UK: no to gender-neutral passports

Christie Elan-Cane, who defines herself as non-binary, lost her appeal to the Supreme Court asking to be transcribed in documents as gender X. While recognising the right to define oneself as gender-neutral in private life and relationships, the court ruled that the interest in defining sex in public documents was paramount.
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

The English Supreme Court ruling denying gender-neutral transcription in passports is particularly interesting because overrides the public interest overriding the interest of the person requesting to be transcribed as non-binary. In fact, it says that if in one's personal relationships one can ask to be treated and named as one sees fit - with the agreement of the interlocutors - then one should be treated as one's partner. in public life gender certainty is relevant and therefore preeminent.

An activist has lost his case in the Supreme Court challenging the government's refusal to issue gender-neutral passports.

Christie Elan-Cane (pictured) said the refusal violated human rights laws by not allowing the "X" option. But the court stated that the gender of the applicants is "a biographical detail that can be used to confirm their identity".

Christie Elan-Cane said the case would now go to the European Court of Human Rights.

The activist, who has been calling for the legal recognition of neutral identity for decades, said on Twitter that "the UK government and judiciary are on the wrong side of history'. and "this is not the end".

Gender-neutral passports are already issued by Argentina, Australia, the United States, Canada, Denmark, India, Malta, Nepal and the Netherlands. -in fact, in the Netherlands you cannot indicate gender X, but you can request to omit the sex from the documents, ed.- New Zealand and Pakistan, while Germany has introduced the intersex category -rare genetic condition that has nothing to do with transgender, ed.

The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed Christie Elan-Cane's appealThis came after the Ministry of the Interior had won an earlier ruling by the Court of Appeal.

Lord Reed, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, stated in the judgment that gender could be verified against birth, adoption or gender recognition certificates as part of confirming the identity of the applicant.

"It is the gender recognised for legal purposes and recorded in those documents that is relevant", he said.

He also stated that Christie Elan-Cane's interest in having an "X" passport is outweighed by other considerations, including "maintaining a consistent approach across the administration".

"There is no legislation in the UK that recognises a genderless category of individuals," he explained.

He also said that the legislation assumes that all people can be classified into two sexes or genders - "terms that have been used interchangeably".

At a hearing in July, Kate Gallafent QC, representing Christie Elan-Cane, told the court that genderless and non-binary persons are forced to make a false declaration in order to obtain a passport, which 'compromises the standards of honesty and integrity expected of such official procedures'.

But Lord Reed stated that While neutral identity may be central to Christie Elan-Cane's private life, the designation of an identity in a passport is not 'a particularly important aspect of the applicant's existence or identity'.

Sir James Eadie QC, representing Her Majesty's Passport Office -which is part of the Home Office- said it was "obviously problematic and highly undesirable" that only part of the government would recognise non-binary or gender identities.

He explained that this could result in a person being treated one sex or gender by the passport office and a different one by other parts of the administration.

