13 March 2021

The left, the right, the veil

Please be aware that the translation of contents, although automatic, has a cost to Feminist Post but is provided to you without any charge. Please consider making a contribution via the "Support us" page if you intend to use our translation service intensively.
The contents of this site are translated using automatic translation systems without the intervention of professional translators.
Translations are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading by international visitors.
Share this article

The President of the Senate Maria Elena Alberti Casellati is a distinguished lady with a polite smile and a bombastic name. Politically, she is on the right. In other times we would have called her a conservative Christian Democrat. Feminism is also alien to it, This did not prevent her, in her inaugural speech, from speaking firmly and non-rhetorically about the phenomenon of misogynistic violence.

I happened to think of the lady again after the webinar on Veil and freedom with Marina Terragni, Sara Punzo and Maryan Ismail. Exactly two years ago, an infinite amount of time for the dilated rhythms of the Covid era, Casellati met in Doha with Prime Minister Abdullah bin Nasser bin Khalifa al-Thani, another man who is no slouch when it comes to names and patronymics. At the same time she was received by Pope Francis. On both occasions, her dress was composed and formal, yet casual and in a certain sense strong-willed. Next to the Qatari minister she appeared petite, delicate but radiant, and quite direct. When she posed with the Pope she looked like an ancient princess or a pious noblewoman. But not submissive or annulled either, despite the conspicuous black veil.

We specify: she wore her veil in front of the Pontiff. In Qatar, she had presented herself bareheaded.

Out of disrespect for Islamic customs? We would not say so. Rather for that need, probably spontaneous, to define oneself and value differences. The conservative Casellati seemed to have understood that genuine dialogue did not entail the cancellation of the culture of belonging, but required a confrontation on the same level of dignity. The Madame of Palazzo Madama presented herself as an Italian politician, of Catholic tradition - i.e. universal - who carried out her role in full autonomy.

If we look at the photographs of left-wing, secular and openly feminist ministers and ex-ministers, the scenario is quite different. Laura Boldrini with an overly conspicuous veil in the Rome mosque (but without a headdress and in lacquered sandals in the presence of the Pope); Federica Mogherini at the Iranian Parliament, also wearing a veil - mimicked by Emma Bonino and Debora Serracchiani - arousing the indignation of the feminists of that country who fight at the risk of their lives for the freedom to dress as they like.

If you were ignorant of the political history of these women, to whom would you attribute the epithet 'progressive'? The former or the latter?

Not to rub it in. Perhaps it really was a matter of good faith, as well as obligation. We are well aware that Vatican protocol has not provided for a compulsory veil for women since the 1980s. In some countries, and Qatar is no exception, female modesty is more than simply recommended. But gestures go beyond the prescriptions; and, at times, one gets the impression that the pillory is being sought. The irritation towards certain progressive policies cannot (always) be ascribed to sexism, indifference or - we had to read this too - Islamophobia. It is about culture. And tradition. Which is not traditionalism but transmission. Even if critics sometimes unconsciously motivated of the above policies blamed them for exactly this: lack of culture.

Women with university degrees, cosmopolitans, supporters of a marked migrantism: and yet ignorant, because they do not escape from a mannered exoticism, pervaded, moreover, by a poorly concealed sense of superiority.

The portrait with the Pope fully demonstrates this. The perceived message, perhaps beyond intentions, is: 'Here I can afford to wear my hair down and my slippers, I don't believe it, I am modern. Elsewhere you have to show devotion, the good savages must be indulged. And then, 'it's left-wing'....

A left wing that has so far shown itself to be deaf to the persecution of Christians (and especially Christian women: deserves eternal shame the silence of Western activists on Huma Younus and Leah Sharibu) of Africa and Asia, because they are non-European "competitors"; because Christian culture, especially Catholic, must necessarily be considered a by-product of dark ages, from which a feminist doc, open and libertarian, must take decisive distance. Add to this the identification of Catholicism with the West - the same equation as that of the jihadists - which the very liberal westerners see as smoke in the eyes; while a "glamorous" queen like Rania of Jordan does not hesitate to show herself to Bergoglio in a white stole, with a naturalness that shows anything but submission and pandering.

The reaction to the current Left's snootiness is disaffection and tedium, even among long-time militants.

It is not surprising that at this moment in history the most reforming positions come from notoriously 'moderate' sectors. It is also obvious, however. If the error consists in ignorance - and loss of memory - the result is confusion, the overlapping of development and progress, the unhinging of perspectives. "Only Marxists love the past," wrote Pasolini - the bourgeois love nothing, their rhetorical affirmations of love for the past are simply cynical and sacrilegious: however, at best, such love is decorative, or 'monumental' [...], certainly not historicist, that is, real and capable of new history'.

But it is precisely a sense of history, of a history that is advancing and changing, that is lacking in today's left no longer Marxist, but liberal-capitalist, 'bourgeois'. Exactly, modernist and not modern. The right lives off this spoliation, rather than its own values.But the process has only just begun, and no one seems to realise this.

