30 December 2020

The word 'woman' is already occupied

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

'Menstruating people': I am sure there is a term for these people. With these words JK Rowling entered the most fevered debate in contemporary society. Not even Covid-19 served to dampen the furore of the debate on transgender people. As two worldviews collided, some fundamental truths that generations before were considered unquestionable have been called into question.

What is it to be a woman? What is it to be a man? How can we differentiate between them? On the one hand there is the belief in gender identity, a feeling in our minds that drives nature and defines our true gender: we are the gender we think we are. But the creator of Harry Potter has expressed a contrary opinion. According to Rowling, she is a woman not because of a psychological issue but because of her biology, and she became very frustrated when her gender was relegated to 'menstruating person'. One hundred years after women gained the right to vote in many countries Rowling found herself involved in a campaign that the suffragettes could never have imagined: a battle to preserve her name as a 'woman'.

The response was predictable and brutal. As the actors who became famous through her books moved away from her, Rowling became the target of a campaign comparable to a modern-day witch-hunt. Women who have openly asserted that the word 'woman' belongs to them and them alone have faced noisy and sometimes violent opposition. To the vibrant protests against the Canadian feminist Meghan Murphy who gave a lecture at the Seattle Public Library in early February was followed by a meeting organised by the group Woman's Place UK in Brighton in the autumn. Women were attacked, others lost their jobs. The fury rages on because if women define themselves by their biology trans women feel excluded from womanhood. For trans women who desperately want to be seen as real women, this means existential rejection.

For me this is a personal matter. I am a trans woman therefore, it is my identity that is being rejected. But I am also a high school science teacher, and I know magic thinking when I see it. Trans women are men -certainly I am, as I am a father of three- while women are women. People-men are not people-women, therefore trans women are not women. Whatever emotions are stirring in this debate, JK Rowling is right. When I transitioned eight years ago Rowling's position would not have created any controversy. We transsexuals - that's what we were called before - changed our bodies to look like the opposite sex and to reintegrate into society as quietly as possible. Those of us in public office realised that this was not a decisive factor. Why should it be? We teachers, both men and women, do the same job and my transition did not interfere with Newton's laws of motion or any of the other issues I deal with as a teacher. But I rely on trusting relationships with people in my environment. Other men feel comfortable presenting themselves in women's clothing without changing their bodies. But no one ever thought that transvestites - that's how these untransformed men were considered - were women.

What has changed? How did these two groups - a small number of transsexuals and a larger number of transvestites - become a transgender movement able to question the use of biological sex to classify society? Between political leaders who wanted to show themselves to be progressive -or disinterested in the issue- and a population that knew nothing about it, new laws were made and policies were changed following the suggestions of transgender activists interested in these innovations. As gender and sex were merged, gender identity has silently replaced sex in policies and laws.. We were able to choose not only our gender but also our legal sex, with devastating consequences for women's rights. As Kiri Tunk, founder of the group Woman's Place UK said: "If you cannot define what a woman is, how can you defend women's rights?" (...)

Debbie Hayton, trans woman, UK high school teacher and columnist (translation by Eva Martínez Manzana). The original can be found at here.


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
You can send to: ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE BLU BRAMANTE
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
6 August 2022
California, transfusion of children
The American state proposes itself as a 'health' tourism destination for minors who are unable to access transition where they live. Exempting the parents and relieving the operators of any risk of litigation in the event of subsequent 'repentance'. Meanwhile in the UK, after the closure of the Tavistock, eyes are on a Scottish clinic where the experimental model (puberty blockers and surgery) continues to be applied
There is a real war going on in the United States over the ideology of gender identity and its promotion in schools. A 'culture war' pitting the elites, who fund and promote gender ideology, against the ordinary people who oppose it (see the Disney case here). While Biden from day one has made many legislative concessions to trans activism at the federal level, the Republicans have intercepted the discontent of the citizenry with various counter-legislation at the state level, such as [...]
Read now
29 July 2022
UK. Black week for the glittering trans-patriarchy: closed the Tavistock, gender clinic for children. And Allison Bailey wins in court: she was discriminated against for her gender critical views
The ideology of gender identity under attack in UK: NHS orders closure of paediatric transition clinic and points the way to psychological therapies. And Allison Bailey wins employment tribunal case backed by JK Rowling: employer ordered to compensate her for putting her 'under investigation' because of her gender critical views. At the suggestion of Stonewall, who comes out of it with her reputation in tatters
CLOSES TAVISTOCK, CHILDREN'S TRANSITION CLINIC: 'AFFIRMATIVE' APPROACH (DRUGS AND SURGERY) IS DANGEROUS FOR YOUNG PATIENTS The news is sensational: the British National Health Service (NHS) has ordered the closure of the Tavistock & Portman gender clinic for failing to ensure the safety of young patients, most of whom are girls (full article here). The clinic has been accused by several parties of hastily initiating many minors, most of them suffering from spectrum disorders [...].
Read now
28 July 2022
Argentina: stop neutral language in schools
E' was the first country to introduce gender self-identification. Ten years later it is among the first to ban neutral language in schools as it is 'not even that inclusive: it creates a barrier for children with learning difficulties'
In 2012, Argentina was the first country in the world to introduce self-id or gender self-identification into its legal system. Ten years later, it is one of the first countries to ban neutral language in schools. As taught by the mothers of radical feminism and difference thinking, the neutral is a red herring that actually brings the male point of view back to the centre. If the illusion of the neutral is less noticeable in the English language, it is immediately [...]
Read now
6 July 2022
Maya Forstater, fired for saying sex cannot be changed, wins in court: it was discrimination
Decisive for gender critical feminism around the world was the victory of Maya, a researcher who lost her job over a tweet in which she wrote that biological sex is immutable and that women have rights based on sex. Britain reaffirms the right to criticise gender identity: threats and accusations of transphobia are illegitimate. "A'further proof" says Forstater "that the wind is changing". The final ruling of the labour court also ordered the company that did not renew the contract of the researcher, co-founder of Sex Matters, to pay compensation. A triumph across the board
A year ago, June 2021, Feminist Post published an article on the case of Maya Forstater, the British researcher whose employment contract was not renewed by her employer for expressing critical views on the concept of gender identity and reaffirming the importance of women's gender-based rights. The article ended by reminding readers that Maya's case was not yet over and, although the appeal ruling of the [...]
Read now
5 July 2022
Women attacked from left and right: the ash on the head of the New York Times
As the organ of the liberals and woke culture, the great US newspaper has been undertaking a vigorous change of course for a few months now, admitting its own excesses and the misogyny of the new progressive course committed to wiping out women. While waiting for the self-critical wind to blow in Europe too
by Pamela Paul Perhaps it makes sense that women - complacent and pleasant-looking creatures, selfless and just as pretty - were the ones who finally brought our polarised country together. Because the far right and the far left have found the one thing they can agree on: women don't matter. The position of the right is best known, the movement has been aggressively dedicated for decades to depriving women of basic rights. Thanks also to two judges [...]
Read now
27 June 2022
New England Journal of Medicine: abortion ban is a health catastrophe
The prestigious magazine raises the alarm: it will be mainly poor and black women who will pay the price of the Supreme Court ruling, driven back into abortion with serious health risks. Even the morning-after pill and even the IUD could be banned and prosecuted as abortifacient means
The US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization represents an extraordinary reversal (...) Yet it was not unexpected. In the long and painful prelude to the decision, many states severely restricted access to reproductive health care. The fig leaf covering these restrictions was that induced abortion was a dangerous procedure that required stricter regulation to protect the health of women seeking such care. The facts belie this false rhetoric. The latest data available in the United States [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 26