Mountains of money for the Trans Lobby

Here are accounts of the hundreds of thousands of dollars given by the Arcus charity to LGBTQ movements to support gender identity. Recommended reading especially for those who believe this is a left-wing battle
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

La The Arcus Foundation is a major charity supporting the LGBT justice issues and environmental conservation. Arcus is strongly involved in actively supporting transgender ideology. In these articles by Jennifer Bilek learn more: see here e here. If you want to check who the beneficiaries of ArcusThe list can be found at here. Ttween 2016 and April 2021, Arcus invested nearly $74 million in promoting social justice. Most of these beneficiaries had to do with gender identity ideology.

Montagne di soldi per la Lobby Trans

Many Arcus recipients have themselves provided grants: if a country is not a direct recipient of funds, it may have received money indirectly. In many cases, the tactic of the forced teaming -forcibly teaming up-. It happens for example when shosters of trans ideology feign alliance and common cause with more established movements in order to exploit their reputation. The most frequent case is the alliance with groups supporting gay rights. For example, Arcus donated 142,000 in Stonewall (formerly a gay rights charity in the UK). This happened just before Stonewall added the T a LGB and expand its mandate to cover transgender issues. Other 42,000 to support a project called 'Rainbow Laces' aimed at bringing LGBTQ people into sport.

Montagne di soldi per la Lobby Trans

Arcus also has paid Stonewall $75,000 to attend roundtables to convince business to support the LGBTQ cause by portraying it as a "a good business strategy'.

Montagne di soldi per la Lobby Trans

It might seem that Stonewall changed course in the direction of gender identity, because the battle for LGBT rights in the UK had been won. I disagree. The homophobia that harms young gay men has not disappeared. Maybe was no longer such an economically advantageous cause, but good work could still have been done in the UK. We could also have campaigned for gay and lesbian rights abroad. Work could have been done to stop the horrendous abuse of gays and lesbians in Iran, where they are not accepted as homosexuals but can get surgery if they accept the trans identity. Instead Stonewall opted for a more profitable route. It does not seem to have occurred to the bigwigs in the organisation that fighting to defend homosexual orientation involves recognising that sex is a material reality. Transgender ideology, on the other hand, denies the reality of sex and thus sex-based attraction. This is one of the many conflicts between trans and homosexual rights.

But back to the Arcus Foundation: looking at these projects in detail, it is rare to find one that focuses exclusively on sexual orientation. On the contrary, they appear considerable sums spent exclusively on 'transgender' issues, over 9 million dollars.

Montagne di soldi per la Lobby Trans

It is interesting to note that if you look for mention of specific projects for 'transmen' you will not find any. However, some of the projects specify a focus on 'Transwomen', usually Transwomen of colour. Transmen tend to be used when they are pregnant or when they make it easy to argue against the gender-based rights of biological women. The omission of any specific project aimed at the needs of the 'transmen' cries out: "good old sexism!". Another tactic has been to join women fighting for reproductive justice.. Women's struggle to control their fertility is being hijacked by trans organisations which hitch their wagon to these long-term campaigns.

Montagne di soldi per la Lobby Trans

Another surprise is the percentage that goes to religious organisations, including evangelical Christians and Muslim organisations. The next time someone tells you that you are allied with religious groups, here is a screenshot to share! More than 10.5 million dollars to religious organisations.

Montagne di soldi per la Lobby Trans

Organisations from which one would not expect liberal and progressive views on homosexuality or gender identity. Rather, many of these, in the United States, were eitherevangelical Christian organisations deeply involved in supporting Trump. A couple of examples appear below from Atlanta to Georgia and Texas

Montagne di soldi per la Lobby Trans
Montagne di soldi per la Lobby Trans

You will find other examples of "forced teaming" between grants focused on racial justice or homelessness. There are also many grants to organisations dealing with strategic litigation in the area of LGBTQ or exclusively 'transgender' organisations. Some projects are aimed at educating/lobbying -involving- United Nations employees.

Many of the entries also mention funding to create bottom-up movements. Someone should explain that grassroots movements grow spontaneously. When millions of dollars are invested to grow a movement, it is a 'free-for-all'.artificial grass, not in a grassroots movement.

The media narrative is the subject of skilful manipulation. These are the organisations involved in journalism or documentary film production that are receiving money from Arcus. The explicit aim is to ensure that media coverage is shaped by the Trans Lobby.

Montagne di soldi per la Lobby Trans

Here is an example of how these grants are described: To "ensure that the coverage is neutral or positive". And to organise to be ready in the respond to any negative media coverage. Journalism or advocacy?

Montagne di soldi per la Lobby Trans

As many of us are trying to point out to radical left-wing groups who shout 'transwomen are women'... or other meaningless mantras, and especially to the left-wing feminists: you are the subject of manipulation by billionaires. This is not a grassroots movement, is an elite project, A great deal of money is invested in promoting a dissociative body condition that disengages us from our sexed-up bodies.

the whole article by Gendercriticalwoman you can read it here

translation by Sara Punzo and Marina Terragni


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding. If you think our work can be useful for your life, we would be grateful for even the smallest contribution.  



IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
25 February 2024
The 'milk' of men
The English National Health Service ensures that the milk produced by a male body -stimulated with ad hoc drug therapy- is as good for the newborn as that of its mother, who is wiped out. Minimising the risks to the child's health largely offset by the ideological and symbolic benefits. It is the transhuman, my beauties!
Men's 'milk' is a perfect example of what we call transhuman. Women's milk, on the other hand, is human, all too human, it is the perfect model of the enduring human, and therefore natural breastfeeding should be degraded, mocked, stigmatised as something to be ashamed of and kept hidden. In fact, it is even a useless and unethical act. On the contrary, promoting and magnifying male 'breastfeeding' shows plastically the way forward. According to the prestigious journal Pediatrics, organ of the American Academy of Pediatrics, it is 'risky' to define [...]
Read now
15 February 2024
How to convince progressives to give up gender
Terrified of transactivists and worried about sounding 'right-wing', left-wingers support the transition of minors even in the absence of studies showing that 'affirmative therapy' works and promotes the well-being of gender non-conforming girls and boys. "But everyone has a right to evidence-based medicine," argue some liberals determined to "break the spell". And they start DIAG -Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender- to convince democrats in the US and around the world that continuing on this path is wrong and dangerous. For children and for the left. An article by Bernard Lane
A new movement of US Democrats wants to find out how to break the spell of gender ideology and bring the party back to the liberal values of science and reason. Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender (DIAG) launched a project yesterday on X Space (Twitter) to commission research on how to more effectively reach out to left-wing voters who believe that science is now in favour of 'gender-affirming' medicalisation of gender non-conforming youth. "The only way to end this [...]
Read now
6 February 2024
New York Times: Strong doubts about hormones for children with gender dysphoria
The world's leading woke newspaper has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, starting with the indecent treatment of JK Rowling. Today the paper changes course and in a very long article criticises the 'affirmative therapy' (puberty blockers, hormones and surgery) for trans minors, giving a voice to some hitherto censored and ostracised detransitioners. Because by now even many Democratic voters have strong doubts. And there is a risk of losing many readers: "get woke, go broke".
For years, the New York Times has been the world's leading woke newspaper and has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, jubilating critical voices. The treatment of JK Rowling is exemplary. In 2022 a very violent subscription campaign invited people to imagine Harry Potter without its creator: the ultimate in cancel culture (see here) A misogynistic and aggressive gesture - the initiative turned out to be a boomerang and many female subscribers threatened to cancel -. A few months ago The Daily published [...].
Read now
22 January 2024
Men IntintA and other wonders
The health of 'Marco', a trans FtM who is five months pregnant with testosterone, and that of her baby are the least of the problems. What matters to the liberal press talking about an 'anthropological revolution' is whether 'Marco' is to be called mother or father. But only a woman can give birth even if at the registry office her name is male. In this nothing has changed since the dawn of time. In the meantime, the trans front is losing ground: in one year, the number of members of WPATH, the largest transgender health organisation, has fallen by 60 per cent.
La Repubblica online headlines with a triple somersault about the 'young man who got pregnant': pregnant is not dared even at the transphilic GEDI group. The story is that of 'Marco', a girl undergoing testosterone therapy to look more like a man: beard, graver voice -not to 'become male' because sex cannot be changed and every single cell will remain damned XX-. 'Marco' had retained his uterus and ovaries and following a hetero sexual relationship (a [...]
Read now
7 January 2024
New Hampshire: No more 'sex change' surgery on minors
The US state has passed a bill banning surgeons from performing operations on under-18 year olds such as the removal of ovaries and breasts for females and penises and testicles for males. The bill states that these operations violate the patient's 'informed consent' and points out that studies have not shown a decrease in the suicide risk of minors after the operations. On the contrary: the danger increases
New Hampshire is preparing to ban under-18s from undergoing sex-change operations. Last Thursday, the New Hampshire House of Representatives passed a bill to this effect, also with the help of some Democratic members. House Bill 619 prohibits doctors from performing 'any genital gender reassignment surgery', i.e. the removal of the uterus, ovaries and breasts in the case of women; testicles and penis for men, to anyone in the [...]
Read now
31 December 2023
Puberty should perhaps be stopped at ALL: Transhuman drift of the World Health Organisation
In a veritable Christmas blitz, the WHO announces that it wants to draw up new gender-affirming guidelines and sets up a panel made up of three-quarters transactivists in favour of medicalising children. Preferably all of them, even those who do not suffer from dysphoria. Because choosing what sex you are must become a universal right. An international petition calls for a halt to the initiative
A few days before Christmas, the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced that it will develop new guidelines on the 'health of trans and gender diverse people', with a focus on access to hormones and surgery (what it calls 'gender-inclusive care.) ') and legal recognition of gender self-identification (self id). The WHO also announced that it has formed a group to develop the guidelines. This expert group includes many World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) apparatchiks, including [...]
Read now
1 2 3 52