Daniela Tuscano

Much of the news published by Feminist Post you will not read elsewhere. That is why it is important to support us, even with a small contribution: Feminist Post is produced solely by the voluntary work of many people and has no funding.
If you think our work can be useful for your life, we will be grateful for even the smallest contribution.

You can give us your contribution by clicking here: Patreon - Feminist Post
   - or -
Obligatory reason: FEMINIST POST
IBAN: IT80C0200812914000104838541
You might also be interested in
25 July 2022
Open field, closed lists
The tiger's eye does not want to see that you can reassemble and recombine the line-up all you want, but if the faces and names remain the same you have very little credibility. And if the only goal recognisable to most of the electorate is to bar the way for your political opponent - for once a woman, which makes it all the more surreal - your chances of success are not very good.
Work is in progress on the construction of the large rassemblement or open camp (the wide one has been discontinued). The discussion is only between men (with the partial exception of Emma Bonino) and the cement that holds the coalition project together is 'stopping Meloni': there is little discussion of political programmes, and what Calenda, Fratoianni and Di Maio may have in common is all to be understood. Observers and sociologists of politics scoff to point out that building a project 'against' [...].
Read now
5 July 2022
Women attacked from left and right: the ash on the head of the New York Times
As the organ of the liberals and woke culture, the great US newspaper has been undertaking a vigorous change of course for a few months now, admitting its own excesses and the misogyny of the new progressive course committed to wiping out women. While waiting for the self-critical wind to blow in Europe too
by Pamela Paul Perhaps it makes sense that women - complacent and pleasant-looking creatures, selfless and just as pretty - were the ones who finally brought our polarised country together. Because the far right and the far left have found the one thing they can agree on: women don't matter. The position of the right is best known, the movement has been aggressively dedicated for decades to depriving women of basic rights. Thanks also to two judges [...]
Read now
23 June 2022
Trans issue: change of wind among progressives
The 'la' is given by the American Democrats, but also in the rest of the West the trans-filia of the progressives is beginning to show signs of breaking down. Electoral opportunism, sure. But the change must be registered. Keeping our eyes wide open
Michele Serra is a friend and I appreciate very much that he has taken it upon himself to break the silence from the left -finally- on the unbearable injustice of male bodies in women's sports (L'Amaca in La Repubblica yesterday, 22 June), an injustice against which we have been fighting for a long time (here you will find an infinity of texts on this subject). A note, if possible: I would have avoided using the woke cisgender definition, imposed by transactivism, and in which the vast majority of women in the world, athletes and non-athletes alike, [...].
Read now
10 June 2022
Madonna mistress sadomasochism
A bare-breasted Madonna dressed as an S&M mistress paraded on the shoulders of a group of protesters during the Pride in Cremona. These are the reflections of Daniela Tuscano
Maria vulva sacra, Our Lady of Milk, is one of the oldest and most venerated icons, especially in the Middle East and Ethiopia, where Christianity took root from the first century. Even today, the Grotto of Milk in Jerusalem is the destination of incessant pilgrimages of women expecting or wishing to become mothers. Every 29 April, the Orthodox Church celebrates with a splendid hymn the breasts of Mary, the 'life-giving Spring' that lifts the sick from their beds, frees the afflicted, strengthens the frail, [...]
Read now
24 May 2022
US Congress promotes a Women's Bill of Rights inspired by feminist texts
To be able to call themselves women, not to be reduced to 'menstruators' or 'holes in the front', to have their own reserved spaces: the American Republicans take on the resistance of feminism against woke progressivism and propose a law of historic significance. Women's associations, from WoLF to WDI, approve. But dividing them remains the issue of abortion, with the Supreme Court ruling in the home stretch.
While the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), America's largest civil rights association, is campaigning to argue that barring male sex offenders from women's prisons is discriminatory and unconstitutional, on 19 May, a group of Republican representatives in the US Congress, first signatory Debbie Lesko, introduced a resolution to introduce a Women's Bill of Rights, in order to legally define what a 'woman' is, recognise that women and [...]
Read now
13 May 2022
Right, left, human, transhuman
The issue of 'rights' -from gender identity to the uterus for rent- is not complementary or on the sidelines, but outlines the horizon towards which we move. But the post-human perspective pursued by progressives is not unique and inescapable. The alternative exists: a female-rooted civilisation
By re-submitting the Zan bill in the Senate with very little chance of it passing -when instead other solutions, such as the Scalfarotto bill, would have ensured a law against homobitransfobia- PD secretary Letta has repeatedly stressed that the issue of rights is decisive for his party. The theme of rights, however, is always placed as complementary, on the sidelines of issues considered far more relevant: the war, certainly, economic issues, but also simply the electoral law. In truth, most of the game [...].
Read now
1 2 3 ... 7