Feminism and Zan law

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

In these hours, the LGBT+ world is mobilising to ask the Senate Justice Commission to schedule the Zan bill against homobitransphobia, misogyny and ableism, which has already been approved by the Chamber of Deputies. Arcilesbica has drafted some proposals for amendments without which, he says, 'there is a risk of serious damage'. These, in brief, are the proposals addressed to the centre-left's senator-ministers.

- in the definitions in Article 1, using the clear terms of 'sex, gender stereotypes, sexual orientation, transsexuality', instead of the current ambiguities (sex, gender, sexual orientation and gender identity)

- make it explicit that the bill is consistent with the existing ban on womb renting. Being against gpa is not homophobia

- make it explicit that the bill is consistent with the current law 164/82 (which regulates the rectification of 'sex change', ed) and with the subsequent Constitutional Court judgment 180/2017 which states that for sex change "the voluntarist element alone cannot have priority or exclusive importance". Being against gender self-certification (self-id) is not transphobia.

Arcilesbica's position is relevant mainly because it comes from within the LGBT+ world concerned by the law.

But apparently all women, of whatever sexual orientation, and people with disabilities are equally affected by the law, and this is due to the specific will of the signatories who have provided themselves with these facilitating" fig leavesWho would dare to vote against a law that also defends women, all of them, and the disabled? Inclusion' follows the traditional phallogocentric formulas that have always been used in Italian politics, in which, after 'naturally' referring to the male subject, 'young people, the elderly, women, the disabled' and any other subject deemed 'marginal' were also added.

As we have always said, therefore, We consider it important to remove the fight against misogyny (represented by the word 'sex') from the text of the bill. Women are not one of several minorities to be protected, they are the majority of mankind.

For some time now, feminism, particularly Anglo-Saxon feminism, has been undergoing a complex debate on the appropriateness of laws against misogyny as a hate crime (see here), an opportunity on which positions are still differentiated. The time and manner of this discussion between women must be respected and cannot be 'paternalistically' bypassed by men for opportunistic reasons. Ad abundantiam: very often there have been real conflicts between legislation protecting LGBT+ and women's reasons/interestsas he explains very well here Julie Bindel. So: Misogyny out of the Zan bill.

There is at least one other significant theme, which concerns the "Lgbtq+ 'training' in schools. During the debate that led to the approval of the bill in the Chamber, the majority rejected even very reasonable amendments making participation in these 'courses' conditional on parental consent, at least for primary and secondary school pupils.. Participation would therefore be compulsory, in absolute contrast to the Anglo-Saxon world where, after years of these practices and having seen the damage, governments are putting the brakes on: In the UK, for example, LGBT+ associations such as Mermaids are no longer allowed to 'train' in schools of all levels. Vice versa in Italian schools these occasions are multiplying, in particular the propaganda initiatives for 'free gender identity' and the 'surrogate mother', while any educational proposal by women that does not focus on LGBT+ rights has no place in schools and universities (this is the so-called no-platforming, see here e here).

Finally, the question of the guarantees for the free expression of thoughtwith particular reference to the thought of radical and gender-critical feminism, if it is true that, as explained by the first signatory of the lagge Mr Zan himself "the law is to instil an attitude of caution in people. "Prudence', which is already being 'instilled' everywhere - in newspapers, in academies, on social networks - with bans and lawsuits. (see here).

In our opinion, therefore, The excellent proposal drawn up by Arcilesbica should be supplemented (and amended where it does not discuss the fact that the law also covers women).

As you can see in this tweet from WHRC Norway, just 3 months after the approval of a law that includes gender identity as a possible object of hate crimes, MP Jenny Klinge was denounced for saying that 'only women give birth'..

This is what awaits us.

Il femminismo e la legge Zan

It is also hoped that, should the bill be calendared, the reasons long expressed by feminism (you can find them in this petition) are finally being heard: so far this has not happened, contrary to what the former leader of the PD group in the Chamber stated in his final explanation of vote. More precisely, that there is finally the possibility of be heard in the Commission for Justice.

Marina Terragni

Most of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read about them elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding. If you think our work can be useful for your life, we would be grateful for even the smallest contribution.  



IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
10 November 2023
British academics against cancel culture
On 20 November, the London Universities Council for Academic Freedom will be unveiled, a body that brings together a hundred or so professors from the major British universities with the intention of fighting against the censorship and single-mindedness that in recent years have impeded academic debate and freedom, compromising the education of thousands of students. In the crosshairs especially Lgbtq+ realities such as Stonewall that have heavily influenced university and higher education. About time, and go on!
As reported by The Telegraph, more than a hundred academics from the UK's top universities have joined forces to tackle the growing threat of cancel culture through the creation of a new body dedicated to academic freedom. In a pioneering initiative, the scholars have formed the 'London Universities Council for Academic Freedom', involving all academic institutions in the capital including University College London (UCL), King's College London, [...]
Read now
8 November 2023
Canada: gender critical nurse risks her job
Amy Hamm works in a psychiatric ward and is under investigation for promoting women's rights based on sex and child protection online. The BCCNM, the body that regulates the nursing profession, intends to suspend her unless she participates in a re-education programme but Amy opposes this: the hearing is underway. US journalist Megyn Kelly interviewed her
Canadian nurse Amy Hamm - one of the founders of the non-profit coalition Canadian Women Sex Based Rights (caWsbar) - works in an acute psychiatric ward specialising in mental health and substance use. Amy risks losing her nursing licence and her job because she allegedly promoted women's sex-based rights and child protection online. In recent years, Amy has been the subject of an investigation by the British Columbia College of Nurses & Midwives [...]
Read now
6 November 2023
No more drugs for children with gender dysphoria!
For many years a pioneer of puberty blocker and hormone-based treatments for 'gender non-conforming' minors, Finnish psychiatrist Riittakerttu Kaltiala now denounces these 'therapies' as dangerous, useless and lacking in scientific evidence. And she calls on doctors around the world to find the courage to break the silence imposed by activist censorship and the media's rubber wall
In Italy there persists an obstinate silence on pharmacological treatments for minors with gender dysphoria (puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, 'gender reassignment' surgery) according to the protocol of so-called gender affirmative therapy. It is not possible to know how many minors have been treated or are undergoing treatment, in how many and which centres they are treated and with what 'success' (or failure) rates. While throughout the Western world the debate has been open for some time and in some countries [...]
Read now
24 October 2023
At the urgent request of PPOO Minister Eugenia Roccella, the deadline set for the UDI to adapt its statute to allow men to join as well slips by 180 days. In the meantime, the powerful Schlienian Igor Taruffi, transfeminist councillor for Welfare and head of organisation of the national PD, will have to explain which passage of the circular on the reform of the Third Sector justifies his attack on female separatism
At the insistent request of PPOO Minister Eugenia Roccella, the Emilia Romagna region has granted an extension of 180 days to the UDI associations of Modena, Ferrara and Ravenna to adapt their statutes to allow men to register (we have told you about this here), statutes that UDI Bologna has in fact already modified for some time (2020) The deadline for modifying its statutes, under penalty of being expelled from the register of Third Sector Associations (RUNTS), has therefore been extended from [...].
Read now
11 October 2023
Only women? Can no longer be
In 10 days' time -on 21 October- the UDI Emilia Romagna could be deleted from the Third Sector register unless it agrees to register men as well. This is how the left attacks women's political spaces - starting with the historical association linked to the Resistance - in the name of the trans-feminist 'inclusiveness' promoted by the PD. A huge risk for all feminism. They cannot win
Women's spaces under attack. Not only the physical ones - changing rooms, sports, shelter homes, hospital wards, prisons - but also the symbolic and political ones. If you don't admit men, close down and disappear. Incredible and exemplary is what is happening to UDI, Unione Donne in Italia, an association that has been active for almost 80 years historically linked to the left. Many of the UDIs in Emilia-Romagna are at risk of imminent cancellation from RUNTS, the single national register of the Third Sector, simply for the fact [...]
Read now
4 October 2023
UK: out of women's hospital wards men who 'identify' as women
The woke initiative of the British Medical Association, which ordered its members to stop using the terms 'woman' and 'mother', is being answered by the Sunak government, which is reinstating the biological sex criterion and abandoning the gender identity criterion in the health service. Why we need to return to common sense
The battle rages in the UK over the physical and symbolic spaces reserved for women. The British General Medical Council, which in its guidelines ordered the deletion of the words 'woman' and 'mother', is shortly to be answered by the Sunak government's initiative to reinstate the biological sex criterion and abandon gender identity in the health service: MtF transsexuals -that is, biologically male- will no longer be housed in women's hospital wards even if they identify as women. This week [...]
Read now
1 2 3 55