US Congress promotes a Women's Bill of Rights inspired by feminist texts

To be able to call themselves women, not to be reduced to 'menstruators' or 'holes in the front', to have their own reserved spaces: the American Republicans take on the resistance of feminism against woke progressivism and propose a law of historic significance. Women's associations, from WoLF to WDI, approve. But dividing them remains the issue of abortion, with the Supreme Court ruling in the home stretch.
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

While ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), the largest American civil rights association, is conducting a campaign to argue that excluding male sex offenders from women's prisons is discriminatory and unconstitutionalon 19 May, a group of Republican representatives in the US Congress, Americans, first signatory Debbie Lesko, presented a resolution to introduce a Women's Bill of Rights, in order to legally define what a 'woman' isrecognise that women and girls deserve same-sex spaces and codify a standard of control so that the law can recognise sex when necessary.

The resolution was extended in cooperation with Independent Women's Voice (IWV), WoLF (Women Liberation Front) who had formulated their own Charter of Women's Rights on 31 March 2022.

WoLF welcomed the introduction of the Charter: "A historic resolution that will advance and protect women's rights in the United States. For too long, women have been told that there is no word to describe ourselves and our experiences. We have seen the definition of 'woman' distorted to promote offensive and harmful sexist stereotypes. This resolution is a clear signal that our voices can no longer be silenced in this way. WoLF proudly co-authored the model Women's Bill of Rights that inspired this resolution and we are grateful for the courageous leadership shown by Representative Lesko and Sen Hyde-Smith. The simple, common-sense provisions of this resolution will contribute to ensure that the government does not endorse the fiction of gender reassignment and that spaces and resources for women remain as such'.

Although there is nothing in the Women's Bill of Rights that a Democratic legislator on the side of women could find objectionable, the congressional resolution so far received only the support of the Republicans.

WoLF encourages going beyond rigid partisanship and believes that the Women's Bill of Rights is an excellent opportunity for both parties to come together to strengthen gender-based rights in US laws and policies. Indeed, the issue of abortion remains intact to divide feminism from conservatives: is expected any day now. US Supreme Court ruling which -according to the drafts circulated- would make termination of pregnancy illegal.

The resolution states:

considering that males and females possess biological differences unique and immutable that manifest themselves before birth and increase as they grow older and go through puberty;

Whereas biological differences between the sexes mean that only females can get pregnant, give birth and breastfeed children;

Whereas biological differences between the sexes mean that males are, on average, larger in sizeand possess greater body strength than females;

Whereas biological differences between the sexes may expose females to more harm than males due to specific forms of violence, including sexual assault;

considering that women have achieved significant and inspiring results in education, athletics and work;

considering that recent Erroneous court rulings on the definition of 'sex' have put the spaces and resources dedicated to women at risk, requiring clarification of certain terms:

The House of Representatives reaffirms that:

for the purposes of federal law, the 'sex' of a person means his or her biological sex (male or female) at birth;

for the purposes of the Federal Sex Act, the terms 'woman' and 'girl' refer to human females and the terms 'man' and 'boy' refer to human males;

for the purposes of federal law, the term 'mother' indicates a female parent and 'father' is defined as a male parent;

there are important reasons to distinguish between the sexes with regard to theathletics, prisons, domestic violence shelters, toilets and other areas, particularly where biology, security and privacy are involved.

(here the full text of the Resolution).

Introducing it at a press conference, first petitioner Debbie Lesko said: "I am proud to present the Women's Bill of Rights to affirm the importance of recognising women and their unique and distinctive characteristics and contributions to our nation. While the left continues to erase womenwe must fight for women and their place in our society. Whether it is keeping the word 'mother' in the law written or to ensure that domestic violence shelters for women should not accept biologic meni, we must defend women'.

Representative Jim Banks added: "The modern Democratic Party has put the left's woke agenda before women's rights. These days, the Democrats are refuse even to admit that women exist or recognise them as unique beings with unique abilities. While radical liberals stop progress and eliminate protections that generations of women have fought for, Republicans must fight back and recognise basic biological truths. As a father of three daughters, I am proud to co-chair this resolution reaffirming the legal protections afforded to them under federal law."

And again, Representative Mary Miller: "I will never be afraid to speak up for our daughters who need adults in leadership positions who are not afraid of being criticised by the radical left. The answer to the question 'what is a woman' has been clear throughout the history of our civilisation, and has not changed since Genesis. The radical left has launched an attack on biology because it wants to put itself above God and wants to brainwash our daughters with its wokeism. That is why today we are presenting the Women's Bill of Rights to legally define what it means to be a woman. I am doing this on behalf of my five daughters and all women. This common sense document will help codify our common understanding and what we all know about the words 'female', 'woman' and 'sex". I am proud to support him. 

