University of Barcelona: feminist professor boycotted by queer students

Another Stock case, this time in the Catalan university. Feminist writer and lecturer Juana Gallego was targeted because of her gender criticism. Cases are multiplying in all western academies, but the authorities are watching. The initiative in support of the teacher launched by Spanish feminism
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article
Juana Gallego, writer and lecturer at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona -Gender and Communication Master is under attack by students queer that before the start of the course they announced to the master coordinator that they would boycotted his lessons because of the ideas that he expresses in the media or on his blog.
A story reminiscent of many other teachers - the most famous case being that of Kathleen Stock- removed from universities for their gender-critical positions. 
The question of censorship in academies we have spoken several times: see here e here, here and again here.  
Spanish feminists in the network Confluencia Movimiento Feminista have issued a statement in support of Gallego -follows the translated text-: you can join the initiative by clicking here. 
    
"The feminist movement is already being persecuted in Spain despite the fact that the 'trans law' has not yet been passed. This law provides for sanctions, revocation of licences from those who dare to disagree on the basis of scientific and professional ethical criteria, as well as revocation of foster care and disciplinary sanctions for neglect to families and legal guardians of underage youth. It is a gag law that justifies the defamation, silencing, erasure and ideological and political persecution of feminists for speaking the truth about queer doctrine and transgenderism. Historical feminists such as Lidia Falcónfeminist writers such as Lucía Etxebarría and feminist professionals such as Carola López Moya have undergone and are undergoing cancellation and institutional harassment which are not permissible in a state under the rule of law.
In order to make this seem acceptable, the neo-liberal patriarchy has for years injected its propaganda in young people with institutional, financial and media support. He infiltrated the feminist movement to neutralise it from within. It dehumanised and stigmatised feminists. In short, exploited the weakness of the left plunged into postmodern identity politics and is increasingly unable to understand all the political dimensions of the global market.
L'assault on universities began long ago and the current generations of students and a large number of teachers blindly reproduce dogmas and anti-democratic strategies. The corruption of the objectives and functions of the Equality Units and Observatories, which had been set up to support the promotion of women in higher education institutions, reveals the level of ideological penetration of neoliberal patriarchy through queer doctrine and transactivism.
At the DoFemCo Conference last November, horrific testimonies were given of lecturers in Spanish, British, Canadian, Argentinean and Brazilian universities subjected to unbearable harassment against the silence of their institutions, to the loss of academic appointments and dismissala surrender to the intellectual orthodoxy of an student body that prevents, for example, defining an adult human woman as 'woman' or condemning the sexual and reproductive exploitation of women.
The Spanish feminist movement, organised and represented by dozens of organisations from all over the country, strongly condemns this ideological and political persecution and demands that the academic and political authorities, private and state, put an immediate and unequivocal end to this situation, consistent with scientific reasoning and a declared commitment to democracy and equality policies.
We also ask that the damage caused to the image and academic integrity of Professor Juana Gallego be repaired in the institution to which they belong, and that the climate of plurality, personal respect and intellectual debate  essential for building and transmitting knowledge and for contributing to the improvement of society'.

To follow the text boycotting my person sent by the students of the master's course where I taught more or less the same subjects as Gallego -Philosophy and Ethics of Communication at the IUAV University of Venice. As can be seen, these are real photocopy texts, with the same charges formulated in the same language.

Following this letter IUAV invited me to resign, a request which I firmly rejected.

Dear Professor X,
and dear Professors Y and Z (who read us in copy),
I am forwarding this email on behalf of all of us students in the Master's programme in Communication Management and Cultural Policy.

We are puzzled by the appointment of Marina Terragni as the holder of the 'Philosophy and Ethics of Contemporary Information' course for the second module. In light of the reactionary and exclusionary positions expressed in many of his blog articles and public posts on its social pages, we say to each other opposed to this choice. We claim this opposition because we consider its positions not only far removed from ours, but more seriously offensive and irreconcilable with the project of IUAV and this master's degree. We need only mention the university's openness to careers with an 'alias identity', as opposed to theTerragni's opposition to 'self-id' and self-determination of trans people, but also unfounded criticism of queer theories, which we are happy to have included in the content of the master course. This choice threatens the integrity of a pathway explicitly linked to feminist, intersectional and queer discourses, e potentially challenges its classrooms as a safe space. We are prompted to say this first and foremost by Terragni's use of communication platforms, so central to this teaching.
We ask for explanations for this choice, with esteem and confidence in your judgement, but we support our position with equal conviction. We welcome your invitation to transformative thinking and practice, but this is not the direction in which we want the master to proceed.


