11 November 2022

Iranian Beauty

In Iran, female beauty becomes the lever of a real revolution: nothing like the mortification-commodification of bodies that is propagated as freedom in the West. The struggle to be able to be a woman reveals the'hypocrisy of the queer
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

It is now almost two months since the Iranian girls' revolt against the veil, an irrepressible wave that every day produces new images, new content, a breath of fresh air in relation to certain narratives about women in the Islamic world, but also a mirror that reveals how much of an artefact there is behind so many politically correct buzzwords of intersectional feminism or transfeminism.

First: the veil is not a free choice, nor is feminist empowerment on which we have been bombarded for years by the western, liberal left, which for too many years now has been supporting and promoting the glamourisation of this 'garment' (increasingly common among young people in schools, both here in Italy and in France, where the identity game has reached dramatic peaks), with more or less explicit support for radical Islam groups.

Until a couple of years ago our policies when visiting Iran or receiving influential members of that theocratic regime in Rome, flaunted a devout and very modest veil despite the harsh anti-first martyr protests (that's the name) of a cause that is shaking Iran to its foundations today. Since a few days ago, here is the new and creative form of protest of those extraordinary girls who are filmed and photographed while striking the mullahs from behind, causing their turbans to fall in the dust and running away: an ingenious, irreverent, genuine, anarchic, incorrect gesture that will certainly go down in history

No talk, no proclamations, a simple, spontaneous gesture, almost childlike, truly iconic. Much more than many useless words.

Second: Iranian women demand 'normal' rights, to live, study, work, move around, no sex work is work, wombs for rent, hormones for children, feminist pornography and other amenities about which we are torn. Let alone the fear of appearing politically incorrect, which paralyses even our thinking here: they have understood perfectly well that patriarchs, with or without beards, Sunni or Shia, secular or religious, conservative or progressive, are all the same in oppressing, beating and killing women. No downcast eyes, 'modest fashion' or fashion halal so dear to western designers who rub their hands together for a colossal market, no 'self-determined' influencers who teach their followers how to style their instrument of oppression in a vexatious and cool way: they rip it off, set it on fire.

Third: hair. In the early days of the protest all enchanted by the transgressive gesture of the sisters cutting their hair in the streets, immediately imitated by Western actresses, singers and journalists who actually only spiked their hair by a few centimetres. Photos and videos show us braids, ringlets, hairstyles that we have not seen for almost a century, since the days of the 'little boys' who claimed modern and practical heads, bobs and short fringes. Here in reverse freedom relies on the display of hair worthy of ancient goddessespatiently cared for in secret and now flaunted as pride, a challenge to a male power that sees them with desire to be feared for their destructiveness, a powerful instrument of seduction and therefore perdition in the eyes of the pious defenders of morality and decency.

Fourth: beauty. In the videos and images, Iranians are beautiful, and this squares away so many of our beliefs and prejudices that Feminism often calls for the renunciation of beauty as surrender to male desire. A story that comes from afar, that tears us apart and divides us: Gloria Steinem remembered how her attractiveness was a real handicap for her, which diminished her credibility. To free ourselves from the patriarchal grip, we should renounce the beauty we read as stereotyping and subordination.

Iran's radically anti-patriarchal women's movement does not need this, nor does it need moustachioed matrioskas or mutilation. Neither does it need a haircut. That gesture does not mean giving up beauty in exchange for freedom.

Iranian women do not talk about non-conforming bodies, their bodies are the most conforming and therefore the most dangerous there is . They know very well that they are oppressed precisely because of that sexualised body, so much desired, so much envied, so much feared by the males of the last 5000 years at every latitude. And they have realised that they will not win this war by hiding, mutilating and mortifying themselves.

They walk tall and free, their bodies are in the streets and squares, bodies that are very different from how the liberal West thinks of them, healthy bodies, not denuded, not exhibited, not commodified, not pornified, not mutilated, not hormonised. Clear, proud gazes, faces of ancient beauty. You see these girls and thequeer hypocrisy (here Pakistani writer Bina Shah's splendid response to Judith Butler): their challenge prison and death precisely because they are women.

