22 October 2021

3 months paternity leave: but mothers and fathers are not equal

The "Family Act" measure announced by Equal Opportunities Minister Bonetti at the Women's Forum G20 Italy. But if greater male participation is desirable, the equalitarian logic that inspires sharing moves once again in the direction of the neutral, denying female difference and promoting ineffective actions
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

During the opening in Milan of the "Women's Forum G20 Italy". the Minister for Equal Opportunities Elena Bonetti announced the plans to gradually extend compulsory paternity leave from the current 10 days to 3 months, as part of the 'Family Act'. 

The extension - and in some cases the equalisation - of leave for fathers and mothers is presented as a progressive policy aimed at achieving greater 'gender equality'. in the family and at work, as well as encouraging a sharing of the burdens of care that today weigh disproportionately on women and often without formal or material recognition.

Referring to the lengthening of the period of compulsory leave for fathers after the birth of a daughter, Bonetti states theobjective of 'equalising male and female responsibility'. At a time in history when the concept of "rights'. is extended to include the most varied individual wishes, the emphasis on the concept of responsibility. In the area of parenting, too, there is a discourse on rights that mainly represents the wishes of adults and rarely focuses on children. For example, the use of surrogacy and medically-assisted fertilisation is claimed as a 'right' that the state should guarantee, overlooking the reasons for the business and the implications in terms of morality and physical and psychological health for women and children.

Returning to the measure under discussion, the current government's guidelines and the PNRR often mention the need to increase female employment to achieve 'gender equality'. In the 1970s, feminism criticised the concept of 'emancipation' and 'equality', which ended up proposing homologation to the male model, denying the free expression of female difference. A lesson that seems to have been forgotten today, even though it would offer useful insights into why many 'well-intentioned' equalitarian policies are not producing the desired change, but merely encourage women to 'be like men'adhering to a model that is still firmly masculine and patriarchal.

The increase of compulsory leave time for fathers would, according to supporters, serve to reduce the costs for companies of hiring a woman (new mother and/or potential new mother) compared to those of a man (new father and/or potential new father). The effectiveness of this measure should be assessed ex-post: caring and family burdens do not end after the first three months of a child's life and do not only concern women who have children. There should be a debate to consider why voluntary leave is not used by fathers today, and therefore whether making this measure compulsory would contribute to 'educational' purposes or instead to changing the balance of power that generates most of the injustices suffered by women everywhere.

If it is true that 'it takes a village to raise a child', this measure could perhaps also go some way towards reducing the physical and moral loneliness experienced by women who become mothers in the West. In any case, To put the father and mother on an equal footing, even if only verbally, in the first months of life is still an objective that is the result of a cultural approach that is neutral and needs to be discussed and tested.

Instead, generating change requires full recognition of the difference betweenIt should be explored in order to reform the model in practice, taking into account the free expression of female difference, difference that grounds the human and demands to be able to shape the world, domestic and public.

If they do not recognise difference, equality policies risk becoming "policies of indifference", unfair and inscribed in the symbolic male order alone. 

