New England Journal of Medicine: abortion ban is a health catastrophe

The prestigious magazine raises the alarm: it will be mainly poor and black women who will pay the price of the Supreme Court ruling, driven back into abortion with serious health risks. Even the morning-after pill and even the IUD could be banned and prosecuted as abortifacient means
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

The decision of the US Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organisation represents an extraordinary reversal (...) Yet it was not unexpected. In the long and painful prelude to the decision, many states severely restricted access to reproductive healthcare. The fig leaf covering these restrictions was that induced abortion was a dangerous procedure that required stricter regulation to protect the health of women who sought such assistance. Facts disprove this false rhetoric. 

The latest data available in the United States from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and from the National Centre for Health Statistics indicate that the maternal mortality due to legal abortion is 0.41 per 100,000 procedures, compared to the overall maternal mortality rate of 23.8 per 100,000 live births

Experience around the world has shown that limiting access to legal abortion care does not substantially reduce the number of procedures, but it does drastically reduce the number of procedures safe resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. It is likely that millions of women in states without abortion protection also access to drug-induced abortions is also denied. It may be difficult for many Americans in 2022 to fully understand how complicated, stressful and expensive, if not unattainable, their most private and intimate decisions will become now that Roe was hit. 

A recent article in the New York Times recounted the experiences of women, now in their 60s and 70s, who have sought abortions before Roe . They describe humiliating circumstances, dangerous procedures performed literally in back alleys and the deep shame and stigma they suffered. The common complications of illegal procedures included injuries to the reproductive tract requiring surgery, induction of infections resulting in infertility, systemic infections, iorgan failure and death. Now we seem destined to relearn those lessons at the cost of human lives.

Without federal protection, recent state laws restricting or eliminating the right to abortion will deny Americans' reproductive autonomy and create an Orwellian dystopia. Examples are the Oklahoma law enacted on 25 May 2022, which declares that life begins at fertilisation, and the Texas bill, effective 1 September 2021, which authorises third parties to file civil lawsuits and collect damages against persons who aid or abet abortions. Defendants in such lawsuits will bear their own legal costs, while plaintiffs are indemnified against countersuits for filing baseless actions. 

The use of postcoital contraception, hormonal contraceptives or the placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) could be equated with abortion and prosecuted; some jurisdictions (e.g. Mississippi) are already considering such actions. After conception, about 14 days elapse before chorionic gonadotropin reaches detectable levels in the maternal blood. Approximately 30% of recognised pregnancies result in miscarriages. Therefore, in some jurisdictions women may be prosecuted for terminating a pregnancy using postcoital contraception, despite a 98% probability that their actions did not cause an abortion, but there is no way to prove or disprove that they were pregnant (...)

For almost 50 years, Americans have lived under the protection of Roe v. Wade, free to determine their own reproductive destiny. At a time when dozens of other countries around the world are codifying reproductive decision-making protections for their citizens, we are turning back the clock to take these rights away from our citizens. As has been pointed out by others, the most privileged members of US society will always be able to circumvent restrictive laws and find abortion assistance in jurisdictions that allow it. The changes currently proposed in the laws will be more burdensome and unfair for low-income people and people of colour who are less able to overcome the obstacles placed in their paths. These changes inevitably will exacerbate the already vast inequalities in wealth and health.

Abolishing long-standing legal protections, the annulment of Roe v. Wade by the US Supreme Court hurts American families, putting their health, safety, finances and future at risk. In light of these foreseeable consequences, the editors of the New England Journal of Medicine strongly condemn the decision of the US Supreme Court.

translation by Marina Terragni (the full article here).

