13 March 2021

The left, the right, the veil

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

The President of the Senate Maria Elena Alberti Casellati is a distinguished lady with a polite smile and a bombastic name. Politically, she is on the right. In other times we would have called her a conservative Christian Democrat. Feminism is also alien to it, This did not prevent her, in her inaugural speech, from speaking firmly and non-rhetorically about the phenomenon of misogynistic violence.

I happened to think of the lady again after the webinar on Veil and freedom with Marina Terragni, Sara Punzo and Maryan Ismail. Exactly two years ago, an infinite amount of time for the dilated rhythms of the Covid era, Casellati met in Doha with Prime Minister Abdullah bin Nasser bin Khalifa al-Thani, another man who is no slouch when it comes to names and patronymics. At the same time she was received by Pope Francis. On both occasions, her dress was composed and formal, yet casual and in a certain sense strong-willed. Next to the Qatari minister she appeared petite, delicate but radiant, and quite direct. When she posed with the Pope she looked like an ancient princess or a pious noblewoman. But not submissive or annulled either, despite the conspicuous black veil.

We specify: she wore her veil in front of the Pontiff. In Qatar, she had presented herself bareheaded.

Out of disrespect for Islamic customs? We would not say so. Rather for that need, probably spontaneous, to define oneself and value differences. The conservative Casellati seemed to have understood that genuine dialogue did not entail the cancellation of the culture of belonging, but required a confrontation on the same level of dignity. The Madame of Palazzo Madama presented herself as an Italian politician, of Catholic tradition - i.e. universal - who carried out her role in full autonomy.

If we look at the photographs of left-wing, secular and openly feminist ministers and ex-ministers, the scenario is quite different. Laura Boldrini with an overly conspicuous veil in the Rome mosque (but without a headdress and in lacquered sandals in the presence of the Pope); Federica Mogherini at the Iranian Parliament, also wearing a veil - mimicked by Emma Bonino and Debora Serracchiani - arousing the indignation of the feminists of that country who fight at the risk of their lives for the freedom to dress as they like.

If you were ignorant of the political history of these women, to whom would you attribute the epithet 'progressive'? The former or the latter?

Not to rub it in. Perhaps it really was a matter of good faith, as well as obligation. We are well aware that Vatican protocol has not provided for a compulsory veil for women since the 1980s. In some countries, and Qatar is no exception, female modesty is more than simply recommended. But gestures go beyond the prescriptions; and, at times, one gets the impression that the pillory is being sought. The irritation towards certain progressive policies cannot (always) be ascribed to sexism, indifference or - we had to read this too - Islamophobia. It is about culture. And tradition. Which is not traditionalism but transmission. Even if critics sometimes unconsciously motivated of the above policies blamed them for exactly this: lack of culture.

Women with university degrees, cosmopolitans, supporters of a marked migrantism: and yet ignorant, because they do not escape from a mannered exoticism, pervaded, moreover, by a poorly concealed sense of superiority.

The portrait with the Pope fully demonstrates this. The perceived message, perhaps beyond intentions, is: 'Here I can afford to wear my hair down and my slippers, I don't believe it, I am modern. Elsewhere you have to show devotion, the good savages must be indulged. And then, 'it's left-wing'....

A left wing that has so far shown itself to be deaf to the persecution of Christians (and especially Christian women: deserves eternal shame the silence of Western activists on Huma Younus and Leah Sharibu) of Africa and Asia, because they are non-European "competitors"; because Christian culture, especially Catholic, must necessarily be considered a by-product of dark ages, from which a feminist doc, open and libertarian, must take decisive distance. Add to this the identification of Catholicism with the West - the same equation as that of the jihadists - which the very liberal westerners see as smoke in the eyes; while a "glamorous" queen like Rania of Jordan does not hesitate to show herself to Bergoglio in a white stole, with a naturalness that shows anything but submission and pandering.

The reaction to the current Left's snootiness is disaffection and tedium, even among long-time militants.

It is not surprising that at this moment in history the most reforming positions come from notoriously 'moderate' sectors. It is also obvious, however. If the error consists in ignorance - and loss of memory - the result is confusion, the overlapping of development and progress, the unhinging of perspectives. "Only Marxists love the past," wrote Pasolini - the bourgeois love nothing, their rhetorical affirmations of love for the past are simply cynical and sacrilegious: however, at best, such love is decorative, or 'monumental' [...], certainly not historicist, that is, real and capable of new history'.

