We women, the 'Privileged

Transactivism defines being born a woman as a 'privilege' that must also be open to those who have not had this unspeakable good fortune. It's the old envious story, or patriarchy. But talking about privilege is a step forward in clarity. If the world needs women more and more, then the real women will be 'them'.
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

There is something good here.

In recent years we have been resisting theinvasion of being a woman by men. In reality she is just the latest figure in the old envious story of all time, o patriarchy.

Men have always wanted to appropriating the woman-being and her creative power, exploiting women's bodies in every way and occupying the centre of the world. The good thing is that Today, language reveals this movement in all its clarity.. Today a significant number of men demands access to being a woman.a. Being born in a woman's body is explicitly declared as "privilege"This is a nice leap in clarity. It is a taboo breaking.

They always tried to convince us that being born in a woman's body was a disgrace.and that we would pay dearly for it. That because of our female sexual bodies our lives would be less free and subject to domination. Too many, fortunately not all, still allow themselves to be convinced by this reading.

But Today, transactivism speaks clearly about the 'privilege' of being born in a female body. To be precise, it says that if you are born in a woman's body, you enjoy a 'privilege' that non-women - men - can only try to conquer with a hard struggle, taking hormones, undergoing surgical manipulations that will never achieve the goal.

It's all so clear at last!

Judith Butler insists that the women's 'category' must be open and inclusive for subjectivities that are not exclusively women born women. There does not seem to be the same urgency with regard to the 'category' of men.

How do you explain this growing human desire to be part of the female 'category'.or to be able to join if one does not enjoy this 'privilege' from birth? 

Men - all men - are aware of the greatness of women.. They know that they have usurped their place at the centre of the world, and that that place was not theirs to take. And they know that it has come to the ropes.

Every man knows this, and in his private life he always looks for a woman to rely on, trusts in a woman's ability to govern things, while in the public sphere he does not want to give up single-sex exclusivity. It is men above all - even more than women, who are induced to forget it - who are the holders of the secret of female greatness, aware of the injustice of exclusion.

Men do not forget the power of the woman who gave birth to them and not being women they in turn seek for their lives a woman they can tame and control, to whom they entrust themselves as children without feeling threatened. Most of all they remember the truth of the world that claimed women to be the centre of the human beingand the violation by them of this natural arrangement of things.

But now this claim of the world is reaffirmed by the threat of human extinctionenvironmental and climate crisis and pandemic - whatever its origin - tell us that male prometheism is at an end -alternatively, at the end of the race it is us-. E indicate a female-rooted civilisation as the way to save the species.

A significant number of men are pressing to be part of this necessary souveraineté female, claims to be included in the ranks of the 'privileged'. The main means of inclusion, violently affirmed, are artificial reproduction of the human being -all techniques-, uterine transplantation, male pregnancy and breastfeeding, cancellation and replacement of the mother by a surrogate, pharmacological and surgical "therapies" of the body, genetic manipulation, fetishisation of the female body and its functions.

These are some of the means by which the so-called transhuman transition. But transhumanism is "homeopathically" configured as a a super-prometism that should repair the damage done by prometheism.

Transhumanism constitutes an extreme attempt to resist historical patriarchy. Admits the need for an unpostponable souveraineté female, but demand that men remain sovereign even in this souveraineté, again replacing women as women truer simple "natives". First ladies, in short.

The answer to this historical passage can only be a female-rooted civilisation, somewhat a-historical civilisation because, if a nature exists, this was the way nature had arranged things for the human species. A disposition that we can still observe in the very rare matrilineal enclaves where men find their peaceful place in the world.

Some might object that if it is the 'category' of women that is asked to open up in order to be maximally inclusive, if it is 'native' women that are asked to give up the exclusive use of the name 'woman' in order to be content to be defined as 'bodies with vaginas' (The Lancet), in reality we observe a huge increase in FtM transitions (now 8 out of 10 cases) very rare until about 20 years ago or even less. Girls who renounce the 'privilege' of being born women in order to identify themselves as men.. However, this phenomenon cannot be included in the transhuman perspective.

The vast majority of FtM transitions are merely the most radical and extreme manifestation of the 'old' emancipation. (see here). These young women are still subject to the patriarchal deception of interpreting being born in a female body as a misfortune to be remedied in some way. Which have not yet encountered the awareness of the 'unspeakable good fortune of being born a woman'. (Luisa Muraro). Fortune, which today is called "privilege". The phenomenon of the FtM girls makes imitative use of part of the symbolic transhuman paraphernalia, but does not participate in it except by using its language, an equal flattening that conceals the reality of sexual difference.