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
30 May 2023
Spain: woke sex also among the reasons for the end of Podemos
Ley Trans. Only Yes is Yes' law that reduced penalties for sex offenders. And now also a Manifesto for Sex Education for All* that jeopardises the safety of girls and boys. The spirit is always the same: a queer sexuality promoted by outgoing minister Irene Montero. Which, however, voters and electors apparently do not like. An analysis by lecturer Juana Gallego, feminist affected by the cancel culture
In yesterday's local elections in Spain, the left lost disastrously - as in Italy, for that matter. In particular, there was the stinging defeat of Podemos, which in many regions almost went extinct. In the analyses of the Spanish vote, perhaps not enough emphasis is given to two manifesto-laws of Podemos, and in particular of the transfeminist minister Irene Montero: the 'Only Yes is Yes' law, which reduced penalties for sexual crimes, and the Ley Trans, which [...]
Read now
26 May 2023
This time it is: in the skin of children
Against the ruling of the Court of Cassation, which prevents the full transcription of birth certificates of children born from surrogacy by allowing only the biological parent to be named and indicating stepchild adoption for his or her partner, some male couples in Milan are undertaking a new form of resistance: not even registering the biological parent - or both or neither - leaving the child in an administrative limbo in which, in this case, he or she would be deprived of the most elementary rights, from paediatrician to school
After the Prefecture of Milan, in application of a ruling by the Court of Cassation, blocked the transcription of the full birth certificates of children born on the initiative of same-sex couples - indicating that only the biological parent should be transcribed and the stepchild adoption, i.e. adoption in special cases, which is perfectly legitimate, should be the only way forward - the municipality of Milan is experiencing this, according to the report by Roberta Osculati, PD vice-president of the City Council: same-sex couples [...].
Read now
15 May 2023
Jama: when men give birth
In an incredible, recently published study, the American Medical Association's journal, one of the most important in the field, tries to give scientific backing to the idea that childbirth is not just a female experience. Because if it were exclusive, it would also be exclusionary. An operation on language in collision with reality
As we know, there are words that can no longer be used, especially in international scientific documents and studies. At the top of the list of tabooed words are all the terms that have to do with female difference understood as the exclusive possibility of giving birth to human beings, and thus: 'woman' -if biologically understood and not open to define persons not born women-, 'mother' and 'maternal', 'breast', with reference to breast-feeding, and so on. The operation on language aims to qualify [...].
Read now
13 May 2023
Legislation against violence against women should talk about sex and not 'gender identity': open letter to the European Parliament
Violence against women will not be combated if the texts of laws and treaties do not clearly refer to sex and not 'gender'. We join feminist and gender critical groups in an appeal to MEPs who will vote on the Commission's anti-violence proposal: write clearly in the text that women and girls are the female sex and leave no room for gender ideology
We, too, signed the letter to the European Commission on combating violence against women and domestic abuse drafted by WORIADS, a coalition of gender-critical citizens whose aim is to inform and raise awareness of the dangers of gender identity in the European institutions. The letter demands that European regulations on violence against women clearly recognise the category of biological sex. Below is the full text that will be sent to the members of the European Parliament who will vote on the [...].
Read now
11 May 2023
The Istanbul Convention belongs to women! The Right does not obstruct Europe's ratification
By abstaining from yesterday's vote, preliminary to the European accession to the most important treaty against violence against women, the MEPs of the Lega and Fratelli d'Italia gave in to the pressure of the Pro Vita, who read that document as anti-family and pro-gender (the same concerns expressed by Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan). But Italy has already acceded to the Convention and apparently this is not the government's orientation. And Lgbtq claims have nothing to do with it. Women between two misogynist fires: religious extremism and queer instrumentalisation
Yesterday, a resolution was passed in Europe calling on the EU to accede to the Istanbul Convention (2011), the most important international treaty -legally binding- against violence against women and domestic violence. Italy has already ratified the Convention in 2013, while 6 European countries (Bulgaria, Czechia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia) have not yet done so. Yesterday's vote is preliminary to the accession of the entire EU to the Convention. Incredibly, the MEPs of Fratelli d'Italia and the Lega abstained from the vote. [...]
Read now
8 May 2023
The Bundestag is preparing to vote on a proposal modelled on the horrible Spanish law that allows free choice of gender even for minors with a simple self-declaration at the registry office (in addition to the possibility of changing one's mind several times). Also in the front line here is a left-wing woman counterpart of Irene Montero: the Green Minister for Women's Affairs Lisa Paus. But the opinion of the Federal Constitutional Court, which expresses many doubts about the deletion of the category 'sex', will be needed.
What is a woman? The answer that Justice Minister Buschmann (FDP, Liberal Democratic Party) and Women's Affairs Minister Lisa Paus (Greens, pictured) give to this question is: a woman is anyone who claims to be a woman. This is the core of the 'bill on self-determination in gender registration' that both ministries have now presented. With a simple declaration at the registry office, everyone will in future be able to change their sex: from male to [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 40