And Representative Diana Harshbarger: "For me, being a woman means having the great honour of being a mother, grandmother, businesswoman and now a member of Congress. I am proud of this resolution on the Women's Bill of Rights because it sends a clear message that Congress must protect our future generations of women leaders from being deprived of measures to support their success, protect their security and secure the opportunities they have won'.

Finally, Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith stated: "The radical left demeans women's rights every time they ignore the biological differences between males and females. This resolution reaffirms these unique differences and seeks to protect women's rights, whether in athletics, prisons or battered women's shelters."

Il Congresso USA promuove una Carta dei Diritti delle Donne ispirata dai testi del femminismo

The Women's Bill of Rights is supported by many groups and associations, including: Independent Women's Voice, Independent Women's Law Center, Concerned Women for America LAC, Heritage Action for America, American Principles Project, Women's Liberation Front, Family Policy Alliance, Eagle Forum, Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) and Women's Declaration International USA (which Feminist Post refers to). Our text In Radice-For the inviolability of the female body, endorsed by WoLF among others, is perfectly in line with what is expressed in the resolution.

Here are their statements, after the WoLF one.

"Today, the interests of women and girls are being belittled by those who seek to eradicate sex-related sports, facilities and opportunities. I am grateful that Representatives Lesko, Banks, Harshbarger and Miller stand up for women and common sense".  Carrie Lukas, Independent Vice President of Women's Voice  

"We cannot fight gender discrimination if we do not agree on what it means to be a woman. And we cannot collect accurate data on women's public health, medicine, education, crime and economic status if we redefine sex to mean 'gender identity'. At the Independent Women's Law Centre, we know what a woman is. Fortunately, so do Representatives Lesko, Banks, Harshbarger and Miller.  Jennifer C. Braceras, Director of the Independent Women's Law Centre    

"It is shocking that women today are being told that our status is irrelevant and that being a woman has no relation to being a woman. Our protections are being destroyed by radical policies that confuse biological facts with gendered feelings and by activist judges who cannot define a Woman. Concerned Women for America LAC and Heritage Action for America applaud the resolution on the Women's Bill of Rights, which will recognise and protect the dignity of women and our unique status under the law'. Penny Young Nance, CEO and President of Concerned Women for America LAC

"The woke left has made it its mission to roll back decades of progress made in the name of women's rights. Their refusal to recognise the biological differences between men and women is unreasonable and in many cases dangerous. If left unchecked, the Left's assault on what it means to be a woman will continue to be a detriment to all biological women and will see opportunities and resources redirected to individuals who should never have received them. Fortunately, Congresswomen Lesko, Miller and Harsbarger, along with RSC President Jim Banks, are leading the effort to reaffirm what it means to be a woman and the dangers of the left's current trajectory". - Jessica Anderson, Executive Director of Heritage Action.  

"Americans will not remain silent against an ideology that erases women. To clear up any confusion over the definition of women, this bicameral effort simply reaffirms the truth: women are distinct from men and deserve equal protection under the law. We urge every member of Congress to protect women's civil rights and pass the Women's Bill of Rights resolution now.". - Autumn Leva, Senior Vice President of Family Policy Alliance. 

"The Left has revived efforts to erase women today with the indelible ink of the Women's Bill of Rights. When it comes to sex and gender, it is time to trust science. Women are women and men are men. We must recognise our physiological differences while celebrating our shared humanity. This resolution protects women in prisons and bathrooms, ensures that the spirit of Title IX is upheld in college sports, and restore common sense on how we refer to pregnant and breastfeeding women"Kris Ullman, President Eagle Forum.  

"Americans are currently facing an onslaught from the woke left to demean being a woman. Whether it is to attack women's sport, to reducing women to 'birthing persons', putting women at risk in prisons and toilets, or appointing a Supreme Court judge who cannot define what a woman is, conservatives must fight back. We at the Conservative Political Action Coalition (CPAC) would like to thank the Republican Study Committee, Representative Lesko and Senator Hyde-Smith for attempting to restore sanity by bringing forward the Women's Bill of Rights resolutionMatt Schlapp, President Conservative Political Action Coalition (CPAC).  

"Men and women are different. This is both a self-evident truth and a scientific fact recognised by the vast majority of Americans. However, for some here in Washington (mostly on the left), being male or female is just a label that can be changed at will. These radicals cannot define what a 'woman' is, even though they claim to defend women's rights. It would be comical, if the consequences were not so serious. In response to this dangerous ideology, it is imperative to legally clarify what should be obvious to any sane person: that 'man' and 'woman' are biologically based realities, not mere social constructs. Only by doing so will we ensure that everyone's rights are fully respected and upheld. APP is grateful to Rep. Lesko, Sen. Hyde-Smith and all the Republican members who support this resolution, and we urge the GOP to make this effort a priority, both now and, most importantly, should they regain a majority in Congress next year. Terry Schilling, President, American Principles Project.   

