Health is a feminist issue

There is a lack of will to save public healthcare. Instead, private investment is growing exponentially. Without a paradigm shift, without putting the relationship back at the centre of care and human coexistence, we will not see real change. This is the change in civilisation that we have been talking about for some time.
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

In the course of the fourth Covid wave, we reaffirmed - if there was any need - the disaster of territorial health care. publicsuper-conscientious but overburdened and unreachable -or on the run- general practitioners, no support, stressed or non-existent Usca, do-it-yourself tampons, the bricolage of self-care. And every other health problem neglected and postponed sine die. Almost every family has experienced the problem up close. A stress test that brought to light the accumulated problems of years and years of bad public health policy practices.

At the moment few signs of a trend reversal: we talk about "health houses and of community hospitals - in 'excellent' Lombardy, for example, we are still in the process of finding suitable land and buildings - but in the meantime private multi-specialist centres are springing up everywhere like mushrooms. who have apparently already found land and buildings, which is a good indication of the direction in which they are moving. A two-way street: obstacles, bottlenecks and delays for public intervention, rapidity of private initiative. Business is not wrong, it is betting on the fact that the health crisis will never be resolved and is consolidating investment in 'care' as a business between private professionals and private citizens.

A great heritage, that of our public health, the last traces of which are melting away like snow in the sun.

If it is true, as we have always said, that care is first and foremost a relationship of which drugs and diagnostic tools are mere instruments -relationship between the patient and the therapist, between the 'sick' organ and the rest of the body, between healthy and sick, between the patient and his or her contexts, between places of life and places of care -. its paradigm cannot be represented by the commercial agreement between a 'dysfunctional' individual and an invoicing professional.

There will be no more true public and territorial healthcare without a radical transformation of this paradigm.

Care and recognition of mutual dependence are the founding principles of any human community, whose primary purpose has always been to come together to ensure closeness, support, protection and help. But Today, the exchange value - money - has completely overridden these primary values.

In the world we are living in profit determines everything, without any countervailing principles. Perhaps money has never mattered so much in human history. A real "neo-feudalism'. (Shoshana Zuboff) which sees exponentially increase the number of poor people and, in unison, the dividends of the richest companies ever. In particular the hi-tech companies of Silicon Valley ex-hippies. During the pandemic Jeff Bezos of Amazon has earned a volume of capital gains equivalent to what would have to be spent to ensure 3 doses of vaccine for all the inhabitants of the Earth.

It cannot, therefore, simply be a matter of patching up local health care with some compassionate trompe-l'oeil for the 'poor'. Even when we talk about healthcare, It is a question of the change in civilisation that we have been discussing for some time, bringing back to the centre the two of the relationship, understood as an indivisible atom, instead of the fiction of a perfectly self-sufficient individual, free of all ties and armed with ever new rights. This refoundation should be inspired by the gratuitousness and the indispensability of the relationship between mother and daughter-o.

It is, in short, a revolution as it has always been understood by most of the world's women: a symbolic transformation that is irresistible and can no longer be postponed.

It is, as he wrote Luisa Muraro (At the market for happiness) of that maternal power that "becomes a principle of civilisation at the disposal of human coexistence.".

This is why health and care - of which we have so much experience over thousands of years - must once again be placed at the heart of our thinking and our practices..

