Unlike their Italian counterparts from the PD and the left who stand for free gender identity, the Spanish progressives break with the PSOE's transactivist policies in defence of women and children. In their manifesto the excellent arguments against what, if passed, could be the worst transactivist law in the world
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

Breaking with his party, the PSOE, and sending a signal to European left-wing women, who are generally aligned in defence of transactivist right-wingism, the Federación de Mujeres Progresistas launches a courageous manifesto against Ley Trans desired by the governing majority in Spain (PSOE and Podemos) and being approved by an emergency procedure, without any real parliamentary debate or broad public discussion. The initiative also stems from in response to the resounding break between historic Spanish feminism -united in the cartel Contraborrado- and the largest party of the left to enter into dialogue with the People's Party.

Also in Italy, feminism had to fight with its bare hands to break the silence whereby the Zan ddl was about to surreptitiously introduce free gender identity without discussion into our legal system. We did it, and the bill did not become law. The danger has been averted for now but not definitively. The interests at stake are colossal.

In 2023 Spain will go to the vote: the left-wing majority is risking and the Ley Trans could be the final blow to the PSOE: this is the framework in which the manifesto of the Mujeres Progresistas was conceived.

We bring it up again because enumerates many good arguments against transactivist claims (on some of these topics we maintain some reservations). And perhaps could inspire an act of courage in their PD and Italian left-wing counterparts who have put up an insurmountable wall in the face of the excellent arguments put forward by radical feminism against free gender identity and in particular against the pharmacological and surgical manipulation of girls and children with behaviours gender nonconforming.

Horribly the brand new guidelines of theWorld Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) lower the age limits for puberty blockers, hormones or surgery to 9 years in order to enlarge the market for the benefit of Big Pharma and maximise the transfactor's profits, advising health professionals to 'challenging' parents who do not support the medical transition: We will talk about it soon.


After the autonomous 'trans laws' already approved and in force, the Council of Ministers approved a draft of a state 'trans law', which was transmitted to the Cortes (29-6-22) providing for the emergency procedure. We oppose this bill (as well as the 'trans laws' already passed, which should be repealed) for the following reasons:


The bill defines 'trans persons' as those 'whose sexual identity does not correspond to the sex assigned at birth' (Art. 3, J). In turn, 'sexual identity' is defined as 'the internal, individual experience of sex as each person feels and self-defines it' (Art. 3, h). Such vague and subjective 'definitions' prevent the object of the right from being defined and its specific requirements from being met.

Faced with people expressing discomfort about their sex/gender, the draft law imposes the so-called 'affirmative treatment' (consisting of acceptance of the patient's self-diagnosis claiming to have another gender identity). Any other diagnosis can be considered to be covered by the 'methods, programmes and aversion, conversion or counterconditioning therapies, in any form whatsoever, intended to change the sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of persons even if they have the consent of the person concerned. person'. These interventions are prohibited (Art. 17) and involve penalties of up to EUR 150,000 (Arts. 75, 4 and 76.3).

Accordingly, these people lose their right to:

A. a psychological assessment (they will go directly to endocrinology or family medicine), which is necessary to assess the presence and intensity of discomfort (dysphoria) and detect concomitant comorbidities (anxiety, depression, autism spectrum disorders, or abuse situations, etc.) and a differential diagnosis  with other similar situations

B. psychological support that addresses the causes of discomfortThese may have to do with various issues, including: lack of self-esteem, conflicts with the assigned gender role, difficulties experienced in relationships, the search for sexual orientation, etc. Furthermore, by imposing this 'affirmative model' the draft law prevents us from analysing and addressing increasingly frequent phenomena, such as:

a. 'sudden onset gender dysphoria', often associated with the social contagion (groups of friends declaring themselves trans at the same time) and the increase (4.000% in ten years) minors, mostly females, who declare themselves trans.

b. detransitions (people who, after hormone treatment and/or irreversible surgery, want to go back).


The 'affirmative model' imposed by the bill induces children, adolescents and young people who feel uneasy about their sex/gender to make a 'social transit' (change of name, clothing, etc.), to which it may follow hormonal intervention and frequently surgical treatments: amputations of breasts, genitals, 'construction' of non-functional vaginas or penises with skin from other parts of the body, etc., in search of a biologically impossible 'sex change'.

