another Supreme Court ruling in 2019.

As for the partner who has shared the project -and the contract- of resorting to gestation for others and is not the biological parent, the only possible way to be recognised as a parent in turn remains an application to the juvenile court (adoption institution in special cases).

Moreover, in line with Law 40 and all subsequent rulings, Yesterday's pronouncement repeatedly reiterates the condemnation of surrogacy as a high value and as a practice that 'intolerably offends the dignity of women and deeply undermines human relations'.

A serious setback for the claims of 'surrogates'.

As mentioned, the path of adoption in special cases had already been indicated by the 12193/19 judgment of the Supreme Court in United Sections, and is therefore reaffirmed. The first important consequence is that all registers that with an autonomous decision are proceeding with the full and automatic registration of these birth certificates performed abroad -for instance, that of the Municipality of Milan- shall immediately suspend such registrations, already contrary to the provisions of public policy and subsequent rulings: thecomplaint against the mayor of Milan Beppe Sala recently filed by the Network for the Inviolability of the Female Body finds further grounds in yesterday's ruling.

We expect the mayor to draw the inevitable consequences.

It is true that in 2021 the Constitutional Court found the instrument of adoption in special cases to be not entirely adequate and indicated the need for Parliament to legislate on the issue of these birth certificates, balancing the aim of discouraging the use of surrogacy with the child's interest in affective continuity. The new ruling is in line with this approach. But as things stand, Parliament has not yet legislated and in the meantime the institution of adoption in special cases has been reformed (Constitutional Court 79/22) and made fully legitimate, hence adequate.

More problematic is the passage in the judgment where it is argued that in the name of the child's best interests, the judge could give his or her consent to adoption by the biological parent's partner even if the biological parent disagreed: a delicate juncture that would probably concern a very small number of cases and could in any case lead to a flood of appeals.

The fact remains that Yesterday's verdict, which greatly disappointed the rainbow lawyers -and is the subject of some press interpretations that are, to say the least, fanciful and tend to minimise the defeat, such as this from the Corriere della Sera- unequivocally reiterates its condemnation of the uterus for rent and once again denies the possibility of automatically transcribing such birth certificates, a denial that continues to be a strong disincentive to resort to this practice.

While waiting for Parliament to legislate, if it intends to do so, regulating the issue of birth certificates and possibly considering the possibility of prosecuting surrogacy as a criminal offence even if carried out abroad.

Marina Terragni

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
30 November 2023
Born of a surrogate mother
Olivia Maurel, 32, was born to a surrogate mother and today she is fighting on the front line against the practice, which she describes as 'atrocious' and 'monstrous'. She always knew something was wrong with her family. She suffers from depression, has had problems with alcoholism and has attempted suicide several times. Only recently has she discovered the truth about her origins and that she suffered the trauma of abandonment. "To no child," she says, "should what happened to me ever happen again."
Commercial or 'altruistic' surrogacy must be abolished. These are the words of Olivia Maurel, born in December 1991 in Kentucky by traditional surrogacy (i.e. in which the oocyte also belongs to the 'surrogate mother', ed.), who recounted her experience in a conference at the parliament of the Czech Republic. Today, married with two children in Cannes, 'proud to be a feminist' as we read on her X page, she fights against surrogacy. Her testimony, very valuable as there are still very few [...]
Read now
9 November 2023
13 November in The Hague against surrogacy
The Private International Law Conference is pushing for transnational recognition of gestation per se contracts with the intention of forcing national legislation to benefit biomarket profits. The Icams coalition against GPA organised a demonstration in defence of women's dignity and against the market in girls and children
The International Coalition to Abolish Surrogacy (ICASM) organised an international demonstration in front of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) on 13 November to oppose the regulation of cross-border 'surrogacy'. Indeed, attempts are being made to impose international regulation of so-called 'surrogacy': as of 13 November, the HCCH will set up a working group with the task of drafting a convention to allow cross-border recognition of contracts. This is to meet the growing demand in the biomarket [...]
Read now
24 October 2023
At the urgent request of PPOO Minister Eugenia Roccella, the deadline set for the UDI to adapt its statute to allow men to join as well slips by 180 days. In the meantime, the powerful Schlienian Igor Taruffi, transfeminist councillor for Welfare and head of organisation of the national PD, will have to explain which passage of the circular on the reform of the Third Sector justifies his attack on female separatism
At the insistent request of PPOO Minister Eugenia Roccella, the Emilia Romagna region has granted an extension of 180 days to the UDI associations of Modena, Ferrara and Ravenna to adapt their statutes to allow men to register (we have told you about this here), statutes that UDI Bologna has in fact already modified for some time (2020) The deadline for modifying its statutes, under penalty of being expelled from the register of Third Sector Associations (RUNTS), has therefore been extended from [...].
Read now
11 October 2023
Only women? Can no longer be
In 10 days' time -on 21 October- the UDI Emilia Romagna could be deleted from the Third Sector register unless it agrees to register men as well. This is how the left attacks women's political spaces - starting with the historical association linked to the Resistance - in the name of the trans-feminist 'inclusiveness' promoted by the PD. A huge risk for all feminism. They cannot win
Women's spaces under attack. Not only the physical ones - changing rooms, sports, shelter homes, hospital wards, prisons - but also the symbolic and political ones. If you don't admit men, close down and disappear. Incredible and exemplary is what is happening to UDI, Unione Donne in Italia, an association that has been active for almost 80 years historically linked to the left. Many of the UDIs in Emilia-Romagna are at risk of imminent cancellation from RUNTS, the single national register of the Third Sector, simply for the fact [...]
Read now
21 September 2023
Open letter to Health Minister Schillaci: medically assisted procreation does not increase the birth rate. On the contrary, it is among the causes of the demographic winter
Free homologous fertilisation and a €1,500 ticket for heterologous fertilisation: the minister announces new measures that would help stem the birth crisis. But it is the exact opposite: the more we feed the illusion of being able to postpone the birth of a child ad libitum - the results of PMA are poor: in more than 8 out of 10 cases it fails - the fewer children will be born. There is only one way: infertility prevention. Starting with correct information against the propaganda of the reproductive biomarket
Dear Minister Schillaci, we learn from press reports that as of 1 January next year the National Health Service will provide homologous fertilisation services free of charge and that it has established a co-payment for heterologous fertilisation - the responsibility of the region - which is expected to be around 1,500 euro. The provision would be part, according to him, of the measures against the birth rate in our country: less than 400 thousand births in 2022, the lowest number since the unification of Italy to date. In reality, as he explains [...]
Read now
18 September 2023
The new PD proposal on surrogate children is wrong: here's why
The idea is a facilitated 'rewarding' path -only four months- for the adoption of children born by gestation for others: a quasi-automatism that instead of counteracting it would encourage recourse to the practice. Moreover, a difference is made between this type of adoptee -GPA clients- and all others for whom the timing would not change. But the Constitution wants us equal before the law
The PD has deposited in the Senate -first signatory the cathodem Alfredo Bazoli, deputy vice-president of the PD group- a bill that provides for a 'special adoption' so-called 'affective' for the children of hetero or homo couples born from uterus for rent. Basically, it accepts the procedure of adoption in special cases of those born by Gpa for the 'intentional' parent, but calls for it to be accelerated to arrive at a ruling within four months. The court, therefore, the text reads, "shall verify whether the [...]
Read now
1 2 3 21