Victory for Maya, for JK Rowling and for all of us!

Belief in the immutability of biological sex is an opinion protected by the European Convention on Human Rights. Maya Forstater and all gender critical feminism are entitled to freely express their thoughts. This ruling is a great victory for justice and women's rights.
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

The Court of Appeal of the Employment Tribunal in England issued its judgment in the Forstater case on 10 June today. The Court ruled that belief in the immutability of biological sex is a form of opinion protected by Article 9(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

What had happened, and what will happen now to Maya Forstater?

Let's take a step back. In 2019, Maya, a researcher at the Center for Global Development in London, expressed in a series of tweets some criticism of transgender ideology, and specifically the idea that self-identification is sufficient for legal sex change, and that trans women are women, through and through. For expressing criticism and concerns, colleagues in the centre's US office complained of alleged transphobia.. Maya's employment contract was not renewedas originally planned and Maya initiated litigation in the labour court.

In a preliminary ruling of December 2019 to determine whether so-called 'gender critical' views were protected by the European Convention and the UK Equality Act, Judge James Tayler ruled that such views were 'incompatible with human dignity and human rights'. and branded these views as absolutist. In essence, the judge concluded that gender-critical views must be excluded from the protection of the law in the same way as Nazism, anti-Semitism or racism. Specifically, the judge determined that Forstater's opinions did not meet criterion V of the so-called Grainger test, derived from the Grainger case in the Labour Court. Criterion V states that, in order to qualify for the protection of the law, opinions must be worthy of respect in a democratic society and respect human dignity and the rights of others.

The repercussions of the ruling were considerable. JKR Rowling expressed her support for Maya in a tweet, which triggered a huge negative reaction.

In a general climate where daring to criticise gender ideology can result in death threats or rape, many women expressed solidarity with Maya on social media. The decision to appeal has become a symbol of many women's rebellion against this ideology, and especially against the injunction not to discuss any aspect of it. Since 2019, the number of women who have openly criticised this ideology has increased substantially. The #WomenWontWheesht campaign (women will not shut up) started by a feminist in Scotland has been successful not only outside Scotland, but even outside Great Britain. There have also been many obstacles. Marion Millar herself, who started the campaign, was charged with transphobia and homophobia and now faces a sentence of up to two years.

This brings us to June this year. The case on appeal was aimed solely at determining whether the employment tribunal had erred in law in finding that gender critical views were not protected. In a paragraph that establishes with exemplary clarity what the error consists of, the Court of Appeal held that

[...] the Applicant's views do not even remotely approach views on the lines of Nazism or totalitarianismwhich require the application of Article 17 [of the European Convention, prohibition of abuse of rights]. This is sufficient to establish that criterion V of the Grainger case is satisfied. The Appellant's views are certainly capable of causing offence or being considered abominable; however, the evidence before the Tribunal demonstrates that thehe Applicant sincerely believed that 'there is no incompatibility between recognising that human beings are unable to change sex and protecting the human rights of those who identify as transgender [...] In my opinion, such a statement is not tantamount to expressing an intention to destroy the rights of transgender individuals. It is aopinion that may, in certain circumstances, offend a transgender individual, but that potential does not constitute a valid reason for depriving that opinion of the protection of the law.

What the Court ruled on 10 June is essential to ensure the protection of gender-critical views in the workplace in general. What the Court did not determine, nor should it have, is the substantive issue of whether in expressing her views, Maya engaged in conduct in violation of the Equality Act with respect to discrimination against and abuse of transgender individuals. The case now returns to the Employment Tribunal for a determination of the merits. In the meantime, however many women breathed a sigh of relief. Believing that sex is an objective fact and that women have rights according to their sex is not the same as being a bigot or a Nazi.

Today we celebrate this victory for justice and women's rights. Tomorrow, the struggle begins again. 

