I was the fastest girl in Connecticut. Until I had to compete with men

An omertous silence covers the scandal of the invasion of women's sports by male 'ultra-bodies'. But at last some female athletes, destined for certain defeat, are starting to speak out.
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

Anna Vanbellinghen is a Belgian athlete -weightlifting- and At the next Olympics in Tokyo, she will also face New Zealand's Laurel Hubbard, the first trans Olympic athlete. Vanbellinghen says that having any chance with Hubbard is impossible, that this matter is "a bad joke" for the athletes. She is the first of the Olympians to break her silence, and so far the only one to do so.. Vanbellinghen understands that trans women athletes must be able to compete and hopes that a solution will be found, but it cannot be this one: "It's very unfair, for the sport and for the athletes".

Ero la ragazza più veloce del Connecticut. Finché non ho dovuto gareggiare con uomini

One of the very few to have protested against this blatant injustice is the American Chelsea Mitchell. Here is what she says.

February 2020. I'm squatting at the starting line of the high school indoor 55-meter run. This should be one of the best days of my life. I am running in the state championships and am ranked as the fastest female high school runner in the 55 metres. I should feel confident. I should know that I have a strong chance of winning.

Instead, I can only think as All my training, all I have done to maximise my performance may not be enough, simply because there is a runner on the line with a huge physical advantage: a male body.

I won that race, and I am grateful. But then, time after time, I lost.

I lost four girls' state championship titles, two all-New England awards and numerous other podium spots to male runners. I was bumped to third place in the 55-yard dash in 2019, behind two male runners. After each defeat, it becomes more and more difficult to try again.

It is adevastating experience. It tells me that I am not good enough; that my body is not good enough; and that it doesn't matter how hard I work, I am unlikely to succeed because I am a woman.

This experience is the reason why I and three of my female colleagues we filed a lawsuit last year with Alliance Defending Freedom against the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC)because girls and women must not be deprived of their right to fair competition.

The CIAC allows biological males to compete in women's sports. As a result, two males began running on the girls' track in 2017. In the 2017, 2018 and 2019 seasons alone, these males won 15 girls' track and field state championship titles (titles held in 2016 by nine different girls) and had more than 85 opportunities to participate in higher-level competition for female athletes.

This is because males have enormous physical advantages. Their bodies are simply and on average bigger and stronger than female bodies. For every single girl on the track this is a matter of course.

Ero la ragazza più veloce del Connecticut. Finché non ho dovuto gareggiare con uomini

But Connecticut officials are determined to ignore the obvious. And unfortunately, a federal district court has recently rejected our cause. This decision tells women and girls that their feelings and opportunities do not count, and that they cannot expect anyone to defend their dignity and rights.

This is wrong. E affects women's confidence in their own abilities.

It has happened to me over and over again. Every time I walk to the starting line, I try to tell myself that I can overcome obstacles - I can win, even if the odds are against me.

But in addition to psychological distress of experiencing unfair defeats over and over again, the CIAC policy causes tangible damage to women. It robs girls of the chance to run in front of college scouts who show up for elite competition, and to compete for scholarships and all the opportunities that come with college recruiting. I will never know if my college recruiting was affected by losing those four state championship titles to a male. When colleges looked at my record, they didn't see the fastest girl in Connecticut. They saw second or third place.

And it's not just happening to me. My friend and colleague Selina Soule was excluded from qualifying for the 55-meter state championship final and from the opportunity to qualify for the New England championship due to a male runner in 2019. Meanwhile, Alanna Smith, a very talented female athlete, was the runner-up in the 200 metres at the New England regional championships, but fell to third place defeated by a male competitor.

It is disheartening that the federal district court decided that these experiences - these missed opportunities - simply do not count.

But I am not yet defeated. And neither are my fellow athletes.

Through our Alliance Defending Freedom lawyers, my colleagues and I are appealing the federal district court's ruling. We are taking our case to the US Court of Appeals. for a second step, in which we will once again ask the court to recognise our right to fair competition - a right that we have no right to. Title IX (the amendment prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in state-supported education programmes) has been promising girls and women for 50 years. And we are fighting not only for ourselves, but for all female athletes. So, as we prepare for this new phase of the cause, I'm setting up in the starting blocks again, but for a different kind of race. And this time, I am confident that we can win..

Chelsea Mitchell, original article heretranslated by Maria Celeste.

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding. If you think our work can be useful for your life, we would be grateful for even the smallest contribution.  



IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
16 May 2024
UK: gender identity will no longer be discussed at school
A new crackdown by the Sunak government after the Cass report, which also warns of the risks of social transition of minors, the so-called 'alias identity' that has already been adopted by many Italian schools: in the classroom, it will no longer be taught that one can change sex and sex education will be calibrated according to age. And never without parental consent
After years and years of transactivists from associations such as Stonewall and Mermaids making the rounds with their sex education courses in English schools of all levels, Rishi Sunak's government announced today with Education Minister Gillian Keegan new mandatory guidelines for schoolchildren and students on these issues. Classrooms will no longer teach that you can change your gender identity, as has been the case until now [...]
Read now
22 April 2024
Letter to Rishi Sunak: we need a public enquiry into the influence of transgender ideology
One hundred and thirty British MPs, doctors, psychiatrists, academics and detransitioners - among them JK Rowling - have written a letter to the Prime Minister calling on him to examine the 'pervasive influence' of transgender ideology in schools and the National Health Service and to ascertain responsibility for the harm done to thousands of girls and boys
"Rishi, if you read this petition please do the right thing and urgently initiate a public enquiry. The welfare of our children depends on it." Writing this is psychotherapist James Esses, coordinator of the Biological Reality Statement and one of the signatories to an appeal to the British Prime Minister after the major scandal of the treatment of 'confused and vulnerable' children by medical professionals, made evident by Hilary Cass's report. Among the first signatories is JK [...]
Read now
21 April 2024
Gender is a battlefield
Joe Biden in the midst of campaigning replaces the word sex with gender identity. Germany and Sweden pass new trans laws allowing self-identification (self-id): German parents will be able to decide what sex their newborn child is regardless of whether it has a penis or a vagina. Meanwhile after England also Scotland bans puberty blockers for 'non-compliant' minors. And in Spain, one year after Ley Trans came into force, 'sex changes' have increased by 400 per cent. Even some 30 bearded soldiers have declared themselves women. The lobby pushes furiously and the chaos is unspeakable
While also in Scotland, after England, 'affirmative therapy' (puberty blockers followed by hormones and surgery) will no longer be prescribed to minors, a decision taken following the publication of the sensational Cass Review, in the United States President Biden - or rather, his firmly Obamian administration - in the midst of the presidential election campaign in November has effectively abolished Title IX of the Education Amendments in force since 1972. The amendment mandated that no one on the basis of sex could be excluded from [...]
Read now
14 April 2024
Hormone-addicted children: an in vivo trial. Who will pay for it?
Hilary Cass, the British paediatrician who produced a monumental report on 'affirmative therapy' for minors does not mince words: those children 'were used as footballs'. There has never been any evidence that puberty blockers work, that they reduce suicide risk, that they increase patients' well-being: far from it. Will those who, in the absence of scientific certainty, have inflicted these treatments, who have even persecuted so many people of goodwill determined to expose the scandal in the name of truth, go unpunished? Keira Bell, the best known detransitioner, hopes for criminal consequences
Englishwoman Keira Bell, a former patient of the Tavistock Clinic in London, is certainly the most famous of the de-transitioners. After the publication of the Cass Review she tells The Times that she would like to see criminal proceedings started so that the children treated by the clinic with puberty blockers and hormones can finally get justice. Keira is now 27, judges the treatment she was subjected to -blockers, hormones, removal of breasts- "experimental at best, destructive at worst" and believes the professionals have [...]
Read now
10 April 2024
UK. Cass report: no more affirmative therapy for children with gender-related problems
Pediatrician Hilary Cass' final report on child transitions comes out: offering affirmative therapy was a failure. There is no evidence on the effectiveness of puberty blockers, which should never be prescribed except in rare cases. Hormones of the opposite sex should not be given before the age of 18, and even between 18 and 25 caution should be exercised. A definitive watershed
The long-awaited final report of the Cass Review, an independent review chaired by paediatrician Hilary Cass on public health services for children and young people with 'gender dysphoria', came out this morning. Its final report and recommendations were presented to NHS England. Here are the highlights. The condemnation for affirmative therapy is final, and determined by the absolute lack of evidence that puberty blockers and opposite-sex hormones bring real benefits to children suffering from 'gender incongruence [...]
Read now
28 March 2024
Hormone therapies on children: doctors' insurances start to run away
The risk of million-dollar claims by minors undergoing irreversible treatment who regret the 'affirmative therapy' is too high: this is why some insurance companies no longer feel like covering 'gender medicine' under their policies
Those who resist the market for the transition of gender non-conforming girls and boys know very well that almost always the turning point - as was the case in the UK with Keira Bell and in the US with Chloe Cole - is the lawsuit brought by a former child-or treated-or with blockers and hormones against the doctors who administered the 'therapy': the detransitioners' side is decisive. Then the game becomes money versus money: the money collected by the gender clinics versus the money they end up [...].
Read now
1 2 3 37