Matic Report: Europe pushes for gender identity

Overriding the sovereignty of member states, the European Parliament is producing indications on sexual and reproductive health: self-id, male motherhood, uterus for rent, assisted fertilisation for all, hormones for children, uterus for rent. The hand of Big Tech on our lives, for an anthropological mutation of the human being
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

Under the theme women's healthto the The European Parliament's 23 June plenary session on the state of sexual and reproductive health and rights voted on the Matic Report.

Women's healthbut the words "women" and "sex" have been replaced with genre.

The Matic Report produces Directions to be followed by the Member Statesindications that represent precise lines and constitute a 'toolbox'.interference with the jurisdiction of individual states over the management of national health systems or national health policy choices.

The report of 23 June includes the concept of gender identity: "calls on Member States [...] to amend accordingly laws, policies and practices that exclude certain groups from access to maternity, pregnancy and childbirth related care, including removing discriminatory legal and policy restrictions that apply on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity".

The report also mentions "reproductive rights"proposing to overcome the obstacles that cause "limited access to fertility treatments" and extending medically assisted reproduction: "calls on Member States to ensure that all persons of reproductive age have access to fertility treatment, regardless [...] of gender identity or sexual orientation; [...] calls on Member States to adopt a holistic, inclusive, non-discriminatory and rights-based approach to fertility, including measures to prevent infertility and ensure equal access to services for all persons of reproductive age, and to make medically assisted reproduction available and accessible in Europe'. We further read: "transgender men and non-binary people may be pregnant and should, in such cases, benefit from pregnancy and childbirth assistance measures, without being discriminated against on the basis of their gender identity".

There is also a part on the"comprehensive sexual education [...] for the benefit of young people"in primary and secondary schools.

Among the main issues in the report are the "right to abortion" to be included among human rights, by their nature inviolable. He explains Luisa Muraro at Abortion. For us feminists it is not a right: "We started from the fundamental principle of female freedom: a woman cannot be forced to become a mother, motherhood begins with a yes. But we tended to emphasise that abortion is not a right. A right always has a positive content. Abortion, on the other hand, is a refusal, a fallback, a necessity. The woman who does not want to become a mother undergoes a violent intervention on her body to eradicate this beginning of life. We thought, and still think, that if we make abortion a right, we are authorising the irresponsibility of men.".

From minority position of two female MEPs: this report

- Outside its scope addressing issues such as health, sex education and reproduction, as well as abortion and education, which are legislative competences of the Member States. 

- The report treats abortion as an alleged human right that does not figure in international law, which violates the Universal Declaration of Human Rights itself and the main binding treaties, also contradicting the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union.

- The report also identifies a ideological manipulation of human rights, totwenty universal and immutable nature, through aninternational influence that erodes the sovereignty of countries, compromising their respective legislation.

- The report threatens the freedom, equality and dignity of women, going against their very nature by dissociating identity from biological sex.

- By means of a gender-focused ideological programme, the report presents an isolated and victimised woman, decoupling health from life and prioritising subjective well-being that encourages women to forego their fertility and motherhood.

From this report emerges a strong direction taken at European and international level: gender identity, gender-neutral ideology in schools, artificial reproduction.

In several countries we are seeing Proposals for legislation including gender identity and self-certification of the self and widening access to medically assisted procreation (MAP) techniques. 
In Spain the Ley Trans extended gender self-certification to children under 12: parental consent is needed until 16, but if between 14 and 16 the child is in conflict with the parents you can ask for parental authority to be taken away from them and for the child to be placed in the care of a guardian. In fact, this denies parents the possibility of opposing the transition, the boy and girl are effectively taken away from their parental authority by a techno-medical system that will force its way into their lives. assessing their discomfort and difficulties and establishing the start of the transition path.

La Ley Trans also reopens access to lesbian or single women to PMA techniques under the National Health Service (which was excluded seven years ago), including for the first time also the "trans people with gestational capacity'.

La France with its new bioethics law also includes theaccess to PMA techniques for all women, double gamete donation, in vitro fertilisation with three parentsthe creation of artificial gametes and chimeric human-animal embryos that can be implanted in animals and of genetically modified human embryos for research purposes, thus paving the way for genetically modified children. *

In Italy a representative of Rainbow Families and Sinistra Italiana during a recent demonstration in Milan in support of Ddl Zan was clear: "the real objectives are self-certification of gender and the right to the uterus for rent [...] The Zan law is a forward-looking law that looks to the future". The next step is "law 40, which leaves behind single women who cannot access assisted fertilisation. We want the revision of the now antiquated law 164/82 on transitional paths (i.e. obtaining free gender self-certification). We want a season of rights in which we talk about PMA and GPA, and the recognition of the sons and daughters of rainbow families. The Zan Bill is only the beginning". (see here)

And even at the Milan Pride a representative of Rainbow Families asked for the registration in the birth certificate of the non-biological parent and 'free access to assisted reproduction techniques for all and sundry'.

