Near
Choose Category
Search by Hashtag

Non-Mother's Day
Natural motherhood is on the right, biotech motherhood is on the left because it is thought of as a right and not suffered as destiny: the diatribe on this topic between radical feminism and transfeminism could be summarized in this way. E' anything but new but it has become radicalized. Also because the context has changed a lot: the baby boom is one thing, births at an all-time low are another

Non-Mother's Day
Natural motherhood is on the right, biotech motherhood is on the left because it is thought of as a right and not suffered as destiny: the diatribe on this topic between radical feminism and transfeminism could be summarized in this way. E' anything but new but it has become radicalized. Also because the context has changed a lot: the baby boom is one thing, births at an all-time low are another

Open letter to Schillaci, Minister of Health: medically assisted procreation does not increase the birth rate. Indeed, it is among the causes of the demographic winter
Free homologous fertilization and 1500 euro ticket for the heterologist: the minister announces new measures that would help stem the birth crisis. But it is the exact opposite: the more the illusion of being able to postpone the birth of a child ad libitum is fueled - the results of MAP are poor: in more than 8 out of 10 cases it fails - the fewer children will be born. There is only one path: the prevention of infertility. Starting with correct information against the propaganda of the reproductive biomarket

Female uteruses in male bodies
The envious dream of all time - being able to have children without women, eliminating mothers, in short the Grail - is ever closer to coming true: within 5-10 years even MtF trans people, biologically men, will be able to receive a uterus transplant and conduct a gestation. “Inclusive” desire-right that would improve the quality of their life and alleviate the symptoms of dysphoria. While the life and health of girls and boys born from these practices do not worry bioethicists

Making babies in vitro: special from The Economist
The weekly magazine recognizes the high percentage of failures of assisted reproduction and illustrates the new techniques - from gametogenesis to mitochondrial replacement - hoping for rapid progress. But it is silent on the health risks for children. And he doesn't talk about preventing infertility: a commitment that would damage the enormous business

On the risks of the ROPA method
The technique used by a growing number of lesbian couples consists in using the oocyte of one to create an embryo which will then be inserted into the womb of the other which will lead to the pregnancy. A dangerous practice physically and psychologically both for the two women and for the child who will be born. Here because

For the true good of children
Demand the complete transcription of birth certificates for those born from rented wombs and other assisted fertilization practices, rejecting the path of adoption by "intentional" parent (stepchild) indicated by the Court of Cassation and validated in these hours by the European Court of Human Rights, harms minors in the first instance. And it deprives them of those rights that they claim to want to defend: our statement

Matic Report: Europe pushes on gender identity
Bypassing the sovereignty of member countries, the European Parliament produces indications on sexual and reproductive health: self-id, male maternity, rented uterus, assisted fertilization for all, hormones for children, rented uterus. The hand of Big Tech on our lives, for an anthropological mutation of the human

Constitutional Court: we need a law for rainbow children. But renting a womb remains a serious crime

Scroll to Top