Maya Forstater, fired for saying sex cannot be changed, wins in court: it was discrimination

Decisive for gender critical feminism around the world was the victory of Maya, a researcher who lost her job over a tweet in which she wrote that biological sex is immutable and that women have rights based on sex. Britain reaffirms the right to criticise gender identity: threats and accusations of transphobia are illegitimate. "A'further proof" says Forstater "that the wind is changing". The final ruling of the labour court also ordered the company that did not renew the contract of the researcher, co-founder of Sex Matters, to pay compensation. A triumph across the board
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

A year ago, June 2021, Feminist Post published a article on case of Maya Forstater, the British researcher whose employment contract was not renewed by her employer for expressing critical views on the concept of gender identity and reaffirming the importance of women's gender-based rights. The article closed by reminding readers that Maya's case was not yet over, and although the labour court's appeal ruling had established that Maya's convictions were protected in principle by the Equal Opportunities Act, It remained to be established whether Maya had been the victim of discrimination based on her personal beliefs.

We are happy to announce that today the labour court agreed with Maya Forstater and recognised her treatment by her employer as discriminatory treatment under the law. A judgement will follow to determine the amount of compensation.

Below is the press release issued by Maya Forstater for further details on the judgment and its grounds.


6 July 2022. Maya Forstater, who had sued his employer, the Center for Global Development [Centre for Global Development, or CGD] for discrimination based on personal beliefs, won the case on the grounds expressed by the court that the employer's conduct amounted to unlawful discrimination, justification based on the protection of personal beliefs by English law.

This ruling follows the previous judgment of the Labour Court of June 2021, in which the court ruled, with binding effect, that Maya Forstater's personal convictions, so-called 'gender critical' (in essence criticism of the importance of gender identity in the context of women's rights) were protected by theEquality Act, i.e. equal opportunities legislation. The ruling did not end the litigation, which continued in the labour court to determine whether Maya Forstater had been the victim of discrimination based on her personal beliefs.

The court unanimously determined that the following actions of the employer CGD constituted discrimination based on personal beliefs:
1. La retraction of the offer of the employment contract;
2. The non-renewal of the fellowship;
3. The removal of the profile from the CGD website.

The court also ruled that Maya Forstater's tweets and comments, which were the motivation for Forstater's treatment by her employer, were legitimate expressions of her protected personal beliefs. Consequently, the negative reaction of the CGD is in this case as unlawful discrimination.

Maya Forstater, licenziata per aver detto che il sesso non si può cambiare, vince in tribunale: fu discriminazione
JK Rowling's support for Maya Forstater

Among the comments by Maya Forstater at the basis of the litigation include but are not limited to:
- 'A man's inner conviction that he is a woman has no material basis'.
- The description of Pips Bunce, a man who identifies as a woman only a few days a week, as a 'part-time transvestite'.
- The comparison between self-identified trans women and Rachel Dolezal [the white American woman who identifies as African American].
- "The places and situations where women and girls are sexually abused and harassed are part of the 'normality' in women's lives"; (said) in the context of a debate on the consequences for women's safety of recognising trans women as women. This comment was not, as argued by counsel for the CGD, 'an exaggeration' but simply 'an unexceptionable finding in the context of the debate ... [that] did not constitute an objectively unreasonable remark'.
- The description of gender self-identification (self-id) as 'a feeling conceived within the mind' did not equate gender identification with a mental illness and 'was no more than an expression of Forstater's personal beliefs about gender identity'.

The court also recognised Forstater's right to criticise those who held an opposing position to his, arguing that this right to criticise was legitimate. Specifically, the court recognised that if the expression of a personal belief is considered offensive, the offence is not sufficient to deprive that belief of the protection of the law. Expressions included the description of the other party's opinions as 'stupid, dangerous or unfair' and the statement that the access of male individuals to women-only spaces resulted in "increased risks and discomfort" for women.

Maya Forstater, researcher specialising in public policy[1] e founder of an organisation dedicated to human rights, Sex Matters[2]welcomed the court's ruling.

"My case concerns all those who believe in the importance of truth and freedom of expression.

"We are all free to believe what we want. This does not imply that we are free to force others to follow our beliefs, to deprive those who disagree of the right to express themselves or to force a person to deny reality.

"Human beings do not have the ability to change sex. This statement is not a hate crime; on the contrary, it is essential to allow every human being to be treated in a way that guarantees their safety and dignity. It should not require courage to state this truth, and one should not risk one's job for making this statement.

"I am pleased that the court has allowed me to make public the treatment I suffered at the Center for Global Development. The court ruled that I was a victim of discrimination based on my belief that biological sex is a real fact and of fundamental importance, and that this belief is shared by the majority of the population in this country (UK)]. I hope employers take note of this ruling.

"I want to thank my family, who have shared this experience with me these past three years, and my lawyers: Ben Cooper QC, Anya Palmer, and Peter Daly. But above all I want to thank the thousands of women and men who have shown me their support, and in particular JK Rowling, who stood by me in the darkest moments.

"Knowing that my case has helped other people find the courage to voice their dissent in the face of unfair and discriminatory practices in their employment has made it easier to overcome the difficulties of the past three years. Tall those who are fighting such battles - and there are many - have my solidarity and support.

"I also want to thank all those fantastic organisations fighting to protect women's rights. Thanks to them, the world will become a fairer and safer place for women and girls. These organisations have courageously taken over the place that much better-funded organisations, such as the CGD, have cowardly abandoned.

"The CGD's unfair treatment of me, and the prejudice shown towards those who believe that sex is a material reality, have changed my life. If my employer had not terminated my employment, I would never have contributed to the foundation of Sex Matters. I would never have the opportunity to be part of this incredible movement in my country fighting to reaffirm the importance of gender-based rights.

