Turkey withdraws from the Istanbul Convention against male violence. For women, a huge blow

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

Turkey abandons the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violenceknown as Istanbul Convention and ratified for the first time (2011) in that country.

A huge blow for Turkish towns: almost every day in 2020 a woman died at the hands of a mannot counting the 170 suspicious deaths. Same pace in the first 65 days of 2021, around 70 feminicides. According to the World Health Organisation at least 40% of Turkish women are victims of partner violence compared to a European average of 25%. Turkey also holds the record of women journalists in prison. Misogynistic violence in Turkey is therefore a major issue.

The abandonment of the Convention, which has been signed by 34 European nations and is an indispensable tool in the fight against male violence, was announced with a decree-gulp of the President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan welcomed by the Conservative government, which believes that the dangerous the treaty for having introduced the "principle of 'gender' equality, but also by promoting homosexuality.introducing non-discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation"(Reuters).

For the ruling party (Akp) the Convention It would damage family unity and encourage divorce, as well as include references that can be exploited by the LGBT community. According to the Associated Press note, those attacking the Convention claim that "The treaty promotes homosexuality through the use of categories such as 'gender', 'sexual orientation' and 'gender identity'. that pose a threat to Turkish families'..

In truth The Istanbul Convention has nothing to do with the concept of gender identity as it is understood today in LGBT claims, or 'free choice of gender irrespective of birth sex' (self-id). Also in the Italian discussion on Zan law The Convention has been referred to in order to defend the concept of 'gender identity': but this interpretation is totally forced.

Article 4 of the Convention states that "The implementation of the provisions (...) shall be ensured without any discrimination on the grounds of sex, gender (...) sexual orientation, sexual orientation, sexual orientation or sexual orientation.gender identity". But in 2011, when the treaty text was drafted, Gender identity' referred to women's freedom from gender stereotypes, that is, the non-obligation to conform one's behaviour to the roles assigned to traditional femininity, and not to queer claims.

The meaning of the Istanbul Convention cannot therefore be misunderstood in any way. In every passage of the text 'gender' is understood as 'female gender' and is always associated with women, beyond doubt. Right from the preamble it states that "the achievement of thegender equality de jure and de facto is a key element in preventing the violence against women"; we talk about the "structural nature of violence against women, as it is gender-based". Article 3(d) reads "the expression '.gender-based violence against women' means any violence directed against a woman as such". And so on (the whole text can be found here).

Gender identity as it is understood today (self-id) therefore has nothing to do with the Istanbul Convention, which cannot be an instrument of the gender politics and basis for LGBT claims.

Forcing the Convention in this sense harms women.

The Convention belongs to women. And the price of Turkey's exit will be paid by women.

Here are the feminist demonstrations of yesterday

Marina Terragni

Update, 22 March: As you can see, President Erdogan himself explains his decision to abandon the treaty - a decision that remains intolerable in any case and that will worsen the condition of women in Turkey - with the instrumentalisation of the Istanbul Convention by the LGBT+. The forced and opportunistic interpretation of the word gender as 'free gender identity' offered Erdogan the pretext to shelve the convention presumably with the consent of at least part of the population. This has done serious harm to women, for whom the convention was intended.

Only Feminist Post immediately proposed this reading of the facts.

Turkey, Istanbul Convention manipulated by gay community´.

(ANSA) - ROME, 22 MAR - "As is well known, Turkey was the first signatory of the Istanbul Convention, demonstrating a strong commitment to combating all forms of violence and protecting the status of women in society. Initially, the Istanbul Convention aimed to promote the strengthening of women's rights. then it was manipulated by a sector that is trying to normalise homosexuality, incompatible with Turkey's social and family values. The decision to withdraw from the Turkey contract is based on these reasons". This was stated in a statement by the Ankara Presidency, after the unilateral withdrawal from the Council of Europe document against gender-based violence.

"Turkey is not the only country with serious concerns about the Istanbul Convention. Six EU members (Bulgaria, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia) have not ratified the Istanbul Convention. Also Poland has taken steps to withdraw from the Convention, citing the Attempt by homosexual groups to impose their ideas on gender on society as a whole.. The decision of the Republic of Turkey to withdraw from the Istanbul Convention does not in any way mean that it is giving up protecting women. Turkey, even if it withdraws from the Convention, will never give up the fight against domestic violence."The Ankara note continues.

"Our President Recep Tayyip Erdogan strongly reiterates the fact that Turkey will continue to safeguard the safety and rights of all women and underlines the fact that combating violence against women will be a priority on the government's agenda with the zero-tolerance policy," the statement added, stressing that "Turkey will take further measures to improve the effectiveness of existing measures against domestic violence and violence against women as part of the human rights action plan announced in early March."(ANSA). 

YLL-AMB 22-MAR-21 17:29 NNNN


Feminist Post is produced solely through voluntary work and has no funding.

If you think our work is useful for your life, thank you if you can support us. Even the smallest contribution is precious! Thank you!

