California, transfusion of children

The American state proposes itself as a 'health' tourism destination for minors who are unable to access transition where they live. Exempting the parents and relieving the operators of any risk of litigation in the event of subsequent 'repentance'. Meanwhile in the UK, after the closure of the Tavistock, eyes are on a Scottish clinic where the experimental model (puberty blockers and surgery) continues to be applied
Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

There is a real war going on in the United States over the ideology of gender identity and its promotion in schools. A 'culture war' pitting the elites, who finance and promote gender ideology, and ordinary people who oppose it (see here the Disney case).

While Biden since first day has made many legislative concessions to trans activism at the federal level, Republicans have intercepted the discontent of the citizenry with several counter-legislations at the state level, such as those for "Saving women's sport" and those to protect children from medical transition, which often starts at school and without their parents' knowledge.

Today California, 'woke' state par excellence, try to counterattack using the same weapons: a lstate law that would circumvent laws protecting children from trans ideology in other states, creating a new form of health tourism for trans children. If the law is passed could be used when one of the parents opposes the transition medical treatment of the child, as in the case of the Canadian father imprisoned and fined for opposing his daughter's transition. Independent journalist Lisa Selin Davis explains:

"The Bill 107 [SB107], known simply as 'Gender Affirming Health Care', would allow children who are denied puberty blockers, hormones for the opposite sex, or gender-sensitive surgeries in one state to come to California to receive such surgeries, in defiance of parental or medical opposition, custody agreements or laws prohibiting their access in their home states.

The SB107 essentially transforms California into a 'sanctuary state' for children with trans identities, allowing them access to medical transition without a mental health evaluation or even a diagnosis of gender dysphoria. The law openly flouts several key provisions of the US Constitution; eliminates all controls for those seeking medical interventions for gender dysphoria or to affirm a trans identity; and nullifies the authority of any parent who objects. Written in response to laws in several conservative states banning what its supporters call 'gender affirming care', SB107 is a far-reaching law that will unleash a barrage of civil lawsuits and could pose a danger to young people seeking medical transition in environments lacking basic standards that guarantee access to such intensive interventions only to those who truly need them.

SB107 seems to have been written in response to laws in several conservative states prohibiting such medical interventions, such as Arkansas's HB1570, the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act. This law, which has been passed but is still being debated in the courts, delays any surgical or medical intervention for gender dysphoria until after the age of 18. And it seems at odds with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's recommendation that the medical gender transition of children be considered child abuse. [...]

The bill probably also responds to Idaho's H065, which criminalises the provision of gender-affirming treatment and adopts what critics have deemed an unusually draconian measure, making it a crime for anyone to travel out of state to obtain it. SB107 is a kind of pre-emptive strike against the Protecting Minors from Malpractice Act, a bill introduced in the US House and Senate that would extend to 30 years the period in which a former patient who regrets the transition can sue a doctor or gender clinic.

SB107, on the other hand, essentially absolves all care providers of any responsibility for the gender claim. The bill prohibits health workers, or anyone working for a health care plan, from releasing a child's medical records, even if they have been subpoenaed, to the home state. Medical records must also be kept from parents, which could create an insurmountable obstacle for the plaintiff for negligence to medical providers. Arrest warrants for parents who brought their children to California for treatment in violation of their home state's laws or custody agreements, and for the gender-based doctors who provided such treatment, would become unenforceable, with extradition prohibited

full article here (translation by Maria Celeste)

Meanwhile in the UK David Bell, the psychiatrist who first denounced the negligence of the Tavistock children's gender clinic, called for the immediate closure of the equivalent clinic in Scotland.

In an interview with The Times (full article here), David Bell stated that the services offered to minors who say they suffer from gender dysphoria of the Sandyford clinic in Glasgow is based on the so-called 'affirmative model'. -or immediate initiation of medical transition without a thorough psychological assessment- as well as the Tavistock being closed for security reasons following the evaluation of the commission headed by paediatrician Hillary Cass (see here e here).

Bell explained that children visited by gender clinics tend to have other problems, including autism, depression, dysfunctional families and a history of sexual abuseproblems that the 'affirmative model', heavily influenced by ideology, tends to ignore in order to push them hastily towards drugs and surgery causing irreversible damage to their bodies without resolving gender dysphoria (see the painful testimonies of the detransitioner).

"These children have been disadvantaged by being sent to a gender-only service," David Bell told The Times. "These children must be treated like all other children who have psychological problems.

"The other specific problem is the puberty-blocking drugs. In my opinion," Bell argues, "the blockage of a child's puberty should be an extremely rare occurrence. I still consider it an experimental treatment because the Gids (Gender Identity Development Service, Ed.) did not follow up these patients, and I expect the same in Scotland'.

In the wake of Dr Cass's recommendations, research was commissioned in England to follow up Gids patients and collect information on their long-term outcomes. Bell said this should also be done for former Sandyford patients, but added that "no child should have to go through that model'.