Anna Perenna

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
25 February 2024
The 'milk' of men
The English National Health Service ensures that the milk produced by a male body -stimulated with ad hoc drug therapy- is as good for the newborn as that of its mother, who is wiped out. Minimising the risks to the child's health largely offset by the ideological and symbolic benefits. It is the transhuman, my beauties!
Men's 'milk' is a perfect example of what we call transhuman. Women's milk, on the other hand, is human, all too human, it is the perfect model of the enduring human, and therefore natural breastfeeding should be degraded, mocked, stigmatised as something to be ashamed of and kept hidden. In fact, it is even a useless and unethical act. On the contrary, promoting and magnifying male 'breastfeeding' shows plastically the way forward. According to the prestigious journal Pediatrics, organ of the American Academy of Pediatrics, it is 'risky' to define [...]
Read now
15 February 2024
How to convince progressives to give up gender
Terrified of transactivists and worried about sounding 'right-wing', left-wingers support the transition of minors even in the absence of studies showing that 'affirmative therapy' works and promotes the well-being of gender non-conforming girls and boys. "But everyone has a right to evidence-based medicine," argue some liberals determined to "break the spell". And they start DIAG -Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender- to convince democrats in the US and around the world that continuing on this path is wrong and dangerous. For children and for the left. An article by Bernard Lane
A new movement of US Democrats wants to find out how to break the spell of gender ideology and bring the party back to the liberal values of science and reason. Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender (DIAG) launched a project yesterday on X Space (Twitter) to commission research on how to more effectively reach out to left-wing voters who believe that science is now in favour of 'gender-affirming' medicalisation of gender non-conforming youth. "The only way to end this [...]
Read now
6 February 2024
New York Times: Strong doubts about hormones for children with gender dysphoria
The world's leading woke newspaper has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, starting with the indecent treatment of JK Rowling. Today the paper changes course and in a very long article criticises the 'affirmative therapy' (puberty blockers, hormones and surgery) for trans minors, giving a voice to some hitherto censored and ostracised detransitioners. Because by now even many Democratic voters have strong doubts. And there is a risk of losing many readers: "get woke, go broke".
For years, the New York Times has been the world's leading woke newspaper and has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, jubilating critical voices. The treatment of JK Rowling is exemplary. In 2022 a very violent subscription campaign invited people to imagine Harry Potter without its creator: the ultimate in cancel culture (see here) A misogynistic and aggressive gesture - the initiative turned out to be a boomerang and many female subscribers threatened to cancel -. A few months ago The Daily published [...].
Read now
22 January 2024
Men IntintA and other wonders
The health of 'Marco', a trans FtM who is five months pregnant with testosterone, and that of her baby are the least of the problems. What matters to the liberal press talking about an 'anthropological revolution' is whether 'Marco' is to be called mother or father. But only a woman can give birth even if at the registry office her name is male. In this nothing has changed since the dawn of time. In the meantime, the trans front is losing ground: in one year, the number of members of WPATH, the largest transgender health organisation, has fallen by 60 per cent.
La Repubblica online headlines with a triple somersault about the 'young man who got pregnant': pregnant is not dared even at the transphilic GEDI group. The story is that of 'Marco', a girl undergoing testosterone therapy to look more like a man: beard, graver voice -not to 'become male' because sex cannot be changed and every single cell will remain damned XX-. 'Marco' had retained his uterus and ovaries and following a hetero sexual relationship (a [...]
Read now
11 January 2024
Child rapists: shock report in UK
In Great Britain, 18 rapes a day are committed by minors on their peers: in 2022 these cases numbered 15,000, almost always by very young males. A British police report shows how free access to violent pornography online is normalising criminal sexual behaviour in England and all other Western countries
For years, we have been reporting on the psychological and material damage produced on an entire generation by free access to violent online pornography, consumed by boys and girls from the age of 7 but also much earlier: gang rapes committed by minors are just the tip of the iceberg of this dramatic phenomenon, which has now been analysed and quantified by a study by the British police. On this topic you can find previous articles here, here, here and here. We were almost only [...]
Read now
7 January 2024
New Hampshire: No more 'sex change' surgery on minors
The US state has passed a bill banning surgeons from performing operations on under-18 year olds such as the removal of ovaries and breasts for females and penises and testicles for males. The bill states that these operations violate the patient's 'informed consent' and points out that studies have not shown a decrease in the suicide risk of minors after the operations. On the contrary: the danger increases
New Hampshire is preparing to ban under-18s from undergoing sex-change operations. Last Thursday, the New Hampshire House of Representatives passed a bill to this effect, also with the help of some Democratic members. House Bill 619 prohibits doctors from performing 'any genital gender reassignment surgery', i.e. the removal of the uterus, ovaries and breasts in the case of women; testicles and penis for men, to anyone in the [...]
Read now
1 2 3 44