Victory for Maya, for JK Rowling and for all of us!

Belief in the immutability of biological sex is an opinion protected by the European Convention on Human Rights. Maya Forstater and all gender critical feminism are entitled to freely express their thoughts. This ruling is a great victory for justice and women's rights.
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

The Court of Appeal of the Employment Tribunal in England issued its judgment in the Forstater case on 10 June today. The Court ruled that belief in the immutability of biological sex is a form of opinion protected by Article 9(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

What had happened, and what will happen now to Maya Forstater?

Let's take a step back. In 2019, Maya, a researcher at the Center for Global Development in London, expressed in a series of tweets some criticism of transgender ideology, and specifically the idea that self-identification is sufficient for legal sex change, and that trans women are women, through and through. For expressing criticism and concerns, colleagues in the centre's US office complained of alleged transphobia.. Maya's employment contract was not renewedas originally planned and Maya initiated litigation in the labour court.

In a preliminary ruling of December 2019 to determine whether so-called 'gender critical' views were protected by the European Convention and the UK Equality Act, Judge James Tayler ruled that such views were 'incompatible with human dignity and human rights'. and branded these views as absolutist. In essence, the judge concluded that gender-critical views must be excluded from the protection of the law in the same way as Nazism, anti-Semitism or racism. Specifically, the judge determined that Forstater's opinions did not meet criterion V of the so-called Grainger test, derived from the Grainger case in the Labour Court. Criterion V states that, in order to qualify for the protection of the law, opinions must be worthy of respect in a democratic society and respect human dignity and the rights of others.

The repercussions of the ruling were considerable. JKR Rowling expressed her support for Maya in a tweet, which triggered a huge negative reaction.

In a general climate where daring to criticise gender ideology can result in death threats or rape, many women expressed solidarity with Maya on social media. The decision to appeal has become a symbol of many women's rebellion against this ideology, and especially against the injunction not to discuss any aspect of it. Since 2019, the number of women who have openly criticised this ideology has increased substantially. The #WomenWontWheesht campaign (women will not shut up) started by a feminist in Scotland has been successful not only outside Scotland, but even outside Great Britain. There have also been many obstacles. Marion Millar herself, who started the campaign, was charged with transphobia and homophobia and now faces a sentence of up to two years.

This brings us to June this year. The case on appeal was aimed solely at determining whether the employment tribunal had erred in law in finding that gender critical views were not protected. In a paragraph that establishes with exemplary clarity what the error consists of, the Court of Appeal held that

[...] the Applicant's views do not even remotely approach views on the lines of Nazism or totalitarianismwhich require the application of Article 17 [of the European Convention, prohibition of abuse of rights]. This is sufficient to establish that criterion V of the Grainger case is satisfied. The Appellant's views are certainly capable of causing offence or being considered abominable; however, the evidence before the Tribunal demonstrates that thehe Applicant sincerely believed that 'there is no incompatibility between recognising that human beings are unable to change sex and protecting the human rights of those who identify as transgender [...] In my opinion, such a statement is not tantamount to expressing an intention to destroy the rights of transgender individuals. It is aopinion that may, in certain circumstances, offend a transgender individual, but that potential does not constitute a valid reason for depriving that opinion of the protection of the law.

What the Court ruled on 10 June is essential to ensure the protection of gender-critical views in the workplace in general. What the Court did not determine, nor should it have, is the substantive issue of whether in expressing her views, Maya engaged in conduct in violation of the Equality Act with respect to discrimination against and abuse of transgender individuals. The case now returns to the Employment Tribunal for a determination of the merits. In the meantime, however many women breathed a sigh of relief. Believing that sex is an objective fact and that women have rights according to their sex is not the same as being a bigot or a Nazi.

Today we celebrate this victory for justice and women's rights. Tomorrow, the struggle begins again. 