Send to ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE BLU BRAMANTE

CAUSE COMPULSORY: FEMINIST POST

IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
25 February 2024
The 'milk' of men
The English National Health Service ensures that the milk produced by a male body -stimulated with ad hoc drug therapy- is as good for the newborn as that of its mother, who is wiped out. Minimising the risks to the child's health largely offset by the ideological and symbolic benefits. It is the transhuman, my beauties!
Men's 'milk' is a perfect example of what we call transhuman. Women's milk, on the other hand, is human, all too human, it is the perfect model of the enduring human, and therefore natural breastfeeding should be degraded, mocked, stigmatised as something to be ashamed of and kept hidden. In fact, it is even a useless and unethical act. On the contrary, promoting and magnifying male 'breastfeeding' shows plastically the way forward. According to the prestigious journal Pediatrics, organ of the American Academy of Pediatrics, it is 'risky' to define [...]
Read now
15 February 2024
How to convince progressives to give up gender
Terrified of transactivists and worried about sounding 'right-wing', left-wingers support the transition of minors even in the absence of studies showing that 'affirmative therapy' works and promotes the well-being of gender non-conforming girls and boys. "But everyone has a right to evidence-based medicine," argue some liberals determined to "break the spell". And they start DIAG -Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender- to convince democrats in the US and around the world that continuing on this path is wrong and dangerous. For children and for the left. An article by Bernard Lane
A new movement of US Democrats wants to find out how to break the spell of gender ideology and bring the party back to the liberal values of science and reason. Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender (DIAG) launched a project yesterday on X Space (Twitter) to commission research on how to more effectively reach out to left-wing voters who believe that science is now in favour of 'gender-affirming' medicalisation of gender non-conforming youth. "The only way to end this [...]
Read now
6 February 2024
New York Times: Strong doubts about hormones for children with gender dysphoria
The world's leading woke newspaper has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, starting with the indecent treatment of JK Rowling. Today the paper changes course and in a very long article criticises the 'affirmative therapy' (puberty blockers, hormones and surgery) for trans minors, giving a voice to some hitherto censored and ostracised detransitioners. Because by now even many Democratic voters have strong doubts. And there is a risk of losing many readers: "get woke, go broke".
For years, the New York Times has been the world's leading woke newspaper and has always unhesitatingly supported transactivist demands, jubilating critical voices. The treatment of JK Rowling is exemplary. In 2022 a very violent subscription campaign invited people to imagine Harry Potter without its creator: the ultimate in cancel culture (see here) A misogynistic and aggressive gesture - the initiative turned out to be a boomerang and many female subscribers threatened to cancel -. A few months ago The Daily published [...].
Read now
22 January 2024
Men IntintA and other wonders
The health of 'Marco', a trans FtM who is five months pregnant with testosterone, and that of her baby are the least of the problems. What matters to the liberal press talking about an 'anthropological revolution' is whether 'Marco' is to be called mother or father. But only a woman can give birth even if at the registry office her name is male. In this nothing has changed since the dawn of time. In the meantime, the trans front is losing ground: in one year, the number of members of WPATH, the largest transgender health organisation, has fallen by 60 per cent.
La Repubblica online headlines with a triple somersault about the 'young man who got pregnant': pregnant is not dared even at the transphilic GEDI group. The story is that of 'Marco', a girl undergoing testosterone therapy to look more like a man: beard, graver voice -not to 'become male' because sex cannot be changed and every single cell will remain damned XX-. 'Marco' had retained his uterus and ovaries and following a hetero sexual relationship (a [...]
Read now
11 January 2024
Child rapists: shock report in UK
In Great Britain, 18 rapes a day are committed by minors on their peers: in 2022 these cases numbered 15,000, almost always by very young males. A British police report shows how free access to violent pornography online is normalising criminal sexual behaviour in England and all other Western countries
For years, we have been reporting on the psychological and material damage produced on an entire generation by free access to violent online pornography, consumed by boys and girls from the age of 7 but also much earlier: gang rapes committed by minors are just the tip of the iceberg of this dramatic phenomenon, which has now been analysed and quantified by a study by the British police. On this topic you can find previous articles here, here, here and here. We were almost only [...]
Read now
7 January 2024
New Hampshire: No more 'sex change' surgery on minors
The US state has passed a bill banning surgeons from performing operations on under-18 year olds such as the removal of ovaries and breasts for females and penises and testicles for males. The bill states that these operations violate the patient's 'informed consent' and points out that studies have not shown a decrease in the suicide risk of minors after the operations. On the contrary: the danger increases
New Hampshire is preparing to ban under-18s from undergoing sex-change operations. Last Thursday, the New Hampshire House of Representatives passed a bill to this effect, also with the help of some Democratic members. House Bill 619 prohibits doctors from performing 'any genital gender reassignment surgery', i.e. the removal of the uterus, ovaries and breasts in the case of women; testicles and penis for men, to anyone in the [...]
Read now
1 2 3 54