But it is precisely a sense of history, of a history that is advancing and changing, that is lacking in today's left no longer Marxist, but liberal-capitalist, 'bourgeois'. Exactly, modernist and not modern. The right lives off this spoliation, rather than its own values.But the process has only just begun, and no one seems to realise this.

Daniela Tuscano

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
You might also be interested in
27 March 2023
Is violence structural to transfeminism?
Paola Pieri, from the group MaternaMente, recounts the violence she suffered in Florence from trans activists
Text by Paola Pieri, of the group MaternaMente. Last Thursday, 23 March, I went in front of the Careggi hospital, here in Florence, where a small garrison called by 'Resistance to the nanoworld' was being held, attended by Silvia Guerini, author of the book 'From the neutral body to the post-human cyborg, critical reflections on gender ideology'. Presidium called in such a place because it is where dozens of minors and others with 'gender dysphoria', treated with puberty blockers, hormones and other planned [...].
Read now
3 March 2023
Women and the left: a toxic love
Betrayed, abused, humiliated. And finally supplanted by self-identified neo-women who are far more attractive and functional than the 'old' women by birth. Yet many among us cannot break away from the progressives who show in every way that they do not consider them. The same dynamics of a sick relationship
All loves are born and die, and when they end there is always the one who suffers the most, sometimes only one party, the one who loved sincerely, the other perhaps not, perhaps he was lying. And we women believed in love with the left side seriously, with all our hearts: naively we thought we were the favourites, we believed in promises, even those that clearly appeared false. Carla Lonzi already reminded us half a century ago that the left had sold us 'to the hypothetical Revolution', and even overseas the [...]
Read now
3 March 2023
Femicide and Feminicide
According to a narrow interpretation, the number of these crimes would be decreasing because not all murders of women would fall under this heading. A false and dangerous reading of the data that deserves careful vigilance
The term femicide was first introduced by criminologist Diana H. Russel to define those situations in which a woman's death is the outcome/consequence of misogynistic attitudes or practices. Mexican anthropologist and politician Marcela Lagarde, conversely, introduces the term femicide to describe 'the extreme form of gender-based violence against women, produced by the violation of their human rights in public and private spheres through various misogynistic conducts such as mistreatment, physical, psychological, sexual, educational, [...]
Read now
7 November 2022
Belgium, new feminicide law. To be studied
In Europe, male violence is the leading cause of death for women between the ages of 16 and 44. Belgium equips itself with a new law that for the first time legally defines feminicides in order to develop policies based on official statistics. Keeping in mind that violence is a device of male domination
Stop the slaughter of women. This is the meaning of the new 'law on the prevention of and fight against feminicides, gender-based crimes and the violence that precedes them' adopted at first reading in the Council of Ministers on 25 October in Belgium. Deposed by the Secretary of State for Gender Equality, Sarah Schlitz (Ecolo/Verdi), the framework law for the first time legally defines feminicides in order to develop combat policies based on official statistics. And in [...]
Read now
13 October 2022
Boldrini is wrong
In the name of bigenitoriality and ideological paritarianism, the PD parliamentarian proposes an amendment to Article 37 of the Constitution, which speaks of the relationship between mother and child as deserving 'special protection'. It would be a great 'constitutional' gift to the lobby of separated fathers supported in particular by the League. And it would increase the risks for mothers and children
Laura Boldrini announces her intention to immediately deposit in Parliament a series of proposals that she calls a 'rights package'. These include the idea of an amendment to Article 37 of the Constitution which states that 'A working woman has the same rights and, for equal work, the same pay as a worker. Working conditions must allow the fulfilment of her essential family function and ensure special adequate protection for the mother and child'. Boldrini's intent is [...]
Read now
5 October 2022
The Iranians are fighting for us too
Women in Iran are oppressed, violated and killed precisely because of their bodies as women. And their revolt could free everyone and everyone. Is'the woke West of'gender identity and 'freedom of the veil' ready to understand and support this revolution that blows for us too? Woman, life, freedom
In the uncertain and ever-changing geopolitical order of our time, in the midst of a global political agenda that from right to left forgets women, betraying, albeit in different ways, female exclusivity and the richness of sexual difference, the struggle of Iranian women has something epic, something moving. The killing of Mahsa Amini shows how the issue of the 'veil as freedom' is the quintessence of intellectual dishonesty, of logical fallacy, of an age-old lie. To 22-year-old Mahsa, the desire to 'feel the [...]
Read now
1 2 3 ... 8