Alessandra Asteriti

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
21 March 2023
'We were wrong': pioneer of puberty blockers admits damage
Susan Bradley, a Canadian psychiatrist who founded a clinic for 'dysphoric' minors in the 1970s and an authority in this field today states that the switch from psychological therapy to drugs was a big mistake. Because their effects are severe and not reversible, because those treatments are 'authoritarian' and experimental. And because in 9 out of 10 cases children's dysphoria is only temporary and masks other disorders.
In an interview with the Daily Caller News Foundation, Dr Susan Bradley, a Canadian psychiatrist and a pioneer in the treatment of gender dysphoria in children, spoke out against the popular model of affirming children's transgender identities and treating them with puberty-blocking drugs, a practice she had participated in in the past. Bradley had opened a paediatric clinic in 1975 for children suffering from gender dysphoria, a profound sense of unease concerning the [...]
Read now
3 March 2023
Women and the left: a toxic love
Betrayed, abused, humiliated. And finally supplanted by self-identified neo-women who are far more attractive and functional than the 'old' women by birth. Yet many among us cannot break away from the progressives who show in every way that they do not consider them. The same dynamics of a sick relationship
All loves are born and die, and when they end there is always the one who suffers the most, sometimes only one party, the one who loved sincerely, the other perhaps not, perhaps he was lying. And we women believed in love with the left side seriously, with all our hearts: naively we thought we were the favourites, we believed in promises, even those that clearly appeared false. Carla Lonzi already reminded us half a century ago that the left had sold us 'to the hypothetical Revolution', and even overseas the [...]
Read now
27 February 2023
PD primaries: transfeminist Elly Schlein wins
The young leader launches her OPA and wins it. By making the Democratic Party a woke formation, in line with western progressivism: di-rightism, free gender identity, uterus for rent, sex work. A challenge reminiscent of what is happening in Spain where radical feminism has divorced the Left
To begin with, congratulations to Elly Schlein and best wishes for her new post. Then the facts, as I see them. Elly Schlein's victory was a takeover of the PD: the vote in the gazebo, for the first time different from the one in the circles - also a historical novelty - shows that Schlein has mobilised the radical left to the limits of antagonism, as well as the 5 stars. She said it years ago: Occupy PD. Now she has done it. That she is supported by a major part [...].
Read now
15 February 2023
UK: Inquiry book published on the Tavistock case, clinic that 'cured' autistic children by transitioning them
BBC journalist Hanna Barnes struggled hard to find a publisher: the censorship we all know. But she finally made it. And now her sensational essay on the scandal of the Tavistock, a clinic for the transition of minors closed by the British National Health Service: puberty blockers casually prescribed to preadolescents with autism, trauma or psychological disorders. For years some staff tried to raise the alarm, but were intimidated and silenced. This is an entirely political issue, because the health of children is at stake. Thousands throughout the West lured by hammering trans-propaganda
Hanna Barnes is a BBC journalist. After conducting a thorough investigation of the Tavistock clinic in London, a centre for the gender transition of minors, and having discovered the wickedness of that service, she decided to turn it into a book. But it was not at all easy to find a publisher willing to publish it. Not because Barnes's work was not documented and rigorous, but because no publishing house could withstand the likely accusation of transphobia that the publication of the [...]
Read now
11 February 2023
The trans-industry on the assault of children
The huge business - drugs and surgery - attracts more and more investors. To widen the audience they work on social networks and in schools where they teach that Zeus was non-binary, celebrate every transition and threaten those who resist, as a 14-year-old English girl tells the Daily Mail. While in the US, the former manager of a gender clinic for minors spills the beans: what goes on in those places is appalling. They must be stopped. Two impressive testimonies
The complex and articulated system to which we call transactivism (read business: thanks to Jennifer Bilek for her meticulous investigative work) has long been working to create an ever-widening audience of drug and surgery users to transition: for surgery alone, turnover in 2022 was $623 million (Global Market Insight, an agency that directs investors to the best opportunities), a figure expected to increase exponentially in the [...].
Read now
1 February 2023
Holland: if you block the development of girls and boys you push them to become trans
The protocol - pausing puberty to allow minors to 'choose' their sex - they invented. But even the Dutch now admit that in 9 out of 10 cases blockers no longer give time to 'decide' but are the start of the transition. A self-fulfilling prophecy. And that the effects of these drugs are by no means reversible
Amsterdam University Clinic UMC, a pioneer in the use of puberty blockers, has admitted that children taking these drugs may find themselves locked into increased medicalisation. The admission comes following the publication earlier this month of a new retrospective study examining 20 years of hormonal interventions known as the 'Dutch protocol', conducted on 1,766 children and adolescents between 1972 and 2018 at the famed Amsterdam clinic and published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine. But [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 36