4 October 2022

US, gay couple sues: surrogacy is a 'right', must be paid for by health insurance

The two men's claim aims to have the fact that they do not have a womb recognised as a 'disability': an absurd, envious and revealing claim. If they win in court all over America insurance companies and employers would have to reimburse gestations for other for men
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

A gay couple initiated a lawsuit in New York labour court demanding that the employer-provided insurance pay for all the costs of the surrogacy instead of them, in order to ensure 'equal access to fertility treatment'. For all intents and purposes, a gay male couple is required by law to become a protected category as they both lacked a uterus and had no access to a uterus.

If they win their case, surrogacy only for gay male couples would become the responsibility of health insurance companies or employers throughout the US.

The Guardian, in a lengthy article on the affair, describes the couple as follows: 'Corey Briskin and Nicholas Maggipinto met in law school in 2011, got engaged in 2014 and announced their marriage in 2016 on the New York Times. They moved into a waterfront apartment building in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, with a bright family game room on the ground floor'.

The couple tells of having learned the costs of a biological child through surrogacy during an appointment with a fertility doctor provided by the organisation Gay Parents to Be (Future gay parents), advertised on Instagram. "Maggipinto takes 15 minutes to explain to me all the expenses they would have to incur if they tried to have a child genetically related to one of their own. The end result? "At least two hundred thousand dollars" says, tapping his index finger on the table with every word in disbelief,' writes the journalist of the Guardian.

"They could not afford it. Maggipinto receives a lawyer's salary at a large firm, but is burdened with student debt. Briskin worked for the city of New York as an assistant district attorney, earning about $60,000 per year. His job benefits included generous health insurance. But when they read the policy have discovered that they are the only category of people excluded from IVF (in vitro fertilisation). Infertility was defined as the inability to have a child through heterosexual sex or intrauterine insemination. This meant that heterosexuals and lesbians working for the city of New York would be able to cover the costs of IVF, but gay couples would never be able to benefit from it'.

"Briskin and Maggipinto then presented a class action complaint to the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against the city of New York, suing Briskin's former employers for unlawful discrimination in the workplace. If they win, employers and health insurers across the US will be forced to change their policies to give homosexual males the same access to fertility benefits as everyone else.".

In essence, the couple claims that the city's insurance policy discriminates against them because, if they were two women or if they were in a heterosexual relationship, 'they would have access to the IVF benefits to which city employees are entitled'.

USA, coppia gay fa causa: l'utero in affitto è un "diritto", va pagato dall'assicurazione sanitaria
American feminist Phyllis Chesler

The American feminist Phyllis Chesler summarises the story as follows: 'They protest against the 'injustice' of not being born biologically female. Although they are both educated and affluent white men, they denounce the 'discrimination' due to the accident of their birth, which, despite their educational, economic, social, legal and sporting privilege, seek to have the 'disabled' or protected class declared. They also claim the 'right to fertility' of gay males'.

"I guess, to some extent, womb envy may play a role in the demand for a so-called 'reproductive justice' for gay men,' Chesler continues. In fact, 'while women without male partners (singles and lesbians) can access relatively low-tech assistance to reproduce, men without female partners need to resort to surrogacy to achieve exclusive genetic parenting.

And so, gay men now want insurance companies to treat the fact of being born male as a disability or as a protected category, claiming compensation. They are concerned that the money and legal power of gay men may override the rights of children, egg donor women and birth mothers, who do not have equivalent economic or political power."

Full article here. Here Phyllis Chesler's essay.

