An anti-censorship desk to protect lecturers gagged by queers in universities

Transactivist censorship is rapidly spreading in Italian universities, preventing the free flow of thought. What is needed is a free speech law modelled on the British Higher Education Bill. And right now it should be possible to denounce intimidation in safety, without reprisals and dismissal.
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

In British and American academia, deplatforming (gagging) of critical lecturers on free gender identity (self-id) is a well-established phenomenon. (we have talked about this several times, see here e here).

It was one of the main signs of the enormous lobbying power of transactivism. The case Kathleen Stock, feminist and lesbian lecturer at the University of Sussex, probably marks the point of no return: read the story here. Stock has suffered heavy attacks by a trans collective at the university, which requested the dismissal for 'transphobia. Stock was suggested to have an escort. It is unclear how the story will end, as a university union, the University and College Union, has called for an investigation into the professor's 'transphobic' positions, and she fears that his career is effectively over.

All this despite the fact that among the 30 or so bills announced in the Queen's Speech last May, in which Elizabeth gave a reading of the government's programme, there is also the proposal for a law obliging universities and also Students' Unions to guarantee freedom of expression to everyone, whether students, lecturers or external speakers, allowing those who have been censured to claim compensation. Education Minister Gavin Williamson called it the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill a "historic" bill, "a milestone" to counter "the evil of the chilling effects of campus censorship"on students, staff and speakers "who do not feel free to have their say".

La cancel-culture 'woke' (in essence, only the 'awakened' have a right to speak, and one of the overwhelming proofs that you are still guiltily asleep is to believe that biological sex exists) is also rapidly spreading in Italy. I have personally been silenced at least a few times for being 'gender critical' (transphobic, according to my accusers). The well-known Californian liberal feminist Rebecca Solnit refused to discuss with me (no-debate) 24 hours before our meeting that had been planned for months at Mantua's Festivaletteratura: see here. Some time earlier, an attempt at deplatforming was made by the director of the Fashion Design and Multimedia Arts degree course at the University of Turin.Iuav University of Venicewho asked me to withdraw from teaching because my 'positions' - without specifying which ones - were 'unpalatable both to the students and to me'. Of course I did not withdraw. My positions are being unilaterally described by a letter from the students, significant in that it is a literal 'photocopy' of the demands of the 'woke' youth on American campuses:

Dear Professor X and dear Professors Y and Z, I am sending this email on behalf of all of us students on the Master's degree course in Communication Management and Cultural Policy. We are puzzled by the appointment of Marina Terragni as head of the 'Philosophy and Ethics of Contemporary Information' course, scheduled for the second module. In light of the reactionary and exclusionary positions expressed in many articles on his blog and public posts on his social pages, we therefore oppose this choice. We claim this opposition because we consider his positions that are not simply far removed from ours, but more seriously offensive and irreconcilable with the project of IUAV and this master's degree. Suffice it to mention the university's openness to careers with alias identity', against theTerragni's opposition to 'self-id'. and self-determination of trans people, but also the unfounded criticism of queer theories, which we are happy to see included in the content of the master. This choice threatens the integrity of a pathway explicitly linked to feminist, intersectional and queer discourses, and potentially questions its classrooms as a safe space. We are prompted to say this first and foremost by Terragni's use of communication platforms, so central to this teaching. We ask for explanations for this choice, with esteem and trust in his judgement, but we support our position with equal conviction. We welcome his invitation to a transformative thought and practice, but this is not the direction in which we want the master to proceed. Cordially, the Master's Student Body

I am in an ideal position to fight against the gag: I am not economically blackmailable.. It was in fact only an occasional service for me. Not a teaching field. The situation is quite different for all those teachers who make their living from this and who are not in a position to fight because if they do they risk losing their jobs. They know that will find a position and retain it much more easily if they align their teaching with transactivist and queer thinking.

Students pay to go to university and they don't want any tricks: spaces must be "safe", i.e. you have to decide what you want to hear, and you have to get exactly what you expect (when in fact the experience of knowledge is to come across what you do not expect.).

La University Minister Maria Cristina Messa should be constantly updated on the situation in Italian universities: the phenomenon has not yet become chronic in our country. In order to ensure the circulation of free thought, one should think about a Higher Education model law (Freedom of Speech) Bill.

