Women's G20: open letter to Minister Bonetti

The ideological paritarianism of the 1970s is at an end. Women and the world need female difference. And the revalorisation of the maternal bond as the root of a new human civilisation.
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

The first G20 Conference dedicated to women is being held today in Santa Margherita Ligure: this open letter calls for a political change. Let's focus on the female difference, without limiting ourselves to talk about equality: women are asking for a long-awaited change.

It is possible to think of Women's G20 as an innovative and original moment of reflection for our lives as women?

The events in Afghanistan in recent hours remind us that Decades of resources and work can be destroyed in an instant.male power can quickly return to its origins and drive women's bodies back to the terrain of contention and restoration. 

If it is true that the paths of female authority must offer opportunities for educational and infrastructural growth, as indicated in the statements of the Minister Bonetti (STEM education: on the alleged lack of access to STEM see here; tax relief for women's employment, day-care centres) we feel that the proposal for concrete action on the phenomena of neo-patriarchal restoration is lackingsymbolic and material.

Four women killed in the last few hours alone signify a lotta to violence that still does not take off in the instruments of contrast and in the social representations we attribute to it.

The determination with which, even in progressive circles, the already precarious spaces of women's freedom are being eroded is evident and the the value of female difference, female genealogy and the maternal bond with daughters and sons is strongly questioned. 

We cannot ignore the mothers' struggle for torn children, attempts to annul the female difference, to legalise the organised prostitutionto introduce theuterus for rentto propose as a solution to the children the hormone blockers, to obtain free care work by women: these will be our burqa, the rifle to the temple of female freedom. 

In the face of these battles there is a good chance that we will lose if we women continue to chase public spaces that are exclusively male. 

Women from many Italian cities, associations, women in politics and feminism joined the garrisons at the Prefectures in June-July with the "Mothers in revoltThey ask for a closer look at the discussed 'right' to the bigenitoriality, the perverse effects of law 54/2006 and secondary victimisation of mothers who denounce violence and ask for spaces of freedom by protecting their daughter(s). With difficulty emerges the inhumanity of child removal orders to foster homes or abusive fathers, of court costs charged to indigent mothers, and of CTUs (court-appointed technical consultancies) for child custody that become compulsory medical treatment for mothers because of non-existent syndromes - such as parental alienation. Whereas, by contrast, abusive fathers are justified, protected, encouraged.

Violence against mothers and children represents only the tip of the iceberg of a desire to re-subjugate women and reaffirmation of fathers' 'rights'. These areas can no longer be kept separate from political action because they can be historicized with the crisis of equality policies that do not take into account the differences between the sexes.

Bigenitoriality and shared custody were intended to satisfy a ideological parityIt was driven by the expectation that sharing the burden of care was the way to female freedom and male responsibility, and this is what many women still think today. But separated fathers are organised in lobbies decided to abolish the 'privilege' of paternal financial contribution to maintenance, and question the primacy of the maternal bond in the upbringing of children, sanctioned and protected by family law until 1975.

The paradoxical effect has been to divide the children into two, rather than the responsibilities, and even protect the parenting skills of abusers. This has been made possible by the crucial shift from difference to sexual indifference. Neutral disfavours those who are oppressed precisely on the basis of their gender: women. Removed, politically and symbolically, sexual difference cannot produce liberation. The deconstruction of the symbolic value of difference calls politics for a radical and far-sighted reversal.

Women must be assured a public space restored to female freedom to be able to devote themselves, if they wish, to bringing up children with adequate economic support or contractual protection. This means not only crèches, which are now proposed even in the exo-gestation phase.

The whole world of fragility needs to be secured with adequate support modelled on difference. Care, as a paradigm of renewed political visions, risks yet another rhetorical devaluation. if not declined as a concrete strategy. The maternal bonding is also the key to growing and living in an awareness of fragility and interdependence.

So much violence is hurled at mothers because they are the root of human relationships. We have written elsewhere that "the equalitarian dream of the 1970s flattered his daughters by promising them freedom against their mothers, against what they stood for".. Are we ready, today, to recognise the naivety of that thought? If mothers are not free in their difference, they will not be able to raise free daughters. In our social and economic precariousness, we will not be able to welcome other women, nor will we be able to delude them about the advantages of living in the West.

This short circuit has generated the damage of today and we can no longer see such a deadly and destructive presence in action. We call on Minister Bonetti to initiate a debate possible, without opposing models or interpretations: women know how to do this if they want to.