"The US delegation of Women's Declaration International (a non-partisan global organisation advocating for sex-based rights for women worldwide) is proud to support the Women's Bill of Rights, which will enshrine in law many of the principles outlined in the Global Declaration on Women Sex-based Rights, for which we are working to advance US law"Kara Dansky, President WDI USA. 

Marina Terragni


Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
You can send to: ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE BLU BRAMANTE
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
5 July 2022
Women attacked from left and right: the ash on the head of the New York Times
As the organ of the liberals and woke culture, the great US newspaper has been undertaking a vigorous change of course for a few months now, admitting its own excesses and the misogyny of the new progressive course committed to wiping out women. While waiting for the self-critical wind to blow in Europe too
by Pamela Paul Perhaps it makes sense that women - complacent and pleasant-looking creatures, selfless and just as pretty - were the ones who finally brought our polarised country together. Because the far right and the far left have found the one thing they can agree on: women don't matter. The position of the right is best known, the movement has been aggressively dedicated for decades to depriving women of basic rights. Thanks also to two judges [...]
Read now
27 June 2022
New England Journal of Medicine: abortion ban is a health catastrophe
The prestigious magazine raises the alarm: it will be mainly poor and black women who will pay the price of the Supreme Court ruling, driven back into abortion with serious health risks. Even the morning-after pill and even the IUD could be banned and prosecuted as abortifacient means
The US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization represents an extraordinary reversal (...) Yet it was not unexpected. In the long and painful prelude to the decision, many states severely restricted access to reproductive health care. The fig leaf covering these restrictions was that induced abortion was a dangerous procedure that required stricter regulation to protect the health of women seeking such care. The facts belie this false rhetoric. The latest data available in the United States [...]
Read now
27 June 2022
How they won the war against Roe
Failure to turn Roe v. Wade into law was the capital mistake of the American left, starting with Barack Obama. Abortion was an entirely secondary issue for trans-politics-absorbed liberals, who have spent years erasing the word 'woman' by renaming it as 'menstruator' and 'uterus carrier', rather than addressing women's rights
How did American pro-lifers win the war against Roe v. Wade? In the article of which we present you with extended excerpts, journalist Sarah Ditum explains how the Democrats' neglect and arrogance unwittingly helped set women's rights in America back 50 years. "When did it become certain that American women's right to abortion would be revoked? The Supreme Court's ruling that "Roe was terribly wrong from the start" leaked almost two months ago, [...]
Read now
25 June 2022
US midterm elections: will women be decisive after the abortion ruling?
What will American women do now? Will they win solidarity among themselves, as they have always won in Italy over abortion? Or will they settle into opposing sides in a quasi-civil war? The November vote will be the first test. Women could form the strong core of that moderate front that cannot find political expression in the US
What will American women do now? Will they win solidarity among themselves, as they have always won in Italy with regard to abortion, holding together Catholics and agnostics, left-wing and right-wing women in defence of law 194/78? Or will they settle into opposing camps, to put it mildly, the quasi-civil war underway in the United States? The midterm elections in November, with the Republicans as favourites, will be the first test: how many female voters, albeit [...].
Read now
23 June 2022
Trans issue: change of wind among progressives
The 'la' is given by the American Democrats, but also in the rest of the West the trans-filia of the progressives is beginning to show signs of breaking down. Electoral opportunism, sure. But the change must be registered. Keeping our eyes wide open
Michele Serra is a friend and I appreciate very much that he has taken it upon himself to break the silence from the left -finally- on the unbearable injustice of male bodies in women's sports (L'Amaca in La Repubblica yesterday, 22 June), an injustice against which we have been fighting for a long time (here you will find an infinity of texts on this subject). A note, if possible: I would have avoided using the woke cisgender definition, imposed by transactivism, and in which the vast majority of women in the world, athletes and non-athletes alike, [...].
Read now
20 June 2022
But women still exist
We don't like the title too much, especially that laconic 'again', but thanks to La Repubblica for hosting our intervention in the debate that started with Michela Marzano's text entitled 'Se non è il sesso a fare la donna'. We republish it here because you cannot find it on'online
Published in La Repubblica our text in the debate opened by Michela Marzano with her intervention on 'women with penises' and other wonders. We are keeping the original title that was given to our intervention so as not to cause confusion, even if we do not like it much. Here is the full text to follow. What is a woman? She is the one who brought us into the world, each and every one of us. Of this there can be no doubt. Which in no way means that [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 33