These treatments and interventions can have (especially if performed in adolescence) serious and irreversible consequences: infertility, anorgasmia and others that are still little known, due to the fact that studies on children and adolescents have only a few years of follow-up.

It is to be expected that in a few years time there will be (in fact, it has already begun) a wave of quereland against the professionals who advised, permitted or performed such treatments.

Aware of these dangers, other countries around us are restricting children's access to this care (Finland, Sweden) and allowing the investigation of thousands of cases of 'trans' minors to examine possible medical liability (United Kingdom).



The bill is not aimed at transgender people, but at the entire population. If approved, anyone can register at the civil registry office and change their legal gender without any obligation (Art. 38).

In this way, turns the legal category 'sex' into something arbitrary, empty, which means nothing. It introduces a new category that will take precedence over that of sex: 'sexual identity'., which it defines as "internal and individual experience of sex as each person feels and defines himself, which may or may not correspond to the sex assigned at birth' (Art. 3 hr). The entire legal structure is thus built on a subjective, non-scientific, indefinable and indemonstrable concept.


By allowing any man to be legally considered a woman without any obligation, the bill jeopardises safe spaces and rights (such as equal shares) conquered by women. The door opens in the presence of men, even sexual assaulters, in toilets, locker rooms, sports teams, reception centres, prisons, etc, hitherto reserved for women, as is already the case in other countries.

It cannot be argued that 'there are very few cases' and 'only those who need it will use the law', since we do not know how many 'trans people' there are (it is too undefined a concept), nor can we predict how many people will use the law and for what purposes (legal sex change will be a right of anyone, without motivation or requirements, which makes impossible to distinguish between 'real trannies' and 'frauds'). Moreover, it only takes a small number of individuals to alter the principles of justice, fair play, security, etc., which affect all women, as well as the very concept of 'woman'.


Gender equality policies will be impossible if the 'woman' category become independent of biological sex and is redefined to include males.

This would prevent, if the law is passed, the make visible, measure and analyse inequality between men and women. For instance, if male rapists identify themselves as women, before or after the crime, and are counted as such in the statistics, these will no longer adequately describe the reality, making it difficult to act accordingly. Another example: how to understand the wage gap if there is not even a word to define the category of people who can conceive, give birth and breastfeed?


The bill (arts. 72 to 77) provides for very severe penalties (fines of up to EUR 150,000, closure of establishments, disqualification of subsidies...) and of an administrative nature (with no guarantee of legal proceedings) to conduct described in broad and vague terms, such as the 'refusal to serve or assist those who have suffered any kind of discrimination based on sexual orientation and identity, gender expression or sexual characteristics' (Art. 75, c) or the aforementioned 'aversion, conversion or counterconditioning programmes or therapies' (Art. 75, d).


Although queer theory is diverse and complex, what is reaching society is a schematic and simplified version , which we shall call "transgenderist ideology". It is this ideology that we want to criticise, as it is accepted by public opinion and acquires normative force.


Creating the acronym 'LGTBIQ'.transactivism:

A. in an interested manner confuses very different concepts: orientation sexual (lesbian, gay and bisexual), self-identification of genre ('trans people') with very different conditions (simple name change, transvestism, surgery... ) and genetic anomalieshe (intersexuality).

B. fa abusively one with one's cause and the causeactually very different (but much more popular), non-discrimination of homosexuals and bisexuals.

C. appropriates feminist struggles in order to distort and deactivate them.


Feminism uses the concept of 'gender' to analyse the power relations between men and women and refer to a social structure that subordinates women and the set of sexist roles and stereotypes that serve to entrench and justify this subordination. For feminism, 'gender' is something negative,  which must be fought to achieve equality.

Transgenderism attributes to the term 'gender' a completely different and positive meaning: an individual, purely subjective 'identity' that is not questioned or fought over but celebrated on the sole condition that it can be chosen independently of biological sex. In this way, transgenderism attacks the waterline of the feminist struggle.