Alessandra Asteriti

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
1 February 2023
Holland: if you block the development of girls and boys you push them to become trans
The protocol - pausing puberty to allow minors to 'choose' their sex - they invented. But even the Dutch now admit that in 9 out of 10 cases blockers no longer give time to 'decide' but are the start of the transition. A self-fulfilling prophecy. And that the effects of these drugs are by no means reversible
Amsterdam University Clinic UMC, a pioneer in the use of puberty blockers, has admitted that children taking these drugs may find themselves locked into increased medicalisation. The admission comes following the publication earlier this month of a new retrospective study examining 20 years of hormonal interventions known as the 'Dutch protocol', conducted on 1,766 children and adolescents between 1972 and 2018 at the famed Amsterdam clinic and published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine. But [...]
Read now
27 January 2023
Transgender' children: it's social contagion. Even the largest trans association admits it
Tik Tok, Youtube and others: the president of WPATH, the world association for trans health, forced to admit that influencers play a large part in the epidemic of transitions among minors, a phenomenon denied by Western progressives who brand every alarm as transphobia. But they do not stop pushing for medicalisation and early surgery
The Honourable Alessandro Zan, first signatory of the infamous bill on gender identity, which ended up in the knighthouse, had denied the dizzying increase in cases of transition of girls and boys, calling the news a 'dangerous statement'. In 2021 there were already numerous statistics indicating the extent of the problem, but apparently Zan was not aware of it - which is unacceptable - or pretended not to know, or more likely ideologically believed that the mere fact of posing the question should be considered proof [...].
Read now
24 January 2023
Sex and gender: JK Rowling's essay
In her text, the writer explains in detail the reasons why she felt the need to address the trans issue, defying the violence of activists. A manifesto-writer for gender critical feminism translated into Italian by Alessandra Asteriti
Attacking JK Rowling can now also be a business. The latest initiative is that of a young Canadian imbecile art book creator who has decided to de-rowling Harry Potter by publishing a special edition of the saga on the cover of which the author's name disappears: $170 per copy for a despicable abuse of power. Let him keep all the copies in stock. Back to the serious stuff: in June 2020 JK Rowling published an essay on her website detailing her position [...].
Read now
22 January 2023
Femelliste, a gender critical 'sister' platform is born in France
Harassed, insulted, mocked, threatened: French feminists have collected and catalogued the attacks transactivists have suffered for years. And they have set up an information and training site against the dictatorship of transgender ideology
The name of the site is a play on words that cannot be translated into Italian. The site's creators inform that it has already been used by animal feminists such as Posie Parker, Nicole Roelens and the Boucherie Abolition collective. It would make one think of anti-specism, it is actually more and in some respects a little different. 'Femelle' in French means the female animal (for the human one, the same word as woman, femme, is used). Since they fight for sexual rights [...]
Read now
14 January 2023
UK: health service backs down on 'transgender maternity' services after midwives revolt
Fighting is needed: in Great Britain midwives and nurses are rebelling against the announced opening of courses and wards dedicated to the pregnancy and birth of 'trans and non-binary' people. And the NHS stops the initiative. Meanwhile, in the USA there is talk of uterus transplants between living people: donor women for the benefit of men who wish to have 'female physiological experiences'. The old patriarchal dream: to take the place of women. Today acted out by neo-patriarchs T
Fighting serves. The revolt of midwives and nurses has foiled the English National Health Service's (NHS) plan to organise dedicated 'transgender maternity' services. On 16 December, an advertisement had appeared to recruit staff to manage the training of 'trans and non-binary people giving birth' in 40 NHS maternity services, an announcement that provoked an immediate reaction from midwives. A group of around 300 nurses, midwives and psychologists wrote an open letter to Lizzie [...]
Read now
8 January 2023
Holland also puts the brakes on 'trans children'
The 2006 study on which the so-called 'Dutch protocol' exported worldwide is based - the administration of puberty blockers to minors with gender non-conforming behaviour - was financed by the pharmaceutical company that produces the blockers, and has been discredited several times. As in the UK, Sweden, Finland, even in that country they are now calling for a stop to these 'therapies' that cause serious damage to health.
The treatment of children with gender dysphoria with puberty blockers is called the 'Dutch protocol'. And it is based on a single study from 2006 that introduced the concept of 'sex change for transgender children' and was allegedly financed by Ferring Pharmaceuticals, the company that markets tryptorelin, the drug with which the natural development of girls and boys is stopped. This was revealed in a report by journalist Jan Kuitenbrouwer and sociologist Peter Vasterman recently published in the NRC Handelsblad, [...].
Read now
1 2 3 ... 35