4 October 2022

US, gay couple sues: surrogacy is a 'right', must be paid for by health insurance

The two men's claim aims to have the fact that they do not have a womb recognised as a 'disability': an absurd, envious and revealing claim. If they win in court all over America insurance companies and employers would have to reimburse gestations for other for men
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

A gay couple initiated a lawsuit in New York labour court demanding that the employer-provided insurance pay for all the costs of the surrogacy instead of them, in order to ensure 'equal access to fertility treatment'. For all intents and purposes, a gay male couple is required by law to become a protected category as they both lacked a uterus and had no access to a uterus.

If they win their case, surrogacy only for gay male couples would become the responsibility of health insurance companies or employers throughout the US.

The Guardian, in a lengthy article on the affair, describes the couple as follows: 'Corey Briskin and Nicholas Maggipinto met in law school in 2011, got engaged in 2014 and announced their marriage in 2016 on the New York Times. They moved into a waterfront apartment building in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, with a bright family game room on the ground floor'.

The couple tells of having learned the costs of a biological child through surrogacy during an appointment with a fertility doctor provided by the organisation Gay Parents to Be (Future gay parents), advertised on Instagram. "Maggipinto takes 15 minutes to explain to me all the expenses they would have to incur if they tried to have a child genetically related to one of their own. The end result? "At least two hundred thousand dollars" says, tapping his index finger on the table with every word in disbelief,' writes the journalist of the Guardian.

"They could not afford it. Maggipinto receives a lawyer's salary at a large firm, but is burdened with student debt. Briskin worked for the city of New York as an assistant district attorney, earning about $60,000 per year. His job benefits included generous health insurance. But when they read the policy have discovered that they are the only category of people excluded from IVF (in vitro fertilisation). Infertility was defined as the inability to have a child through heterosexual sex or intrauterine insemination. This meant that heterosexuals and lesbians working for the city of New York would be able to cover the costs of IVF, but gay couples would never be able to benefit from it'.

"Briskin and Maggipinto then presented a class action complaint to the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against the city of New York, suing Briskin's former employers for unlawful discrimination in the workplace. If they win, employers and health insurers across the US will be forced to change their policies to give homosexual males the same access to fertility benefits as everyone else.".

In essence, the couple claims that the city's insurance policy discriminates against them because, if they were two women or if they were in a heterosexual relationship, 'they would have access to the IVF benefits to which city employees are entitled'.

USA, coppia gay fa causa: l'utero in affitto è un "diritto", va pagato dall'assicurazione sanitaria
American feminist Phyllis Chesler

The American feminist Phyllis Chesler summarises the story as follows: 'They protest against the 'injustice' of not being born biologically female. Although they are both educated and affluent white men, they denounce the 'discrimination' due to the accident of their birth, which, despite their educational, economic, social, legal and sporting privilege, seek to have the 'disabled' or protected class declared. They also claim the 'right to fertility' of gay males'.

"I guess, to some extent, womb envy may play a role in the demand for a so-called 'reproductive justice' for gay men,' Chesler continues. In fact, 'while women without male partners (singles and lesbians) can access relatively low-tech assistance to reproduce, men without female partners need to resort to surrogacy to achieve exclusive genetic parenting.

And so, gay men now want insurance companies to treat the fact of being born male as a disability or as a protected category, claiming compensation. They are concerned that the money and legal power of gay men may override the rights of children, egg donor women and birth mothers, who do not have equivalent economic or political power."

Full article here. Here Phyllis Chesler's essay.