Marina Terragni


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
11 September 2023
Female wombs in male bodies
The envious dream of all time -to be able to have children without women, to erase mothers, in short, the Grail- is getting closer and closer to being realised: in five to ten years' time, even biologically male trans people will be able to receive a womb transplant and conduct a gestation. An 'inclusive' wish-right that would improve their quality of life and alleviate the symptoms of dysphoria. While the lives and health of girls and boys born from these practices are of no concern to bioethicists
Euronews reports on the rapid progress of research on the uterus transplantation front, with particular reference to the request of trans MtF people whose bodies remain biologically male, while FtM people, if they retain their female genital apparatus, can undertake a pregnancy like any other woman: the 'pregnant fathers' that the mainstream press likes to report on are none other than women who self-identify as men. In the article, which we translate here, women are referred to as cis- women, suffixed [...]
Read now
4 August 2023
Lesbian motherhood: open letter to Kathleen Stock
The gender critical philosopher says she is concerned about the rights of lesbian mothers being denied 'by the Meloni government'. But it was the judiciary and not the government that decided that only biological mothers can appear on birth certificates. In order for the law to recognise sexual difference in procreation, it is necessary for homosexual women to break the front with wealthy gay males who resort to surrogacy: homogeny is just ideology
We have been following closely and sisterly the story of Kathleen Stock, gender critical philosopher, author among others of Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism (Little, Brown Book Group, 2021) and former lecturer at the University of Sussex persecuted by transactivists: we have told her story here. Together with Martina Navratilova and Julie Bindel Stock she recently founded The Lesbian Project with the aim of reaffirming the specificity of lesbian identity. The aim of the project is 'to stop the disappearance of lesbians in the rainbow soup and to give [...]
Read now
3 August 2023
The 'right' to have a slave: Hagar and the womb for rent
For days, the supporters of the GPA have been jubilantly spreading the 'news': even God allows a woman to bear children for others, as the biblical account of Sarah -wife of Abraham unable to conceive- and her servant Hagar who lent her womb shows. So today, too, temporary slaves are being claimed: a real ethical and political short-circuit. And an autogoal. Also because the Genesis account should be read in its entirety
For days on social media, the supporters of the womb for rent, in particular many LGBT+ activists and their supporters, have been reviving the story of the slave girl Hagar and her son Ishmael (Genesis 16 and 21) to support the lawfulness and goodness of their cause. The meaning would be: even God allows a woman to bear a child for others. So: nothing wrong with our claim. In fact, we too are entitled to have female slaves. A logical, political and ethical short-circuit. They do not know [...]
Read now
2 August 2023
Escaping trans madness
'I want it to be known that there is hope. Young people with 'gender dysphoria' and their families can be helped with a psychological course,' writes American psychiatrist Miriam Grossman in her latest book. Explaining in detail and empathically her therapeutic proposal. And indicating in the hammering propaganda of the transcult the most insidious obstacle
Miriam Grossman is an American psychiatrist. The following is an edited extract published by Gender Clinic News of her new essay Lost in Trans Nation: A Child Psychiatrist's Guide Out of the Madness. It is a very interesting and 'empathetic' read, especially for those families facing the problem of a teenage daughter/daughter with 'gender discomfort'. James sports a scruffy beard. Sarah wears skirts and doesn't bother with pronouns. Taylor wants to talk about college, not the [...]
Read now
29 July 2023
Making babies in vitro: The Economist special
The weekly acknowledges the high failure rate of assisted fertilisation and explains the new techniques -from gametogenesis to mitochondrial replacement- wishing for rapid progress. But it is silent on the risks to children's health. And it does not speak of infertility prevention: a commitment that would damage the enormous business
The weekly magazine The Economist devotes a long special to the subject of assisted reproduction, entitled Making Babymaking Better, first of all acknowledging that although performance has been improving the number of failures of these techniques is still very high. On average 7-8 attempts out of 10 fail, a number of failures that increases in parallel with the age of the woman: menopause is a process that only occurs in human females and some whale species. The [...]
Read now
17 July 2023
Vagina? No. It's called an 'extra hole'
Woke language claims to be inclusive at the exclusive expense of women, who must literally disappear: pregnancy, breastfeeding, female sex organs can no longer be named so as not to offend the trans and non-binary ultra-minorities. It is the latest ridiculous move of the dying patriarchy that has built itself up from the very beginning on the marginalisation and erasure of the feminine. It still tries, but it will not succeed
Transactivists are ridiculous: in order not to 'offend' the ultra-exiguous minority of women who declare themselves male while retaining the female genital organ, the vagina can no longer be called that. Bonus hole, extra hole: this is the term. Even front hole no longer suffices: its unserviceability must be better emphasised. A relentless work to erase women from language and the symbolic, a move in extremis by the patriarchy that has built itself from the beginning on the erasure and abjection of the feminine, [...].
Read now
1 2 3 ... 24