Translation by Maria Celeste


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
14 April 2024
Hormone-addicted children: an in vivo trial. Who will pay for it?
Hilary Cass, the British paediatrician who produced a monumental report on 'affirmative therapy' for minors does not mince words: those children 'were used as footballs'. There has never been any evidence that puberty blockers work, that they reduce suicide risk, that they increase patients' well-being: far from it. Will those who, in the absence of scientific certainty, have inflicted these treatments, who have even persecuted so many people of goodwill determined to expose the scandal in the name of truth, go unpunished? Keira Bell, the best known detransitioner, hopes for criminal consequences
Englishwoman Keira Bell, a former patient of the Tavistock Clinic in London, is certainly the most famous of the de-transitioners. After the publication of the Cass Review she tells The Times that she would like to see criminal proceedings started so that the children treated by the clinic with puberty blockers and hormones can finally get justice. Keira is now 27, judges the treatment she was subjected to -blockers, hormones, removal of breasts- "experimental at best, destructive at worst" and believes the professionals have [...]
Read now
10 April 2024
UK. Cass report: no more affirmative therapy for children with gender-related problems
Pediatrician Hilary Cass' final report on child transitions comes out: offering affirmative therapy was a failure. There is no evidence on the effectiveness of puberty blockers, which should never be prescribed except in rare cases. Hormones of the opposite sex should not be given before the age of 18, and even between 18 and 25 caution should be exercised. A definitive watershed
The long-awaited final report of the Cass Review, an independent review chaired by paediatrician Hilary Cass on public health services for children and young people with 'gender dysphoria', came out this morning. Its final report and recommendations were presented to NHS England. Here are the highlights. The condemnation for affirmative therapy is final, and determined by the absolute lack of evidence that puberty blockers and opposite-sex hormones bring real benefits to children suffering from 'gender incongruence [...]
Read now
28 March 2024
Hormone therapies on children: doctors' insurances start to run away
The risk of million-dollar claims by minors undergoing irreversible treatment who regret the 'affirmative therapy' is too high: this is why some insurance companies no longer feel like covering 'gender medicine' under their policies
Those who resist the market for the transition of gender non-conforming girls and boys know very well that almost always the turning point - as was the case in the UK with Keira Bell and in the US with Chloe Cole - is the lawsuit brought by a former child-or treated-or with blockers and hormones against the doctors who administered the 'therapy': the detransitioners' side is decisive. Then the game becomes money versus money: the money collected by the gender clinics versus the money they end up [...].
Read now
23 March 2024
Also in Wyoming stop the transition of minors
It is the 24th US state to ban drug and surgical treatments on the bodies of gender non-conforming girls and boys. Doctors and practitioners who continue to prescribe affirmative therapy will lose their licences. Decisive in the passage of the law was the testimony - and legal action - of detransitioner Chloe Cole. A regulation banning trans-indoctrination in schools was also approved.
From next 1 July, hormone treatments and gender transition surgery of minors will be banned in Wyoming. With the passage of the law, Senate File 99, Wyoming will join 23 other US states, from Alabama to West Virginia, that have banned or severely restricted gender-affirming medicine on minors. Under the law, doctors, pharmacists and other health care providers who provide gender-affirming care could have their licences suspended or revoked. Opposed by Governor Mark Gordon, [...]
Read now
12 March 2024
The UK has decided: no more puberty blockers for children with dysphoria. It is the ultimate turning point (in memory of Yarden Silveira, 1998-2021, killed by 'sex change')
Not only the stop at the Tavistock Clinic: no British centre for 'gender non-conforming' girls and boys will be able to prescribe puberty blockers any more. The approach will have to be solely psychological: a resounding turning point that will have knock-on effects all over the world, including Italy. One of the biggest scandals in the history of medicine is finally coming to an end: will someone pay for the thousands of irreversibly damaged minors? Recalling here one among them who lost his life because of the unscrupulousness of doctors and surgeons
The British National Health Service (NHS) announces that PUBERTY BLOCKERS WILL NO LONGER BE ADMINISTRATED TO MINORS WITH GENDER Dysphoria: this is huge and heart-warming news after years and years of fighting on the front line. So not only is the dedicated service of the Tavistock Clinic in London closing, but no centre for the treatment of minors with dysphoria will use puberty blockers any more. The decision, described as 'historic', will have knock-on effects worldwide, [...].
Read now
6 March 2024
WPATH scandal: 'therapies' for children with dysphoria are improvised and prescribed without real consent
The World Professional Transgender Health is considered the leading global scientific and medical authority on 'gender medicine': over the past decades its standards of care have shaped the guidelines, policies and practices of governments, medical associations, public health systems and private clinics worldwide, including the WHO. But leaked documents reveal the neglect of children -including children with severe mental disorders- subjected to improvised treatments, without taking into account the long-term consequences and without being sure they were clear about what they were doing
The news manages to shock even those who have long fought against affirmative therapy - puberty blockers, hormones and surgery - for gender non-conforming minors, such as psychoanalyst David Bell who exposed the scandal at the Tavistock Clinic in London: 'Even for me the contents of these files are shocking and disturbing,' he said. "The files suggest that some WPATH members are aware that gender-affirming treatments sometimes cause very serious harm and [...]
Read now
1 2 3 40