Maria Esposito Siotto- Collettivo Donne In-Curanti (with the contribution of the editorial staff of Feminist Post)

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
4 October 2023
UK: out of women's hospital wards men who 'identify' as women
The woke initiative of the British Medical Association, which ordered its members to stop using the terms 'woman' and 'mother', is being answered by the Sunak government, which is reinstating the biological sex criterion and abandoning the gender identity criterion in the health service. Why we need to return to common sense
The battle rages in the UK over the physical and symbolic spaces reserved for women. The British General Medical Council, which in its guidelines ordered the deletion of the words 'woman' and 'mother', is shortly to be answered by the Sunak government's initiative to reinstate the biological sex criterion and abandon gender identity in the health service: MtF transsexuals -that is, biologically male- will no longer be housed in women's hospital wards even if they identify as women. This week [...]
Read now
28 September 2023
Buying and selling human embryos and foetuses: first EU yes
A draft European Parliament (SoHo) regulation approved by a majority of Liberals, Socialists and Greens definitively opens up the cross-border market for 'substances of human origin' including gametes, embryos and foetuses. With the risk that national legislations may be bypassed by virtue of Brussels' instructions
The European Parliament approved in the first instance a proposal for a regulation that equates human embryos with cells and tissues, calling them 'substances of human origin', and opens the door to eugenics and industrial uses. The proposed regulation on quality and safety standards for substances of human origin intended for human application (or SoHO regulation) was approved on 12 September by a large majority of socialists, greens and liberals, despite the alarm raised by various expert organisations. Officially the [...]
Read now
21 September 2023
Open letter to Health Minister Schillaci: medically assisted procreation does not increase the birth rate. On the contrary, it is among the causes of the demographic winter
Free homologous fertilisation and a €1,500 ticket for heterologous fertilisation: the minister announces new measures that would help stem the birth crisis. But it is the exact opposite: the more we feed the illusion of being able to postpone the birth of a child ad libitum - the results of PMA are poor: in more than 8 out of 10 cases it fails - the fewer children will be born. There is only one way: infertility prevention. Starting with correct information against the propaganda of the reproductive biomarket
Dear Minister Schillaci, we learn from press reports that as of 1 January next year the National Health Service will provide homologous fertilisation services free of charge and that it has established a co-payment for heterologous fertilisation - the responsibility of the region - which is expected to be around 1,500 euro. The provision would be part, according to him, of the measures against the birth rate in our country: less than 400 thousand births in 2022, the lowest number since the unification of Italy to date. In reality, as he explains [...]
Read now
18 September 2023
The new PD proposal on surrogate children is wrong: here's why
The idea is a facilitated 'rewarding' path -only four months- for the adoption of children born by gestation for others: a quasi-automatism that instead of counteracting it would encourage recourse to the practice. Moreover, a difference is made between this type of adoptee -GPA clients- and all others for whom the timing would not change. But the Constitution wants us equal before the law
The PD has deposited in the Senate -first signatory the cathodem Alfredo Bazoli, deputy vice-president of the PD group- a bill that provides for a 'special adoption' so-called 'affective' for the children of hetero or homo couples born from uterus for rent. Basically, it accepts the procedure of adoption in special cases of those born by Gpa for the 'intentional' parent, but calls for it to be accelerated to arrive at a ruling within four months. The court, therefore, the text reads, "shall verify whether the [...]
Read now
9 August 2023
Male bodies in women's sports: finally something is moving
It's about time: FIDAL, the Italian Athletics Federation, complies with the directives of World Athletics to ensure fairness in women's sports competitions by dictating strict conditions for the participation of trans women athletes. Meanwhile, Martina Navratilova makes it clear that 'women's tennis is not for failed males' by rebelling against an injustice that, she says, 'is patriarchy'.
While tennis player Martina Navratilova is being heaped with contumely for stating the obvious, namely that she is fed up with seeing male bodies thriving in women's tennis (the latest case being that of US transwoman Alicia Rowley, you can see her in the centre of the opening photo) adding that 'women's tennis is not for failed males' and that 'it is patriarchy for biological men to insist on the right to compete in the women's category in sport' (La Repubblica speaks with dismay and [...]
Read now
4 August 2023
Lesbian motherhood: open letter to Kathleen Stock
The gender critical philosopher says she is concerned about the rights of lesbian mothers being denied 'by the Meloni government'. But it was the judiciary and not the government that decided that only biological mothers can appear on birth certificates. In order for the law to recognise sexual difference in procreation, it is necessary for homosexual women to break the front with wealthy gay males who resort to surrogacy: homogeny is just ideology
We have been following closely and sisterly the story of Kathleen Stock, gender critical philosopher, author among others of Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism (Little, Brown Book Group, 2021) and former lecturer at the University of Sussex persecuted by transactivists: we have told her story here. Together with Martina Navratilova and Julie Bindel Stock she recently founded The Lesbian Project with the aim of reaffirming the specificity of lesbian identity. The aim of the project is 'to stop the disappearance of lesbians in the rainbow soup and to give [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 34