As early as possible, as soon as possible, you could set up an 'anti-censorship desk' at the Ministrywhich can be safely accessed by teachers, students and deplatformed speakers for a protection against violence against their freedom of teaching, guaranteed by the Constitution.

Marina Terragni


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
You can send to: ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE BLU BRAMANTE
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
5 July 2022
Women attacked from left and right: the ash on the head of the New York Times
As the organ of the liberals and woke culture, the great US newspaper has been undertaking a vigorous change of course for a few months now, admitting its own excesses and the misogyny of the new progressive course committed to wiping out women. While waiting for the self-critical wind to blow in Europe too
by Pamela Paul Perhaps it makes sense that women - complacent and pleasant-looking creatures, selfless and just as pretty - were the ones who finally brought our polarised country together. Because the far right and the far left have found the one thing they can agree on: women don't matter. The position of the right is best known, the movement has been aggressively dedicated for decades to depriving women of basic rights. Thanks also to two judges [...]
Read now
27 June 2022
New England Journal of Medicine: abortion ban is a health catastrophe
The prestigious magazine raises the alarm: it will be mainly poor and black women who will pay the price of the Supreme Court ruling, driven back into abortion with serious health risks. Even the morning-after pill and even the IUD could be banned and prosecuted as abortifacient means
The US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization represents an extraordinary reversal (...) Yet it was not unexpected. In the long and painful prelude to the decision, many states severely restricted access to reproductive health care. The fig leaf covering these restrictions was that induced abortion was a dangerous procedure that required stricter regulation to protect the health of women seeking such care. The facts belie this false rhetoric. The latest data available in the United States [...]
Read now
27 June 2022
How they won the war against Roe
Failure to turn Roe v. Wade into law was the capital mistake of the American left, starting with Barack Obama. Abortion was an entirely secondary issue for trans-politics-absorbed liberals, who have spent years erasing the word 'woman' by renaming it as 'menstruator' and 'uterus carrier', rather than addressing women's rights
How did American pro-lifers win the war against Roe v. Wade? In the article of which we present you with extended excerpts, journalist Sarah Ditum explains how the Democrats' neglect and arrogance unwittingly helped set women's rights in America back 50 years. "When did it become certain that American women's right to abortion would be revoked? The Supreme Court's ruling that "Roe was terribly wrong from the start" leaked almost two months ago, [...]
Read now
25 June 2022
US midterm elections: will women be decisive after the abortion ruling?
What will American women do now? Will they win solidarity among themselves, as they have always won in Italy over abortion? Or will they settle into opposing sides in a quasi-civil war? The November vote will be the first test. Women could form the strong core of that moderate front that cannot find political expression in the US
What will American women do now? Will they win solidarity among themselves, as they have always won in Italy with regard to abortion, holding together Catholics and agnostics, left-wing and right-wing women in defence of law 194/78? Or will they settle into opposing camps, to put it mildly, the quasi-civil war underway in the United States? The midterm elections in November, with the Republicans as favourites, will be the first test: how many female voters, albeit [...].
Read now
23 June 2022
Trans issue: change of wind among progressives
The 'la' is given by the American Democrats, but also in the rest of the West the trans-filia of the progressives is beginning to show signs of breaking down. Electoral opportunism, sure. But the change must be registered. Keeping our eyes wide open
Michele Serra is a friend and I appreciate very much that he has taken it upon himself to break the silence from the left -finally- on the unbearable injustice of male bodies in women's sports (L'Amaca in La Repubblica yesterday, 22 June), an injustice against which we have been fighting for a long time (here you will find an infinity of texts on this subject). A note, if possible: I would have avoided using the woke cisgender definition, imposed by transactivism, and in which the vast majority of women in the world, athletes and non-athletes alike, [...].
Read now
20 June 2022
But women still exist
We don't like the title too much, especially that laconic 'again', but thanks to La Repubblica for hosting our intervention in the debate that started with Michela Marzano's text entitled 'Se non è il sesso a fare la donna'. We republish it here because you cannot find it on'online
Published in La Repubblica our text in the debate opened by Michela Marzano with her intervention on 'women with penises' and other wonders. We are keeping the original title that was given to our intervention so as not to cause confusion, even if we do not like it much. Here is the full text to follow. What is a woman? She is the one who brought us into the world, each and every one of us. Of this there can be no doubt. Which in no way means that [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 38