Women have had enough of being sidelined in language, law, public policy and public spaces. This ruling is further proof that the wind is changing."

Introduction and translation by Alessandra Asteriti

[1] Maya Forstater has worked for many years in the field of international development, specialising in taxation and sustainable development. Maya was a visiting fellow at the European headquarters of the Center for Global Development, a Washington-based think-tank, between 2017 and 2019, when he lost his job in March 2019 after publicly speaking out against changes to the Gender Transition Act (Gender Recognition Act of 2004), changes later abandoned by the UK government.

[2] Maya Forstater is Executive Director of Sex Matters, a non-profit organisation co-founded by Forstater in 2021 to promote gender-based women's rights. Sex Matters promotes greater legislative clarity on gender-based rights, with regard to women's services, schools, sports and freedom of expression.

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
15 February 2024
How to convince progressives to give up gender
Terrified of transactivists and worried about sounding 'right-wing', left-wingers support the transition of minors even in the absence of studies showing that 'affirmative therapy' works and promotes the well-being of gender non-conforming girls and boys. "But everyone has a right to evidence-based medicine," argue some liberals determined to "break the spell". And they start DIAG -Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender- to convince democrats in the US and around the world that continuing on this path is wrong and dangerous. For children and for the left. An article by Bernard Lane
A new movement of US Democrats wants to find out how to break the spell of gender ideology and bring the party back to the liberal values of science and reason. Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender (DIAG) launched a project yesterday on X Space (Twitter) to commission research on how to more effectively reach out to left-wing voters who believe that science is now in favour of 'gender-affirming' medicalisation of gender non-conforming youth. "The only way to end this [...]
Read now
6 February 2024
New York Times: Strong doubts about hormones for children with gender dysphoria
The world's leading woke newspaper has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, starting with the indecent treatment of JK Rowling. Today the paper changes course and in a very long article criticises the 'affirmative therapy' (puberty blockers, hormones and surgery) for trans minors, giving a voice to some hitherto censored and ostracised detransitioners. Because by now even many Democratic voters have strong doubts. And there is a risk of losing many readers: "get woke, go broke".
For years, the New York Times has been the world's leading woke newspaper and has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, jubilating critical voices. The treatment of JK Rowling is exemplary. In 2022 a very violent subscription campaign invited people to imagine Harry Potter without its creator: the ultimate in cancel culture (see here) A misogynistic and aggressive gesture - the initiative turned out to be a boomerang and many female subscribers threatened to cancel -. A few months ago The Daily published [...].
Read now
22 January 2024
Men IntintA and other wonders
The health of 'Marco', a trans FtM who is five months pregnant with testosterone, and that of her baby are the least of the problems. What matters to the liberal press talking about an 'anthropological revolution' is whether 'Marco' is to be called mother or father. But only a woman can give birth even if at the registry office her name is male. In this nothing has changed since the dawn of time. In the meantime, the trans front is losing ground: in one year, the number of members of WPATH, the largest transgender health organisation, has fallen by 60 per cent.
La Repubblica online headlines with a triple somersault about the 'young man who got pregnant': pregnant is not dared even at the transphilic GEDI group. The story is that of 'Marco', a girl undergoing testosterone therapy to look more like a man: beard, graver voice -not to 'become male' because sex cannot be changed and every single cell will remain damned XX-. 'Marco' had retained his uterus and ovaries and following a hetero sexual relationship (a [...]
Read now
11 January 2024
Child rapists: shock report in UK
In Great Britain, 18 rapes a day are committed by minors on their peers: in 2022 these cases numbered 15,000, almost always by very young males. A British police report shows how free access to violent pornography online is normalising criminal sexual behaviour in England and all other Western countries
For years, we have been reporting on the psychological and material damage produced on an entire generation by free access to violent online pornography, consumed by boys and girls from the age of 7 but also much earlier: gang rapes committed by minors are just the tip of the iceberg of this dramatic phenomenon, which has now been analysed and quantified by a study by the British police. On this topic you can find previous articles here, here, here and here. We were almost only [...]
Read now
7 January 2024
New Hampshire: No more 'sex change' surgery on minors
The US state has passed a bill banning surgeons from performing operations on under-18 year olds such as the removal of ovaries and breasts for females and penises and testicles for males. The bill states that these operations violate the patient's 'informed consent' and points out that studies have not shown a decrease in the suicide risk of minors after the operations. On the contrary: the danger increases
New Hampshire is preparing to ban under-18s from undergoing sex-change operations. Last Thursday, the New Hampshire House of Representatives passed a bill to this effect, also with the help of some Democratic members. House Bill 619 prohibits doctors from performing 'any genital gender reassignment surgery', i.e. the removal of the uterus, ovaries and breasts in the case of women; testicles and penis for men, to anyone in the [...]
Read now
31 December 2023
Puberty should perhaps be stopped at ALL: Transhuman drift of the World Health Organisation
In a veritable Christmas blitz, the WHO announces that it wants to draw up new gender-affirming guidelines and sets up a panel made up of three-quarters transactivists in favour of medicalising children. Preferably all of them, even those who do not suffer from dysphoria. Because choosing what sex you are must become a universal right. An international petition calls for a halt to the initiative
A few days before Christmas, the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced that it will develop new guidelines on the 'health of trans and gender diverse people', with a focus on access to hormones and surgery (what it calls 'gender-inclusive care.) ') and legal recognition of gender self-identification (self id). The WHO also announced that it has formed a group to develop the guidelines. This expert group includes many World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) apparatchiks, including [...]
Read now
1 2 3 58