original article here, translation by Laura De Barbieri

You can give us your contribution by CLICKING HERE

or by sending to

CULTURAL ASSOCIATION BLU BRAMANTE

OBLIGATORY REASON: FEMINIST POST

IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
You can send to: ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE BLU BRAMANTE
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
12 August 2022
Italian Society of Paediatrics: stopping puberty in dysphoric children does not cause permanent problems. But several studies prove otherwise
UK, Sweden, Finland, USA: much of the world is up in arms against puberty blockers that can irreversibly damage the health of girls and boys. The Tavistock clinic in London is closing down, a thousand families are preparing for a class action in defence of their daughters and sons who have not been properly treated, many American paediatricians are attacking their trade association which is pushing for the administration of these drugs. But for the Italian paediatricians' society these problems do not exist
According to the Italian Society of Paediatrics, the effects of puberty blockers used to treat girls and boys with gender dysphoria are perfectly REVERSIBLE: this means that if the girl/boy changes her mind about her intention to 'change sex' and suspends the 'therapy', her development will resume normally, without any definitive effects and/or health problems. This is not the case at all. The effects of puberty blocker therapy are by no means 'completely reversible', as has been demonstrated by several [...]
Read now
6 August 2022
California, transfusion of children
The American state proposes itself as a 'health' tourism destination for minors who are unable to access transition where they live. Exempting the parents and relieving the operators of any risk of litigation in the event of subsequent 'repentance'. Meanwhile in the UK, after the closure of the Tavistock, eyes are on a Scottish clinic where the experimental model (puberty blockers and surgery) continues to be applied
There is a real war going on in the United States over the ideology of gender identity and its promotion in schools. A 'culture war' pitting the elites, who fund and promote gender ideology, against the ordinary people who oppose it (see the Disney case here). While Biden from day one has made many legislative concessions to trans activism at the federal level, the Republicans have intercepted the discontent of the citizenry with various counter-legislation at the state level, such as [...]
Read now
29 July 2022
UK. Black week for the glittering trans-patriarchy: closed the Tavistock, gender clinic for children. And Allison Bailey wins in court: she was discriminated against for her gender critical views
The ideology of gender identity under attack in UK: NHS orders closure of paediatric transition clinic and points the way to psychological therapies. And Allison Bailey wins employment tribunal case backed by JK Rowling: employer ordered to compensate her for putting her 'under investigation' because of her gender critical views. At the suggestion of Stonewall, who comes out of it with her reputation in tatters
CLOSES TAVISTOCK, CHILDREN'S TRANSITION CLINIC: 'AFFIRMATIVE' APPROACH (DRUGS AND SURGERY) IS DANGEROUS FOR YOUNG PATIENTS The news is sensational: the British National Health Service (NHS) has ordered the closure of the Tavistock & Portman gender clinic for failing to ensure the safety of young patients, most of whom are girls (full article here). The clinic has been accused by several parties of hastily initiating many minors, most of them suffering from spectrum disorders [...].
Read now
28 July 2022
Argentina: stop neutral language in schools
E' was the first country to introduce gender self-identification. Ten years later it is among the first to ban neutral language in schools as it is 'not even that inclusive: it creates a barrier for children with learning difficulties'
In 2012, Argentina was the first country in the world to introduce self-id or gender self-identification into its legal system. Ten years later, it is one of the first countries to ban neutral language in schools. As taught by the mothers of radical feminism and difference thinking, the neutral is a red herring that actually brings the male point of view back to the centre. If the illusion of the neutral is less noticeable in the English language, it is immediately [...]
Read now
20 July 2022
Where is the Casa delle Donne in Rome going?
'The House we are all' reads the beautiful slogan of the historic enclave in Trastevere. But in that space, which is public and should be open, the#039;agibility is only transfeminist. And after the uncritical support for the Zan ddl -to stop feminicides-, the yes to the 'uterus for rent' and to 'sex work', now also the hymn to male ultra-bodies in women sports: maybe it is time for a reflection
The International House of Women in Rome agrees with the University of Pennsylvania's proposal to name Lia Thomas 'Woman Athlete of the Year'. Lia Thomas, of whom we have spoken several times here, is the famous swimmer who has repeatedly beaten her opponents competing in the women's categories, but who has at least had the merit of finally exploding the issue of male ultra-athletes in women's sports. The post shared by the International House of Women, a confusing little treatise on intersectional feminism, [...].
Read now
6 July 2022
Maya Forstater, fired for saying sex cannot be changed, wins in court: it was discrimination
Decisive for gender critical feminism around the world was the victory of Maya, a researcher who lost her job over a tweet in which she wrote that biological sex is immutable and that women have rights based on sex. Britain reaffirms the right to criticise gender identity: threats and accusations of transphobia are illegitimate. "A'further proof" says Forstater "that the wind is changing". The final ruling of the labour court also ordered the company that did not renew the contract of the researcher, co-founder of Sex Matters, to pay compensation. A triumph across the board
A year ago, June 2021, Feminist Post published an article on the case of Maya Forstater, the British researcher whose employment contract was not renewed by her employer for expressing critical views on the concept of gender identity and reaffirming the importance of women's gender-based rights. The article ended by reminding readers that Maya's case was not yet over and, although the appeal ruling of the [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 38