Transgenderism denies the biological definition of the sexes, claiming that being female or male is a mysterious innate 'identity'. "Woman is whoever feels like a woman." But this is a circular and empty definition (If we cannot define 'woman', how does it feel to those who claim to feel like women?).

Basically what transgenderism does is reaffirm old sexist stereotypes: if a girl likes football, prefers to wear trousers, is competitive.... is really a boy, and if a boy is sweet, likes dolls and dresses up as a fairy it is because he is a girl.

Transgenderist ideology pushes children whose behaviour does not conform to gender roles, and who may be homosexual, to identify themselves as persons of the opposite sex (hence, heterosexuals). 

It therefore provides an (homophobic) 'explanation' and 'solution' to homosexuality.


Being female or male entails certain bodily experiences, different by sex, that we subjectively process in ways dictated by society and culture.

At the same time, biological sex (such as race or social class, but more clearly and invariably in the case of gender)  places each individual in a certain place within a social structure. Being a woman leads to consequences that range - depending on the country and the era - from not being born (selective abortion), to undergoing genital mutilation or being sold, as a girl, into marriage with an older man, to being trafficked into prostitution, to having to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term, to earning less than a man for the same work, or to performing compulsory and free domestic and care work.

If 'woman' becomes the name of a group that has no objective definition (it cannot be delimited in biological terms because that would be an 'exclusive' definition), which can include men with no other motivation than their will, which ultimately means nothing or even disappears (replaced by euphemisms such as 'pregnant person', 'menstruators', 'people with wombs', etc.), How can we conceptually unite the different forms of discrimination that are common to all women? How to visualise the historical and geographical continuity of these experiences, their common denominator? How can we be a political subject?


Denying biology, stating that subjective perception has priority over material reality and is able to transform it without limit, transgenderism is a first step along the line of transhumanism. Thus progressing towards a society in which privileged people, those with access to economic, medical, cultural.., can -or will- try to fulfil body-related desires by using come storage for spare parts, the bodies of people, particularly poor women (through 'subrogation' for example).


Feminism has embraced the idea of diversity in a sense of 'intersectionality', i.e. emphasising the inclusion and defence of women who suffer multiple oppression or discrimination, within the principle of equality. Transgenderism forgets equality in favour of 'diversity' which, in practice, means:

A. amalgamating very different problems, that would require specific research and measures: Roma, disabled, migrants or lesbians do not have the same problems.

B. circumvent the demands of half the population for equality, women (a controversial political objective with an economic cost), offering instead the defence of 'different identities', often uncritically (without questioning patriarchal ideas and sexual hierarchies), purely aesthetic and reaffirming stereotypes.


Assuming transgenderist ideology, Much of the left is relegating the material and collective conditions of existence to oblivion, and stating that what matters, what really exists, are subjective and individual perceptions. Instead of working to improve women's living conditions on a collective level, it offers them the illusory solution of choosing to be men. The struggle becomes individual and individualistic, against the collective struggles that have advanced social and equal rights for decades.

Similarly, this left defends desires instead of rights, forgetting that desires exercised by one privileged group at the expense of another that is in a worse situation: the desire for paid sex at the expense of the rights of prostituted women, that of 'intentional parents' at the expense of the rights of the woman who gestates and gives birth for them, that of those who undertake a 'sex change' at the expense of the cancellation of the fight for women's rights .