Cordially,
the Master's Student Body 

Marina Terragni


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
You can send to: ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE BLU BRAMANTE
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
26 May 2022
Norwegian feminist faces 3 years in prison for saying a man cannot be a mother
Christine Ellington, WDI's Norway contact person, investigated by the police for hate crime against a certain Jentoft who says she is a 'lesbian'. And whom she denounced, with the support of Amnesty International. Today, calling oneself a woman is possible for everyone. Except for women
While Netflix is under transactivist attack for broadcasting actor Ricky Gervais' stand-up, which dared to make fun of 'women with penises', there is much less joking in Norway. Christina Ellington, a representative of WDI (Women's Declaration International) is being investigated by the police and faces 3 years in jail for tweeting that males cannot be lesbians and for saying on TV to a male Jentoft, who identifies as a lesbian woman: 'You are a man. You can't be [...]
Read now
24 May 2022
US Congress promotes a Women's Bill of Rights inspired by feminist texts
To be able to call themselves women, not to be reduced to 'menstruators' or 'holes in the front', to have their own reserved spaces: the American Republicans take on the resistance of feminism against woke progressivism and propose a law of historic significance. Women's associations, from WoLF to WDI, approve. But dividing them remains the issue of abortion, with the Supreme Court ruling in the home stretch.
While the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), America's largest civil rights association, is campaigning to argue that barring male sex offenders from women's prisons is discriminatory and unconstitutional, on 19 May, a group of Republican representatives in the US Congress, first signatory Debbie Lesko, introduced a resolution to introduce a Women's Bill of Rights, in order to legally define what a 'woman' is, recognise that women and [...]
Read now
17 May 2022
Milan introduces gender self-certification
All it will take is a 'solemn' declaration to be able to choose what sex you are -female, male or neither- without any medical acts, expert opinions or judgments, and to adopt the 'alias' identity in various municipal services, including electoral rolls. In fact self-id, a huge change introduced by a simple administrative act and without any public debate. But it is all to be assessed whether the law allows it
So in Milan, self-id was introduced: it means being able to decide whether you are male, female - or neither - in total freedom, without expert opinions, sentences, witnesses - as the national law provides for: nothing of the sort, a simple bureaucratic step and it's done. In Great Britain, after years of public debate, self-id was shelved: the overwhelming majority of the population was against it. In Milan, without any debate, as if citizenship did not exist, as if laws did not exist, and [...]
Read now
13 May 2022
Right, left, human, transhuman
The issue of 'rights' -from gender identity to the uterus for rent- is not complementary or on the sidelines, but outlines the horizon towards which we move. But the post-human perspective pursued by progressives is not unique and inescapable. The alternative exists: a female-rooted civilisation
By re-submitting the Zan bill in the Senate with very little chance of it passing -when instead other solutions, such as the Scalfarotto bill, would have ensured a law against homobitransfobia- PD secretary Letta has repeatedly stressed that the issue of rights is decisive for his party. The theme of rights, however, is always placed as complementary, on the sidelines of issues considered far more relevant: the war, certainly, economic issues, but also simply the electoral law. In truth, most of the game [...].
Read now
10 May 2022
Kathleen Stock: 5 tips to keep transactivist troublemakers quiet
The lecturer forced to resign for saying that biological sex exists explains how to deal with harassing transactivism: just like a mother dealing with a wayward child or rebellious teenager. An ironic guide to saving your life
Philosopher Kathleen Stock became known outside academic circles after she was forced to resign from her professorship at the University of Sussex with threats and defamation by transactivists for expressing critical views on gender identity (see here). While similar cases are happening all over the world, including Italy and Europe (see here and here), in Anglo-Saxon countries lecturers are organising themselves to fight against the censorship of gender-critical feminism. In the article we present Kathleen [...]
Read now
4 May 2022
Abortion in the USA: something doesn't add up
A "little hand" brings out in advance a Supreme Court ruling that would make the termination of pregnancy illegal. To whose advantage and why? With what consequences for the midterm elections, in which Biden was expected to lose? And what has gender-critical feminism, which some liberal observers want to blame, got to do with it?
A real political bombshell, thrown just a few months before the midterm elections, is the draft ruling of the US Supreme Court, which has fortunately leaked, that would make abortion illegal in the United States, overturning the historic Roe v. Wade ruling that made it legal in 1973. In the meantime, it is a draft; the final ruling is expected in June. It is also a question of who's 'little hand' it came from, and why. It could have been any of the conservative justices (Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito who would [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 29