11 December 2021

Open letter to the Mayor of Milan and his Council: why the 'two fathers' should not be transcribed

The transcription of the birth certificates of children born from a surrogate motherhood circumvents the ban on the practice, gives precedence to a private interest - based on a commercial contract - over the public interest, and authorises the father to blatantly lie about the filiationis status - if a mother did so she would be prosecuted for forgery. Are we therefore unequal before the law in violation of Article 3 of the Constitution?
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article






The use of surrogacy or surrogate motherhood is a criminal offence almost all over the worldThe practice is only permitted in some 20 countries out of more than 200.

In Italy, the prohibition is expressed by law 40 - art. 12, paragraph 6 - and confirmed by the Constitutional Court. (judgment 272/2017): a ruling in which, in addition to reaffirming that surrogacy "intolerably offends the dignity of women and deeply undermines human relations"as for the transcripts of the birth certificates of these children claims that "cannot be contrasted with the favor veritatis the favor minorisas the false recognition infringes the child's right to his or her own identity".

Also with reference to this judgment, in 2019, the Court of Cassation denied the possibility of transcribing a measure issued by a foreign court in the Italian civil status registers which recognised as father the partner of the biological parent of a child born from a surrogate mother's womb, indicating as a possible route to filiation the so-called adoption in special cases.

Subsequently, the Constitutional Court (judgment 33/2021) indicated that "the identification of solutions capable of remedying the current situation of inadequate protection of the child's interests is imperative", calling on the legislator to take a decision on the matter, a decision which has not yet been taken.

On the basis of the latter judgment the Court of Milan has recently held that, since the legal loophole persists, the Municipality of Milan is obliged to transcribe the birth certificate of a child born abroad through a surrogate by the will of two men, there being no need for adoption "because the parental relationship is formed directly with the intending parent" (?).

The transcription orders by the Court would be 2.

Like Network for the Inviolability of the Female Body (RadFem Italia, Udi, Arcilesbica, Se Non Ora Quando Sister and many other national groups, international associations such as Women's Human Rights Campaign and CIAMS and hundreds of individuals, including Luisa Muraro and others from the Women's Bookshop of Milan) in 2019 we have already brought the issue of the inappropriateness of these transcriptions to the attention of the Milan City Council and obtained a stop to themand indicating the path of adoption in particular cases. A few weeks later, the United Sections of the Court of Cassation ruled in favour of the Milan City Council in its choice.

today we go back to asking

the Municipality of Milan to continue to resist these injunctions, which we consider to be completely arbitrary and which would further encourage the practice of surrogacy - which, again, in Italy and practically all over the world is a serious crime - by facilitating the process.

In particular we observe that by complying with the Court's requirements the Municipality would be agreeing to let - on the basis of a commercial contract - a private interest prevail over the public interest, which is the one stated in the law and reaffirmed by the above judgments.

We would also like to point out that the transcription of this birth certificate would constitute an open violation of Article 3 of the Constitution, which requires us to be equal before the law, and as such would be appealable.

If a woman were to lie to the civil registrar, albeit 'for the sake of the child', about the biological paternity of her child, she would be liable to prosecution for forgery.

"Imprisonment [from five to fifteen years] shall be imposed on any person who, in the course of drawing up a birth certificate, alters the civil status of a newborn child by means of false certification, false attestation or other falsehood". (Article 567 of the Criminal Code).

This is reiterated in the aforementioned judgment 272/2017 of the Constitutional Court, which states that "cannot be contrasted with the favor veritatis the favor minoris, since false recognition infringes the child's right to his or her own identity".

In the case of the 'two fathers' the lie is self-evident: the biological father indicates another man as his father, which is unrealistic. -or as a mother a woman who is not a mother. But according to the Court of Milan, not only should he not be prosecuted, but he should be prosecuted. should even be recognised in the exercise of his 'special' right (based, let us repeat, on a private commercial contract).

This right is therefore misogynistically unequal: the mother is always obliged to tell the truth about the child's origins, an obligation from which the surrogate father is dispensed.

We therefore propose, paradoxically, that if the Municipality of Milan were to comply with the judgment of the Court of First Instance, under Article 3 of the Constitution the possibility of lying about the status filiationis be allowed to all, especially ALL, by decriminalising forgery.

