31 March 2021

Australian government bans 'fluid' neo-language

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

"People who menstruate. I'm sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?". JK Rowling


The Australian Senate has passed a motion preventing the federal government from using 'gender-inclusive' language in any text. The senator from One Nation Malcolm Roberts made the motion in the Senate and the proposal passed 33 to 31.

"Our biology and our fundamental relationships are represented through the following definitions: mother, father, son, daughter, brother, sister, boy, girl, grandmother, grandfather, aunt, uncle, female, male, man, woman, lady, sir, daddy, mummy, husband, wife "reads the motion. "Genuine inclusion on a large scale cannot be achieved through distortions of biological and relational definitions"

The motion goes on to state that "the right of an individual to choose his or her own definitions and pronouns for personal use must not dehumanise the human species and undermine the gender".

The motion calls on the federal government to "Rejecting the use of distorted language such as gestational/non-gestational parent, menstruating, breastfeeding parent, birthing/non-birthing parent". It also states that any material produced, including legislation, websites and documentation as well as employee training must ignore these terms.

The motion passed the upper house with the support of the coalition senators. The Green Senator Janet Rice attempted to comment on the motion but was denied permission. She did not hold back later, posting the motion on Twitter.

"I expect this shit from One Nation." he said. "But the Morrison government has just voted in favour of the disgusting and bigoted Senate motion of One Nation that seeks to deny the identity of trans and non-binary people. So the motion passed. What happened to government for all Australians? Sacks of shit!".

The proposal comes in the wake of the suggestion by researchers at the Australian National University to drop terms such as 'mother', 'father' and 'breastfeeding' to be more inclusive. "Many students will identify as 'mothers' or 'fathers', but the use of these terms alone to describe parenting excludes those who do not identify with gender binarism."the research found.

(the original article here)

Most of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read about them elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding. If you think our work can be useful for your life, we would be grateful for even the smallest contribution.  

Please send to: BLU BRAMANTE CULTURAL ASSOCIATION

OBLIGATORY REASON: FEMINIST POST

IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
You can send to: ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE BLU BRAMANTE
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
27 June 2022
New England Journal of Medicine: abortion ban is a health catastrophe
The prestigious magazine raises the alarm: it will be mainly poor and black women who will pay the price of the Supreme Court ruling, driven back into abortion with serious health risks. Even the morning-after pill and even the IUD could be banned and prosecuted as abortifacient means
The US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization represents an extraordinary reversal (...) Yet it was not unexpected. In the long and painful prelude to the decision, many states severely restricted access to reproductive health care. The fig leaf covering these restrictions was that induced abortion was a dangerous procedure that required stricter regulation to protect the health of women seeking such care. The facts belie this false rhetoric. The latest data available in the United States [...]
Read now
27 June 2022
How they won the war against Roe
Failure to turn Roe v. Wade into law was the capital mistake of the American left, starting with Barack Obama. Abortion was an entirely secondary issue for trans-politics-absorbed liberals, who have spent years erasing the word 'woman' by renaming it as 'menstruator' and 'uterus carrier', rather than addressing women's rights
How did American pro-lifers win the war against Roe v. Wade? In the article of which we present you with extended excerpts, journalist Sarah Ditum explains how the Democrats' neglect and arrogance unwittingly helped set women's rights in America back 50 years. "When did it become certain that American women's right to abortion would be revoked? The Supreme Court's ruling that "Roe was terribly wrong from the start" leaked almost two months ago, [...]
Read now
25 June 2022
US midterm elections: will women be decisive after the abortion ruling?
What will American women do now? Will they win solidarity among themselves, as they have always won in Italy over abortion? Or will they settle into opposing sides in a quasi-civil war? The November vote will be the first test. Women could form the strong core of that moderate front that cannot find political expression in the US
What will American women do now? Will they win solidarity among themselves, as they have always won in Italy with regard to abortion, holding together Catholics and agnostics, left-wing and right-wing women in defence of law 194/78? Or will they settle into opposing camps, to put it mildly, the quasi-civil war underway in the United States? The midterm elections in November, with the Republicans as favourites, will be the first test: how many female voters, albeit [...].
Read now
20 June 2022
Bye bye 'Lia': world stop to trans swimmers in women's races
Despite the scandalous and opportunistic silence of the sports media, the World Swimming Federation closes to male bodies in women's competitions (something similar has also been decided for cycling). Soon, hopefully, all other categories will follow. The trophy-stealing 'Lia' Thomas cases will not happen again. Honour to the female athletes who fought against this colossal injustice. And to all of us who have resisted the misogynistic violence of gender ideology for years.
Fighting is needed: piece by piece the wall of trans-ideology is crumbling. And while the American Democrats - Hillary Clinton's word - are resoundingly distancing themselves from trans-activism because they realise that they are risking the presidency of the United States on these issues, the Fina (Fédération Internationale de Natation), the world governing body of swimming, has voted in favour of new rules according to which transgender athletes will not be allowed to compete in elite women's competitions if they have crossed any part of the [...]
Read now
19 June 2022
Hillary Clinton: if we keep talking about trans people we will lose the election
Interviewed by the Financial Times she admits that there are other priorities and that if they continue along this path the Democrats will lose the presidency, starting with the midterm in November. A resounding turnaround in the hope of salvaging what can be saved. Will the western democratic parties -starting with the PD- follow the gender critical change of course?
For the first time in years, American Democrats break the taboo: they do so with none other than the authoritative voice of former Secretary of State and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, according to whom continuing to talk about trans people will risk defeat for progressives. The interview is published in the Financial Times. Question Edward Luce: "The Democrats seem to be doing everything they can to lose the election by holding up activist causes-particularly the transgender debate-that are only relevant to a [...]
Read now
19 June 2022
Transition courses for middle schools in New Jersey
While major newspapers such as The New York Times and The Times publish increasingly concerned articles on the transition of minors -and in Italy deafening press silence- in schools in the US state, 'Ten Years of Testosterone' by Aydian Dowling, FtM influencer who propagandises the online sale of hormones, breast-crushing bands and rubber penises, is screened. Trans-spots explicitly take the place of'sex education
Almost at the same time as The New York Times, The Times also devotes two long articles to the child transition scandal (they could have woken up before thousands of little girls and boys were ruined with drugs and hormones, but instead they kept quiet until the very end). Headlines What went wrong at the Tavistock Clinic for trans teenagers? and My puberty was chemically delayed: I was their guinea pig. We are also waiting for the Italian media to wake up, from Corriere della Sera to La [...].
Read now
1 2 3 ... 19