We are witnessing, from many quarters, a push to erase the material dimension of bodies, sexual difference, to erase women, occupy their space and expropriate them from procreation.
Steps are being taken to stop puberty in children at an increasingly early ageto penetrate thegender-neutral ideology in schools with unicorns and neutral pronouns. 
There is a push to legalise the uterus for rent, extend PMA to all,
to erase the mother, the one from whom we come into the world, stating that one is born of two fathers or two mothers, and to artificialise procreation with transhuman pregnancies and artificial wombs.
The LGBTQ rights agenda has become a powerful force, its supporters are at the top of the media, academia and especially Big Business, Big Philanthropy and Big Tech. Women and their bodies in all this become a terrain of appropriation and confrontation.

But on this ground nothing can be surrendered, what is at stake is the anthropological and ontological mutation of the human being.

Transhumanist and eugenicist technocrats need to erase the biological sex of birth from infancy in order to produce a 'new sex'.neutral humanity, no longer sexual, without differences between men and women. To close the circle on control and management of the living they need to appropriating the dimension of procreation and birth. Artificial reproduction technologies, the extension of PMA, embryo selection and modification, the male motherhoodcancellation of the mother are moving in this direction, to constitute a "new".neutral and infinitely modifiable humanity.

Silvia Guerini



Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
You can send to: ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE BLU BRAMANTE
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
5 July 2022
Women attacked from left and right: the ash on the head of the New York Times
As the organ of the liberals and woke culture, the great US newspaper has been undertaking a vigorous change of course for a few months now, admitting its own excesses and the misogyny of the new progressive course committed to wiping out women. While waiting for the self-critical wind to blow in Europe too
by Pamela Paul Perhaps it makes sense that women - complacent and pleasant-looking creatures, selfless and just as pretty - were the ones who finally brought our polarised country together. Because the far right and the far left have found the one thing they can agree on: women don't matter. The position of the right is best known, the movement has been aggressively dedicated for decades to depriving women of basic rights. Thanks also to two judges [...]
Read now
5 July 2022
Mayor Beppe Sala's 'gift' to Pride
From now on, in Milan, the birth certificates of children of 'homogenous couples' will be automatically registered, including those born from surrogacy. Although the law and subsequent rulings firmly condemn the practice and point the way to 'adoption' for the 'intended' parent. But the registry office is the responsibility of the State, not of local administrations. And the Milanese have never been asked about it: all the critical aspects of a unilateral and very glamorous decision that could also present profiles of unconstitutionality
'We have restarted the recognition of children born in Italy by homogenous couples': the words with which Mayor Beppe Sala announced his personal 'gift' to Pride initially caused some confusion. In fact, children born 'in Italy' on the initiative of - and not 'by' - same-sex couples are only the children of women united with other women. The children of male couples are born in Canada, California or other procreative tourism destinations, but not in Italy [...].
Read now
29 June 2022
School ends, forced withdrawals of children begin again
Despite a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Cassation defining the forced removal of minors as 'outside the rule of law', this morning in the province of Lodi an 11-year-old boy was snatched from his mother, who was forcibly and deceptively detained while her son was taken. Here is how the events unfolded in the account of a witness
This morning in the province of Lodi, in Casalmaiocco, an 11-year-old boy, Gioele, was forcibly snatched and suddenly and traumatically removed from the mother with whom he was living. Here are the facts as told by a MaternaMente activist present at the time: 'Deborah and her son had been summoned for a meeting by the social services this morning. The meeting took place online and the SS used reassuring tones. The mother then went to the municipality to [...].
Read now
27 June 2022
New England Journal of Medicine: abortion ban is a health catastrophe
The prestigious magazine raises the alarm: it will be mainly poor and black women who will pay the price of the Supreme Court ruling, driven back into abortion with serious health risks. Even the morning-after pill and even the IUD could be banned and prosecuted as abortifacient means
The US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization represents an extraordinary reversal (...) Yet it was not unexpected. In the long and painful prelude to the decision, many states severely restricted access to reproductive health care. The fig leaf covering these restrictions was that induced abortion was a dangerous procedure that required stricter regulation to protect the health of women seeking such care. The facts belie this false rhetoric. The latest data available in the United States [...]
Read now
27 June 2022
How they won the war against Roe
Failure to turn Roe v. Wade into law was the capital mistake of the American left, starting with Barack Obama. Abortion was an entirely secondary issue for trans-politics-absorbed liberals, who have spent years erasing the word 'woman' by renaming it as 'menstruator' and 'uterus carrier', rather than addressing women's rights
How did American pro-lifers win the war against Roe v. Wade? In the article of which we present you with extended excerpts, journalist Sarah Ditum explains how the Democrats' neglect and arrogance unwittingly helped set women's rights in America back 50 years. "When did it become certain that American women's right to abortion would be revoked? The Supreme Court's ruling that "Roe was terribly wrong from the start" leaked almost two months ago, [...]
Read now
25 June 2022
US midterm elections: will women be decisive after the abortion ruling?
What will American women do now? Will they win solidarity among themselves, as they have always won in Italy over abortion? Or will they settle into opposing sides in a quasi-civil war? The November vote will be the first test. Women could form the strong core of that moderate front that cannot find political expression in the US
What will American women do now? Will they win solidarity among themselves, as they have always won in Italy with regard to abortion, holding together Catholics and agnostics, left-wing and right-wing women in defence of law 194/78? Or will they settle into opposing camps, to put it mildly, the quasi-civil war underway in the United States? The midterm elections in November, with the Republicans as favourites, will be the first test: how many female voters, albeit [...].
Read now
1 2 3 ... 40