Marina Terragni

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
25 February 2024
The 'milk' of men
The English National Health Service ensures that the milk produced by a male body -stimulated with ad hoc drug therapy- is as good for the newborn as that of its mother, who is wiped out. Minimising the risks to the child's health largely offset by the ideological and symbolic benefits. It is the transhuman, my beauties!
Men's 'milk' is a perfect example of what we call transhuman. Women's milk, on the other hand, is human, all too human, it is the perfect model of the enduring human, and therefore natural breastfeeding should be degraded, mocked, stigmatised as something to be ashamed of and kept hidden. In fact, it is even a useless and unethical act. On the contrary, promoting and magnifying male 'breastfeeding' shows plastically the way forward. According to the prestigious journal Pediatrics, organ of the American Academy of Pediatrics, it is 'risky' to define [...]
Read now
15 February 2024
How to convince progressives to give up gender
Terrified of transactivists and worried about sounding 'right-wing', left-wingers support the transition of minors even in the absence of studies showing that 'affirmative therapy' works and promotes the well-being of gender non-conforming girls and boys. "But everyone has a right to evidence-based medicine," argue some liberals determined to "break the spell". And they start DIAG -Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender- to convince democrats in the US and around the world that continuing on this path is wrong and dangerous. For children and for the left. An article by Bernard Lane
A new movement of US Democrats wants to find out how to break the spell of gender ideology and bring the party back to the liberal values of science and reason. Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender (DIAG) launched a project yesterday on X Space (Twitter) to commission research on how to more effectively reach out to left-wing voters who believe that science is now in favour of 'gender-affirming' medicalisation of gender non-conforming youth. "The only way to end this [...]
Read now
6 February 2024
New York Times: Strong doubts about hormones for children with gender dysphoria
The world's leading woke newspaper has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, starting with the indecent treatment of JK Rowling. Today the paper changes course and in a very long article criticises the 'affirmative therapy' (puberty blockers, hormones and surgery) for trans minors, giving a voice to some hitherto censored and ostracised detransitioners. Because by now even many Democratic voters have strong doubts. And there is a risk of losing many readers: "get woke, go broke".
For years, the New York Times has been the world's leading woke newspaper and has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, jubilating critical voices. The treatment of JK Rowling is exemplary. In 2022 a very violent subscription campaign invited people to imagine Harry Potter without its creator: the ultimate in cancel culture (see here) A misogynistic and aggressive gesture - the initiative turned out to be a boomerang and many female subscribers threatened to cancel -. A few months ago The Daily published [...].
Read now
22 January 2024
Men IntintA and other wonders
The health of 'Marco', a trans FtM who is five months pregnant with testosterone, and that of her baby are the least of the problems. What matters to the liberal press talking about an 'anthropological revolution' is whether 'Marco' is to be called mother or father. But only a woman can give birth even if at the registry office her name is male. In this nothing has changed since the dawn of time. In the meantime, the trans front is losing ground: in one year, the number of members of WPATH, the largest transgender health organisation, has fallen by 60 per cent.
La Repubblica online headlines with a triple somersault about the 'young man who got pregnant': pregnant is not dared even at the transphilic GEDI group. The story is that of 'Marco', a girl undergoing testosterone therapy to look more like a man: beard, graver voice -not to 'become male' because sex cannot be changed and every single cell will remain damned XX-. 'Marco' had retained his uterus and ovaries and following a hetero sexual relationship (a [...]
Read now
7 January 2024
New Hampshire: No more 'sex change' surgery on minors
The US state has passed a bill banning surgeons from performing operations on under-18 year olds such as the removal of ovaries and breasts for females and penises and testicles for males. The bill states that these operations violate the patient's 'informed consent' and points out that studies have not shown a decrease in the suicide risk of minors after the operations. On the contrary: the danger increases
New Hampshire is preparing to ban under-18s from undergoing sex-change operations. Last Thursday, the New Hampshire House of Representatives passed a bill to this effect, also with the help of some Democratic members. House Bill 619 prohibits doctors from performing 'any genital gender reassignment surgery', i.e. the removal of the uterus, ovaries and breasts in the case of women; testicles and penis for men, to anyone in the [...]
Read now
31 December 2023
Puberty should perhaps be stopped at ALL: Transhuman drift of the World Health Organisation
In a veritable Christmas blitz, the WHO announces that it wants to draw up new gender-affirming guidelines and sets up a panel made up of three-quarters transactivists in favour of medicalising children. Preferably all of them, even those who do not suffer from dysphoria. Because choosing what sex you are must become a universal right. An international petition calls for a halt to the initiative
A few days before Christmas, the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced that it will develop new guidelines on the 'health of trans and gender diverse people', with a focus on access to hormones and surgery (what it calls 'gender-inclusive care.) ') and legal recognition of gender self-identification (self id). The WHO also announced that it has formed a group to develop the guidelines. This expert group includes many World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) apparatchiks, including [...]
Read now
1 2 3 51