Network for the Inviolability of the Female Body

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
2 February 2023
Birth from a dead 'surrogate mother
A professor at the University of Oslo proposes using the bodies of women in irreversible comas, which can be damaged without ethical complications, to carry out pregnancies for others. But also men in a vegetative state (so feminists don't get angry) by grafting embryos into their livers. And children? Theme not considered
It may have been inspired by Habla con ella, Pedro Almodovar's film in which the young dancer Alicia, in a coma due to an accident, becomes pregnant by Benigno, the nurse caring for her. Anna Smajdor, Professor of Medical Bioethics University of Oslo, takes up and elaborates on a suggestion made in 2000 by Israeli researcher Rosalie Ber "to circumvent the moral problems of gestational surrogacy" by using women in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) as surrogate wombs. To the practice she gives the [...]
Read now
30 January 2023
GenerAzioneD, Italian association of parents of minors who define themselves as 'trans', is founded
A guidance and information site to support and accompany mothers and fathers going through this complex experience: testimonies, interviews, and links to contribute to an in-depth debate that today does not find space in the mainstream media
The cultural, apolitical, non-denominational and non-profit association GenerAzioneD has been established. The association's primary aim is to inform about the problems of gender dysphoria/incongruence in children, adolescents and young adults. Through the dissemination of testimonies, news, national and international articles in translation and the promotion of opportunities for discussion, GenerAzioneD aims to foster the transparency necessary to ensure the best possible care for those affected. GenerAzioneD was in fact born from the meeting of some parents who shared the experience of having children [...]
Read now
24 January 2023
The problem is not rooming-in but the loneliness of mothers
After the sad story of the baby who died next to his mother at the Pertini in Rome, for some the solution is to keep the babies in the nurseries and not in the room. But rooming-in was strongly advocated by women who used to be separated from their babies in hospital. It is, if anything, a question of allowing new mothers to have a spouse or wife to assist them. Especially in times of understaffing
Starting with the very painful case of the newborn baby who died at the Pertini hospital in Rome -probably by accidental suffocation, the judiciary will ascertain the causes: it could also be 'cot death' or something else- many and many conclude that rooming-in is a dangerous and wrong practice and that babies should stay in nurseries. I remember, however, that in the past women fought hard for rooming-in and for more than obvious reasons: not to be separated from the newborn after the long cohabitation [...].
Read now
24 January 2023
Sex and gender: JK Rowling's essay
In her text, the writer explains in detail the reasons why she felt the need to address the trans issue, defying the violence of activists. A manifesto-writer for gender critical feminism translated into Italian by Alessandra Asteriti
Attacking JK Rowling can now also be a business. The latest initiative is that of a young Canadian imbecile art book creator who has decided to de-rowling Harry Potter by publishing a special edition of the saga on the cover of which the author's name disappears: $170 per copy for a despicable abuse of power. Let him keep all the copies in stock. Back to the serious stuff: in June 2020 JK Rowling published an essay on her website detailing her position [...].
Read now
21 January 2023
The debate on puberty blockers also opens in Italy - finally!
Breaking the silence is the Italian Psychoanalytic Society, which is calling for an open scientific debate on these treatments, which it defines as 'experimental', not supported by adequate studies and at great ethical risk because they predetermine the fate of girls and boys
Much later than in the Great North of Europe, Great Britain, Australia, and some US states - which have abruptly put the brakes on the use of puberty blockers as a 'therapy' for girls and boys with gender non-conforming behaviour - Italy too is finally breaking its silence with a letter addressed to the government by the Italian Psychoanalytic Society, which calls for caution and the opening of a public scientific discussion. Below we reproduce interviews conducted by Marina Terragni for Il Foglio and [...].
Read now
16 January 2023
Italian psychoanalysts: stop puberty blockers
The Italian Psychoanalytic Society criticises puberty blockers for children: dangerous and experimental treatment. And joins gender critical feminists and parents in calling for scientific data and a public debate on the best treatment for children suffering from gender dysphoria
For years we gender critical feminists have been fighting against the scandal of the medicalisation of children in the name of gender identity. And for years we have been branded as fascists, reactionaries, bigots. Today at last an accredited Italian scientific society, the Italian Psychoanalytic Society (SPI), is taking a stand, joining us in raising a cry of alarm: the use of puberty blockers is an experimental treatment that has no solid scientific basis, and causes serious side effects. Above all, in most cases dysphoria [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 26