the original text can be found at here

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
5 June 2023
Los Angeles: queer clubs on families
Fathers and mothers peacefully demonstrating against the Pride event held at their children's school - kindergarten and primary schools - were physically assaulted with fists and baseball bats by Lgbtq+ and Antifa activists. In California you can no longer decide anything about your children's education
The pictures you see come from Los Angeles, where last Friday a group of parents protested against an LGBTQ Pride event organised at school for kindergarten and primary schools children. A group of left-wing extremists arrived to disrupt the event and attacked the parents with baseball bats and fists, starting a violent brawl that ended only after the police intervened. On the eve of the 'PRIDE assembly' organised at the Saticoy [...]
Read now
4 June 2023
CIAMS, STOP SURROGACY NOW, FINRRAGE, LA JAPAN COALITION and other associations. And together with them such eminent figures of international feminism as SYLVIANE AGACINSKI, GENA COREA and PHYLLIS CHESLER. Who together with us are asking the Italian parliamentarians to approve the law that will pass the Chamber of Deputies on 19 June.
Rete per l'Inviolabilità del Corpo Femminile (Network for the Inviolability of the Female Body), Radfem Italia, and FINAARGIT (International Feminist Network Against Artificial Reproduction, Gender Ideology and Transhumanism) have always shared the goal of the universal abolition of the surrogate motherhood. Together we support the bill on surrogacy that will be debated in the Chamber of Deputies next 19 June, which extends the punishability of the practice even if it is carried out in a foreign country and which is a decisive step forward in the direction of universal abolition, offering -if approved- a model for other legislations [...].
Read now
30 May 2023
Spain: woke sex also among the reasons for the end of Podemos
Ley Trans. Only Yes is Yes' law that reduced penalties for sex offenders. And now also a Manifesto for Sex Education for All* that jeopardises the safety of girls and boys. The spirit is always the same: a queer sexuality promoted by outgoing minister Irene Montero. Which, however, voters and electors apparently do not like. An analysis by lecturer Juana Gallego, feminist affected by the cancel culture
In yesterday's local elections in Spain, the left lost disastrously - as in Italy, for that matter. In particular, there was the stinging defeat of Podemos, which in many regions almost went extinct. In the analyses of the Spanish vote, perhaps not enough emphasis is given to two manifesto-laws of Podemos, and in particular of the transfeminist minister Irene Montero: the 'Only Yes is Yes' law, which reduced penalties for sexual crimes, and the Ley Trans, which [...]
Read now
22 May 2023
Transgender: the victory of Puer Aeternus
An evolution of the unisex who struggled against gender stereotypes, the 'gender' phenomenon among adolescents expresses the attempt to escape the biological debt-obligation and the need to feel disengaged from stepmotherly nature. But the transgender person is by no means his or her own creator: if anything, he or she is subservient to a totipotent 'spirit' that enslaves the mind and psyche. And the gay movement that advocates puerile simulation fails to see that it is precisely homosexual identity that comes off worst
Transgender ideology goes beyond the transsexual claim of the construction of sex by subtraction or addition of something from a matrix, because it challenges the very existence of the male and the female, and especially the latter, making the female gender a product of educational norms, DIY craftsmanship, beauty shop, chemical laboratory, surgical table. Both appeal to the 'truth' of the omnipotent creation of the sexes, destitute of actual reality. Young women in particular are unfortunately fertile ground [...].
Read now
15 May 2023
Jama: when men give birth
In an incredible, recently published study, the American Medical Association's journal, one of the most important in the field, tries to give scientific backing to the idea that childbirth is not just a female experience. Because if it were exclusive, it would also be exclusionary. An operation on language in collision with reality
As we know, there are words that can no longer be used, especially in international scientific documents and studies. At the top of the list of tabooed words are all the terms that have to do with female difference understood as the exclusive possibility of giving birth to human beings, and thus: 'woman' -if biologically understood and not open to define persons not born women-, 'mother' and 'maternal', 'breast', with reference to breast-feeding, and so on. The operation on language aims to qualify [...].
Read now
13 May 2023
Legislation against violence against women should talk about sex and not 'gender identity': open letter to the European Parliament
Violence against women will not be combated if the texts of laws and treaties do not clearly refer to sex and not 'gender'. We join feminist and gender critical groups in an appeal to MEPs who will vote on the Commission's anti-violence proposal: write clearly in the text that women and girls are the female sex and leave no room for gender ideology
We, too, signed the letter to the European Commission on combating violence against women and domestic abuse drafted by WORIADS, a coalition of gender-critical citizens whose aim is to inform and raise awareness of the dangers of gender identity in the European institutions. The letter demands that European regulations on violence against women clearly recognise the category of biological sex. Below is the full text that will be sent to the members of the European Parliament who will vote on the [...].
Read now
1 2 3 ... 49