"There are many studies showing that if these children are helped in a different way, with expert attention and gender neutrality, abandon their desire [to make the transition],' he added. "Growing up, many of them do coming out as young gays and lesbians...".

Finally, Bell sounded the alarm on the ideological position of the current Scottish government, led by the SNP (Scottish National Party), which 'is likely to make it more difficult to see the harm being done to children by inappropriate and experimental treatment'. In fact, the SNP intends to amend the law to make it even easier to change the sex on documents, effectively introducing a 'super Self-ID', as we told you here.

Maria Celeste

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
30 November 2023
Born of a surrogate mother
Olivia Maurel, 32, was born to a surrogate mother and today she is fighting on the front line against the practice, which she describes as 'atrocious' and 'monstrous'. She always knew something was wrong with her family. She suffers from depression, has had problems with alcoholism and has attempted suicide several times. Only recently has she discovered the truth about her origins and that she suffered the trauma of abandonment. "To no child," she says, "should what happened to me ever happen again."
Commercial or 'altruistic' surrogacy must be abolished. These are the words of Olivia Maurel, born in December 1991 in Kentucky by traditional surrogacy (i.e. in which the oocyte also belongs to the 'surrogate mother', ed.), who recounted her experience in a conference at the parliament of the Czech Republic. Today, married with two children in Cannes, 'proud to be a feminist' as we read on her X page, she fights against surrogacy. Her testimony, very valuable as there are still very few [...]
Read now
12 November 2023
Israel 7 October: Appeal for recognition as mass feminicide
The women victims of the Hamas attack were not killed like all other civilians: they were exposed naked, raped, brutalised, humiliated, decapitated, their bodies burnt and torn to pieces. "We wanted to dirty them," say the terrorists. The violence against these women meets the definition of mass feminicide: from France a petition to international NGOs
The women victims of the Hamas attack were not killed like all other civilians: they were exposed naked, raped, brutalised, humiliated, decapitated, their bodies burnt and torn to pieces. "We wanted to dirty them," say the terrorists. The violence against these women meets the definition of mass feminicide: from France a petition to international NGOs
Read now
10 November 2023
British academics against cancel culture
On 20 November, the London Universities Council for Academic Freedom will be unveiled, a body that brings together a hundred or so professors from the major British universities with the intention of fighting against the censorship and single-mindedness that in recent years have impeded academic debate and freedom, compromising the education of thousands of students. In the crosshairs especially Lgbtq+ realities such as Stonewall that have heavily influenced university and higher education. About time, and go on!
As reported by The Telegraph, more than a hundred academics from the UK's top universities have joined forces to tackle the growing threat of cancel culture through the creation of a new body dedicated to academic freedom. In a pioneering initiative, the scholars have formed the 'London Universities Council for Academic Freedom', involving all academic institutions in the capital including University College London (UCL), King's College London, [...]
Read now
9 November 2023
13 November in The Hague against surrogacy
The Private International Law Conference is pushing for transnational recognition of gestation per se contracts with the intention of forcing national legislation to benefit biomarket profits. The Icams coalition against GPA organised a demonstration in defence of women's dignity and against the market in girls and children
The International Coalition to Abolish Surrogacy (ICASM) organised an international demonstration in front of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) on 13 November to oppose the regulation of cross-border 'surrogacy'. Indeed, attempts are being made to impose international regulation of so-called 'surrogacy': as of 13 November, the HCCH will set up a working group with the task of drafting a convention to allow cross-border recognition of contracts. This is to meet the growing demand in the biomarket [...]
Read now
8 November 2023
Canada: gender critical nurse risks her job
Amy Hamm works in a psychiatric ward and is under investigation for promoting women's rights based on sex and child protection online. The BCCNM, the body that regulates the nursing profession, intends to suspend her unless she participates in a re-education programme but Amy opposes this: the hearing is underway. US journalist Megyn Kelly interviewed her
Canadian nurse Amy Hamm - one of the founders of the non-profit coalition Canadian Women Sex Based Rights (caWsbar) - works in an acute psychiatric ward specialising in mental health and substance use. Amy risks losing her nursing licence and her job because she allegedly promoted women's sex-based rights and child protection online. In recent years, Amy has been the subject of an investigation by the British Columbia College of Nurses & Midwives [...]
Read now
6 November 2023
No more drugs for children with gender dysphoria!
For many years a pioneer of puberty blocker and hormone-based treatments for 'gender non-conforming' minors, Finnish psychiatrist Riittakerttu Kaltiala now denounces these 'therapies' as dangerous, useless and lacking in scientific evidence. And she calls on doctors around the world to find the courage to break the silence imposed by activist censorship and the media's rubber wall
In Italy there persists an obstinate silence on pharmacological treatments for minors with gender dysphoria (puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, 'gender reassignment' surgery) according to the protocol of so-called gender affirmative therapy. It is not possible to know how many minors have been treated or are undergoing treatment, in how many and which centres they are treated and with what 'success' (or failure) rates. While throughout the Western world the debate has been open for some time and in some countries [...]
Read now
1 2 3 53