Veronica Tamborini


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
22 January 2024
Men IntintA and other wonders
The health of 'Marco', a trans FtM who is five months pregnant with testosterone, and that of her baby are the least of the problems. What matters to the liberal press talking about an 'anthropological revolution' is whether 'Marco' is to be called mother or father. But only a woman can give birth even if at the registry office her name is male. In this nothing has changed since the dawn of time. In the meantime, the trans front is losing ground: in one year, the number of members of WPATH, the largest transgender health organisation, has fallen by 60 per cent.
La Repubblica online headlines with a triple somersault about the 'young man who got pregnant': pregnant is not dared even at the transphilic GEDI group. The story is that of 'Marco', a girl undergoing testosterone therapy to look more like a man: beard, graver voice -not to 'become male' because sex cannot be changed and every single cell will remain damned XX-. 'Marco' had retained his uterus and ovaries and following a hetero sexual relationship (a [...]
Read now
19 December 2023
When abortion is violence
A large number of abortions can be explained by the irresponsibility and 'running away' of men. "For whose pleasure am I aborting?" wondered Carla Lonzi. But this male violence is never mentioned and women continue to be blamed. As the ProVita do with their proposal to force them to listen to the fetus' heartbeat
Admittedly, I told ProVita's Maria Rachele Ruiu in all frankness that forcing a woman intending to have an abortion to listen to the fetus' heartbeat is not an admissible proposal. It is a senseless, sadistic, punitive and probably unconstitutional idea that would probably only have the effect of encouraging clandestine abortion. Perhaps the proposal will never go on the table and will remain mere propaganda. Bad propaganda though. Once again in the crosshairs there [...]
Read now
15 December 2023
Trials and rapes
The questions asked in the courtroom to the alleged victim of sexual violence by Ciro Grillo and his companions are very reminiscent of the tone of the defence lawyers in the famous 1979 'Rape Trial'. The formidable harangue of Tina Lagostena Bassi, plaintiff's lawyer in that case, explains why these interrogation methods were - and remain - unacceptable. Let's listen to it again
It is worth re-reading and possibly re-listening to -the award-winning film Rape Trial, 1979*, you can see it again here in its entirety- the formidable harangue of lawyer Tina Lagostena Bassi, plaintiff's counsel in defence of a young woman raped by four men who had lured her to a villa in Nettuno under the pretext of a job offer. The trial ended with a conviction but the defendants received conditional release. It is worth listening to that harangue again because in the words [...]
Read now
4 December 2023
Misogynists out of public service
Teo Mammucari's engagement on 'Dancing with the Stars', starring in one of the most offensive shows ever against women, with a 'mute assistant' -Flavia Vento- boxed in plexiglas and methodically mocked, casts doubt on RAI's effective commitment against violence and machismo. And it obliges citizens to contribute to the cachet of those who have offered such a degrading image of women
To the RAI Board of Directors to the President MARINELLA SOLDI to the CEO ROBERTO SERGIO to the RAI Parliamentary Supervisory Commission The feminicide of Giulia Cecchettin marked a point of no return in the collective conscience on male violence: the only possible precedent is the Circeo crime. RAI represented this moment of pain and political awareness by manifesting its intention to mobilise permanently against misogyny and machismo. For this reason we are surprised, offended and saddened by the engagement to [...].
Read now
30 November 2023
Born of a surrogate mother
Olivia Maurel, 32, was born to a surrogate mother and today she is fighting on the front line against the practice, which she describes as 'atrocious' and 'monstrous'. She always knew something was wrong with her family. She suffers from depression, has had problems with alcoholism and has attempted suicide several times. Only recently has she discovered the truth about her origins and that she suffered the trauma of abandonment. "To no child," she says, "should what happened to me ever happen again."
Commercial or 'altruistic' surrogacy must be abolished. These are the words of Olivia Maurel, born in December 1991 in Kentucky by traditional surrogacy (i.e. in which the oocyte also belongs to the 'surrogate mother', ed.), who recounted her experience in a conference at the parliament of the Czech Republic. Today, married with two children in Cannes, 'proud to be a feminist' as we read on her X page, she fights against surrogacy. Her testimony, very valuable as there are still very few [...]
Read now
9 November 2023
13 November in The Hague against surrogacy
The Private International Law Conference is pushing for transnational recognition of gestation per se contracts with the intention of forcing national legislation to benefit biomarket profits. The Icams coalition against GPA organised a demonstration in defence of women's dignity and against the market in girls and children
The International Coalition to Abolish Surrogacy (ICASM) organised an international demonstration in front of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) on 13 November to oppose the regulation of cross-border 'surrogacy'. Indeed, attempts are being made to impose international regulation of so-called 'surrogacy': as of 13 November, the HCCH will set up a working group with the task of drafting a convention to allow cross-border recognition of contracts. This is to meet the growing demand in the biomarket [...]
Read now
1 2 3 25