Translation by Maria Celeste

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
15 February 2024
How to convince progressives to give up gender
Terrified of transactivists and worried about sounding 'right-wing', left-wingers support the transition of minors even in the absence of studies showing that 'affirmative therapy' works and promotes the well-being of gender non-conforming girls and boys. "But everyone has a right to evidence-based medicine," argue some liberals determined to "break the spell". And they start DIAG -Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender- to convince democrats in the US and around the world that continuing on this path is wrong and dangerous. For children and for the left. An article by Bernard Lane
A new movement of US Democrats wants to find out how to break the spell of gender ideology and bring the party back to the liberal values of science and reason. Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender (DIAG) launched a project yesterday on X Space (Twitter) to commission research on how to more effectively reach out to left-wing voters who believe that science is now in favour of 'gender-affirming' medicalisation of gender non-conforming youth. "The only way to end this [...]
Read now
6 February 2024
New York Times: Strong doubts about hormones for children with gender dysphoria
The world's leading woke newspaper has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, starting with the indecent treatment of JK Rowling. Today the paper changes course and in a very long article criticises the 'affirmative therapy' (puberty blockers, hormones and surgery) for trans minors, giving a voice to some hitherto censored and ostracised detransitioners. Because by now even many Democratic voters have strong doubts. And there is a risk of losing many readers: "get woke, go broke".
For years, the New York Times has been the world's leading woke newspaper and has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, jubilating critical voices. The treatment of JK Rowling is exemplary. In 2022 a very violent subscription campaign invited people to imagine Harry Potter without its creator: the ultimate in cancel culture (see here) A misogynistic and aggressive gesture - the initiative turned out to be a boomerang and many female subscribers threatened to cancel -. A few months ago The Daily published [...].
Read now
22 January 2024
Men IntintA and other wonders
The health of 'Marco', a trans FtM who is five months pregnant with testosterone, and that of her baby are the least of the problems. What matters to the liberal press talking about an 'anthropological revolution' is whether 'Marco' is to be called mother or father. But only a woman can give birth even if at the registry office her name is male. In this nothing has changed since the dawn of time. In the meantime, the trans front is losing ground: in one year, the number of members of WPATH, the largest transgender health organisation, has fallen by 60 per cent.
La Repubblica online headlines with a triple somersault about the 'young man who got pregnant': pregnant is not dared even at the transphilic GEDI group. The story is that of 'Marco', a girl undergoing testosterone therapy to look more like a man: beard, graver voice -not to 'become male' because sex cannot be changed and every single cell will remain damned XX-. 'Marco' had retained his uterus and ovaries and following a hetero sexual relationship (a [...]
Read now
11 January 2024
Child rapists: shock report in UK
In Great Britain, 18 rapes a day are committed by minors on their peers: in 2022 these cases numbered 15,000, almost always by very young males. A British police report shows how free access to violent pornography online is normalising criminal sexual behaviour in England and all other Western countries
For years, we have been reporting on the psychological and material damage produced on an entire generation by free access to violent online pornography, consumed by boys and girls from the age of 7 but also much earlier: gang rapes committed by minors are just the tip of the iceberg of this dramatic phenomenon, which has now been analysed and quantified by a study by the British police. On this topic you can find previous articles here, here, here and here. We were almost only [...]
Read now
7 January 2024
New Hampshire: No more 'sex change' surgery on minors
The US state has passed a bill banning surgeons from performing operations on under-18 year olds such as the removal of ovaries and breasts for females and penises and testicles for males. The bill states that these operations violate the patient's 'informed consent' and points out that studies have not shown a decrease in the suicide risk of minors after the operations. On the contrary: the danger increases
New Hampshire is preparing to ban under-18s from undergoing sex-change operations. Last Thursday, the New Hampshire House of Representatives passed a bill to this effect, also with the help of some Democratic members. House Bill 619 prohibits doctors from performing 'any genital gender reassignment surgery', i.e. the removal of the uterus, ovaries and breasts in the case of women; testicles and penis for men, to anyone in the [...]
Read now
31 December 2023
Puberty should perhaps be stopped at ALL: Transhuman drift of the World Health Organisation
In a veritable Christmas blitz, the WHO announces that it wants to draw up new gender-affirming guidelines and sets up a panel made up of three-quarters transactivists in favour of medicalising children. Preferably all of them, even those who do not suffer from dysphoria. Because choosing what sex you are must become a universal right. An international petition calls for a halt to the initiative
A few days before Christmas, the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced that it will develop new guidelines on the 'health of trans and gender diverse people', with a focus on access to hormones and surgery (what it calls 'gender-inclusive care.) ') and legal recognition of gender self-identification (self id). The WHO also announced that it has formed a group to develop the guidelines. This expert group includes many World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) apparatchiks, including [...]
Read now
1 2 3 39